Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Pulsar Money Official Announcement

@PulsarMoneyApp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,376subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001926744175
TypeChannel
Username@PulsarMoneyApp
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PulsarMoneyApp

Growth

1,3761,3891,382.56 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,389 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,388 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,384 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,376 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,374–1,391 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:231,376-8
9 Aug 2026, 17:521,384-4
7 Aug 2026, 01:271,388-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:511,389no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:351,389first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.78%
avg views ÷ 1,376 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.5
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,590
Reactions total63
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈42 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Our next Pulsar Coffee Meetup lands in Cluj-Napoca. UNTOLD edition. 🇷🇴 Fri, August 7, 12:30 EEST. Co-hosted with #RhunaIO, five minutes from the #UntoldFestival main venue. A huge crowd is in Cluj this week. Ours will be at a coffee table, talking about where money is going next. RSVP! https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2085033991816818738?s=20

5 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈53 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Multi-currency accounts, the card, an earn module with #Morpho and #Steakhouse_fi, and now swaps with #lifiprotocol. All in one app. We have more to announce, but we would rather hear yours first. What is missing from the app you actually need? https://x.com/pulsarmoneyapp/status/2084995358338506858?s=46

5 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈56 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Pulsar is expanding its partnership with #RhunaIO, the financial and operating infrastructure behind some of the world's biggest live events. The joint stack for loyalty and payments is live at #UntoldFestival this week. 100+ global events ahead. https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2084969292521718240?s=20

4 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈75 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Pass KYC, get a card, and DeFi is one tap away. The entry point everyone was building against turned out to be the front door. A livestream with #Alex__Radu and #0xCerberus from lifiprotocol, on the value of the crypto cards boom and our integration. Thu, Aug 6th · 3pm CET https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2084632992551727186?s=20

4 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC≈71 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Rome, that was a good morning! Good coffee, great conversations. We have a few ideas already on the list for the next stop. Where should we show up next? https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2084580221861457981?s=20

3 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC≈75 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

It's crazy that kind of complexity still exists. Locked in to bring the solution. https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2084350249997353376?s=20

3 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈71 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Check your portfolio. Swap what you need. Spend it on the card. Same app, same balance, same account - managing what you hold and paying for things stopped being two different jobs. https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2084304551222644793?s=20

3 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC≈72 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Right now, getting the best deal on your money means hunting for it. Comparing rates, checking three apps, hoping you picked well. We think that work should sit with the technology, not with you. What is the one money decision you are tired of researching? https://x.com/pulsarmoneyapp/status/2084270626966278169?s=46

2 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC≈87 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

90% of cards settle in dollars only. That's a cut taken every time you spend outside them. At launch, Pulsar settles 1:1, in euros or dollars. What leaves your balance is what the thing costs. Local currencies follow. https://x.com/pulsarmoneyapp/status/2083923307804692865?s=46

2 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈88 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

$1B annualised in 131 days. Roughly doubled 110 days later. That curve says more about stablecoin payments than any forecast does. Congrats to the #wirexapp team! https://x.com/pulsarmoneyapp/status/2083912939614978330?s=46

1 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈100 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Most people think the map is finished. It isn't. There are markets no fintech app serves at all, and served markets where whole groups still get gated at the door. Pulsar is being built for both ends of that. More from #Alex__Radu from our livestream with #TimHaldorsson 👇 https://x.com/pulsarmoneyapp/status/2083508122149359912?s=46

31 Jul 2026, 15:51 UTC≈105 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Your money app knows more about your week than most people do. It should probably do something with that. Good weekend, everyone. What's the plan? https://x.com/PulsarMoneyApp/status/2083213613612032421?s=20

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PulsarMoneyApp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 283,156 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pulsar Money Official Announcement” (@PulsarMoneyApp), 1,376 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PulsarMoneyApp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.