Seems this is the 1st 420 coin to pump today. Name is "This will go high" hahaha 😂 Waiting for Dope to follow HqqPyJcVMT2zC7Y7rRmhz74scD5qWgrgvXPNWcRtpump

Channel
Pythagoras Calls
@PythagorasDev
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,208subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001692756070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PythagorasDev |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PythagorasDev |
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 4,208 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 4,216 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 4,217 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 4,217 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Checking DOPE which is the 1st ever weedcoin launched back in 2014 🔥 Dev or X community already messaged the founders since they have the creator fees 👉 Dope name too hahaha and today is 420 day and this is one of the best narratives for today I think Got shilled to me by a member and only $12K now so let's see how this will go 👀 HqqPyJcVMT2zC7Y7rRmhz74scD5qWgrgvXPNWcRtpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/hqqpyjc…
New XRP made today: $2M ATH so far New Bitcoin and new Solana made today too: almost $200K ATH for both 👉 PEPE from 2 years ago and name mentioned on official Pepe ETH website that reached billions of MC: still around $30K Much much higher for Pepe very soon 🚀🚀🚀
Literally one of the best narratives since Pepe official ETH website has that name 🔥 JE2hEa3xLKRhvLCiuDmRygZeEB1CRYzfjsN3VTHEpump
I made good money on Pepe on ETH a few years ago and Pepe by Matt Furie on Bags. Maybe this is the 3rd time to make another big money on Pepe 🚀🚀🚀
Aped OG Pepe with name "ShibaCumGMElonKishuTurboAssFlokiMoon" 👉 This is an OG coin from 2 years ago that only migrated earlier today and the official Pepe ETH site mentioned it https://www.pepe.vip/ 🔥🔥🔥 Really really good narrative for this new Pepe on SOL XRP with name "HarryPotterObamaPacman8INU" just pumped hard to almost $2M today so maybe this OG Pepe will be next. 👉 Only $25K MC now and lots of potential to…
🔥 Almost 3x here on Groklet SOL version Also aped ETH version earlier when a member shilled it to me and close to 3x there too Higher 🚀
Asteroid NOT yet confirmed mascot name I think but Groklet already confirmed many times since last year 👍 https://x.com/GrokletFanClub/status/2044930344806162884 Higher very soon hopefully 🚀
Groklet apparently celebrating his 1st birthday hahaha let's see https://x.com/GrokletFanClub/status/2045170715767288157 4qH8A5GxvRMZgpRFjXASc6U9HAoEzKeUqxY2dPB7pump
Aped 2 Groklet CAs Groklet is the mascot of Grok which was announced last year Both around $20K to $30K. One from last year and another also old CA that just migrated. 5xH2YdQsnzt85GjCbPBucXEjyjQy8iGfybGsZzDjpump 4qH8A5GxvRMZgpRFjXASc6U9HAoEzKeUqxY2dPB7pump Can pump maybe like Asteroid which I missed since I was offline 😭 Let's see 👀
UNC dev is repeatedly softshilling CIG 👀 Maybe he will officially shill it soon? Let's hope he does very soon. https://x.com/fibonacki/status/2044815659985408270
The UNC dev has been softshilling CIG on Bags too https://x.com/_Normi3/status/2044727532293849593 👉 Plus Finn is one of the mods 👀 Pepe on Bags recently pumped to millions after Matt claimed so Bags still gets good volume I guess. Much higher hopefully 🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PythagorasDev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 160,174 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pythagoras Calls” (@PythagorasDev), 4,208 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PythagorasDev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.