Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ربات لینک دهی پالس مویز

Bot

ربات لینک دهی پالس مویز

@Pulsemovez_bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

25,238monthly users

-9,641 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID8484823546
TypeBot
Username@Pulsemovez_bot
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pulsemovez_bot

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,23842,07233,65515 August 2026 — 34,879 monthly users15 August 2026 — 34,879 monthly users17 August 2026 — 40,222 monthly users19 August 2026 — 42,072 monthly users20 August 2026 — 40,371 monthly users24 August 2026 — 40,384 monthly users27 August 2026 — 36,441 monthly users28 August 2026 — 35,826 monthly users1 September 2026 — 34,866 monthly users3 September 2026 — 34,392 monthly users7 September 2026 — 32,968 monthly users10 September 2026 — 31,605 monthly users12 September 2026 — 31,001 monthly users16 September 2026 — 30,194 monthly users18 September 2026 — 25,238 monthly users15 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 35 days, net -9,641. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,713–44,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every monthly users count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)Monthly usersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:5625,238-4,956
16 Sept 2026, 04:4030,194-807
12 Sept 2026, 23:1431,001-604
10 Sept 2026, 20:0131,605-1,363
7 Sept 2026, 21:5432,968-1,424
3 Sept 2026, 09:5534,392-474
1 Sept 2026, 03:5534,866-960
28 Aug 2026, 02:1635,826-615
27 Aug 2026, 00:4636,441-3,943
24 Aug 2026, 07:3640,384+13
20 Aug 2026, 05:5240,371-1,701
19 Aug 2026, 07:5742,072+1,850
17 Aug 2026, 13:0440,222+5,343
15 Aug 2026, 02:2434,879no change
15 Aug 2026, 00:1534,879first reading

Engagement

No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ربات لینک دهی پالس مویز” (@Pulsemovez_bot), 25,238 monthly users as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pulsemovez_bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.