Channel
@Psychologymahh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,122subscribers
+153 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003051991991 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Psychologymahh |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Psychologymahh |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 3,122 | -95 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 3,217 | +94 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 3,123 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:14 | 3,142 | +82 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 3,060 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 3,054 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 3,046 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 3,068 | +43 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 3,025 | -38 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 3,063 | +102 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 2,961 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 2,960 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 2,969 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
165 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 118 | 71.5% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 17.6% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 8.48% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 2.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 165 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📝شاید مهمترین کاری که برای مغزتون در سالمندی میتونید انجام بدید، این باشه که نگاهتون رو به پیری عوض کنین. پژوهشها نشون دادن افرادی که باورهای مثبتتری درباره سالمندی دارن، کمتر در معرض ابتلا به زوال عقل قرار میگیرن؛ حتی اگر ژن پرریسکی داشته باشن. یعنی اگه کسی فکر کنه "پیری یعنی ناتوانی، فراموشی و از دست دادن تواناییها"، این نگرش میتونه با استرس بیشتر، کاهش فعالیت ذهنی و اجتماعی، و حتی سبک زندگی ناسالمتر همراه …
❤3👏3👍1
طلاق پایان یک رابطه هست، نه پایان پدر یا مادر بودن. چیزی که برای کودک از خودِ جدایی دردناکتره، اینه که احساس کنه یکی از والدینش دیگه سهمی در زندگی اون نداره. @Psychologymahh
❤3👍3💔2
🧠پژوهشها نشون دادن که حافظه نقش مهمی تو شکلگیری هویت داره، اما ما موقع ساختن روایت شخصیمون از همه خاطرات استفاده نمیکنیم. ذهن با استفاده از نوعی مکانیسم غربالگری روانشناختی، خاطراتی رو انتخاب میکنه که جزئیات و بار هیجانی بیشتری دارن. بعد این خاطرات از یک آزمون معقول بودن (plausibility test) عبور میکنن تا مشخص بشه با تاریخچه کلی زندگی و تصویری که الان از خودمون داریم هماهنگ هستن یا نه. به همین دلیل، اگه نگاهمون …
❤4👏1
🪴کسی که دوستت داره، قرار نیست همیشه با تو موافق باشه، اما قراره همیشه به تو احترام بذاره. آدمها با تجربهها، باورها و نگاههای متفاوتی وارد رابطه میشن و طبیعیه که گاهی در بعضی موضوعات اختلاف نظر داشته باشن. اما چیزی که یه رابطه سالم رو میسازه، این نیست که هیچوقت مخالفتی وجود نداشته باشه؛ بلکه اینه که حتی در بین اختلافها، احترام از بین نره. کسی که تو رو دوست داره، میتونه با نظر تو مخالف باشه، اما قرار نیست احساسا…
❤5
🎙بحثی درباره کتاب "درباره پسران و مردان" | ریچارد ریوز | بخش دوم دکتر آذرخش مکری @Psychologymahh
❤8
📌بحثی درباره کتاب "درباره پسران و مردان" | ریچارد ریوز | بخش دوم دکتر آذرخش مکری @Psychologymahh
❤8
🎙بحثی درباره کتاب "درباره پسران و مردان" | ریچارد ریوز | بخش اول دکتر آذرخش مکری @Psychologymahh
❤8
📌بحثی درباره کتاب "درباره پسران و مردان" | ریچارد ریوز | بخش اول دکتر آذرخش مکری @Psychologymahh
❤8
🟡جمله زرد: کافیه فقط اراده کنی و از ته دل بخوای. تو میتونی به هر چیزی برسی. 💭واقعیت: اراده فقط یه متغیر کوچیک هست. موفقیت ترکیبی از تلاش، منابع در دسترس، ژنتیک، شرایط محیطی هست. تعیین اهداف واقعبینانه براساس ظرفیت های فعلی، خیلی سالم تر از توهم کنترل مطلق هست که در نهایت منجر به افسردگی میشه. 🟡جمله زرد: هیچ اتفاقی بی حکمت نیست؛ حتما دلیلی داشته که این درد رو کشیدی تا قوی تر بشی. 💭واقعیت: در دنیا اتفاقات تصادفی و تل…
❤7👏3
ما از زندگی بعضیا نمیریم چون دوستشون نداریم؛ میریم چون بالاخره فهمیدیم دوست داشتنِ یک نفر، دلیل کافی برای تحمل کردنِ هر چیزی نیست. @Psychologymahh
❤7👍2
📌الیزابت لفتوس، روانشناسی که تو زمینه حافظه و شناخت تخصص داشت، به تأثیر اطلاعات نادرست روی حافظه علاقهمند بود. اون با بررسی پروندههای قضایی و اهمیت شهادت شاهدان عینی، به این نتیجه رسید که این موضوع باید بهصورت علمی بررسی بشه. هدف اون این بود که نشون بده اطلاعاتی که پس از یه رویداد به افراد داده میشه، میتونه خاطرات اونها رو تغییر بده و روی تصمیمهای قضایی تأثیر بذاره. آزمایش اثر اطلاعات غلط لفتوس بهسرعت به یکی ا…
❤5👍3
📰آزمایش روانشناختی اثر اطلاعات غلط لفتوس (Loftus’ Misinformation Effect): در دهه ۱۹۷۰، جامعه آمریکا و بسیاری از کشورهای دیگه با تغییرات اجتماعی و فرهنگی مهمی روبهرو بودن. تو این دوره، روانشناسی بیشتر از گذشته مورد توجه قرار گرفت و موضوع حافظه، بهویژه تو زمینههای قانونی و قضایی، اهمیت بیشتری پیدا کرد. پژوهشگران به این موضوع علاقهمند شدن که دقت شهادت شاهدان عینی تا چه اندازه قابل اعتماد هست و آیا اطلاعات جدید میت…
❤5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Psychologymahh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 31 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روان ماه” (@Psychologymahh), 3,122 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psychologymahh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.