Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for $QBiT Miner 🛡️

Channel

$QBiT Miner 🛡️

@QBitMiner

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,841subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001510033841
TypeChannel
Username@QBitMiner
DescriptionMiner @QBiTminer_bot X https://x.com/qbitminer Web: https://qbitminer.network
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/QBitMiner

Growth

7,8397,8727,855.57 August 2026 — 7,866 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,866 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,872 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,854 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,839 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,841 subscribers7,8417 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,834–7,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 16:077,841+2
14 Aug 2026, 13:377,839-15
11 Aug 2026, 00:577,854-18
8 Aug 2026, 11:017,872+6
7 Aug 2026, 19:317,866no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:237,866first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.1%
avg views ÷ 7,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,810
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held31 (12 July 202616 August 2026)
Views total39,817
Reactions total816
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
111
Links
42

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,107 reactions across 30 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥43239.0%
38835.0%
👍22220.1%
🐳655.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 30 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @QBitMiner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC400 views27 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

👉 https://x.com/qbitminer/status/2089068206132797759

🔥1710

16 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC470 views20 reactionsread 18 August 2026

All active miners granted 💎⭐️👑 badges Always be active 👀

🔥14👍6

16 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC510 views26 reactionsread 18 August 2026

📣 If you don’t have 💎⭐️👑 badges ⏰Activate your miners in 2 hours

🔥1210👍4

15 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC629 views35 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

👉Limited Trident 🔱 supply available for claim 👉Once all distributed, miners will need to buy from secondary market (P2P)

👍1511🔥9

15 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC692 views24 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

📣 Announcement 👉 Trident 🔱 Badge claim is open again ⏰Ends in 6 hours

🔥24

14 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC917 views32 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026
Photo

👉Community voted and team delivers 👉Claim Trident 🔱 Badge before it’s gone ⏰Ends in 6 hours 👉 https://x.com/qbitminer/status/2088073199934214289

19🔥13

13 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC949 views24 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026

👉Community decided 🔱 Trident badge 🔔Be ready whenever the claim is live

🔥177

13 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTC≈1,090 views42 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

Which badge do you need to claim?

  1. 👑 OG33%
  2. ⭐️ Ambassador24%
  3. 💎 Loyal26%
  4. 🔱 Trident46%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20🔥15🐳4👍3

11 Aug 2026, 01:50 UTC≈1,420 views48 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

✅Correct Answer: 6 ✅All correct entries granted “Loyal 💎 Badge 👀 Stay Active

33🔥15

8 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,850 views65 reactions11 Starsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📣Submit your answer and earn Loyal 💎 badge ⏰Ends in 24 hours

👍30🔥1714🐳4

5 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈2,290 views79 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎯 DAILY TASKS ARE LIVE! 👉Complete simple tasks daily → claim your streak boost. 👉Up to 10× boost 👉Miss a day = streak resets. 👉Keep it alive

40🔥39

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @QBitMiner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 01:33 UTCFinal Results125 voters

Which badge do you need to claim?

  1. 👑 OG33%
  2. ⭐️ Ambassador24%
  3. 💎 Loyal26%
  4. 🔱 Trident46%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jul 2026, 01:51 UTCAnonymous Poll308 voters

Do you want free badges?

  1. Yes91%
  2. No11%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 688,856 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“$QBiT Miner 🛡️” (@QBitMiner), 7,841 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/QBitMiner.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.