Channel
@PsychologicalFactsss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,752subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001237266418 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PsychologicalFactsss |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PsychologicalFactsss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 11,752 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 11,755 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 11,759 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 11,766 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 11,772 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 11,775 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 11,782 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 8 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (8 November 2025 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,878 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
333 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 276 | 82.9% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 6.91% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 5.71% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 1.20% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.601% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.601% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.3% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 333reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 8 November 2025 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
If you talk to yourself, you're not losing your mind — psychology says you're using it better than most. We've made talking to yourself a joke. The cartoon character mumbling to themselves. The "crazy" person on the street. But psychology tells a completely different story. Studies show that self-talk improves focus, problem-solving, and emotional regulation. When you verbalize your thoughts, you're not just hearin…
❤5
Psychology says: the people who always need to understand *why* something happened before they can move on aren't overthinking. They're doing the only emotional processing they were ever taught. You've been told to "just let it go." To stop dwelling. To move on faster. But here's the thing nobody tells you: your brain doesn't want closure. It wants coherence. It needs the pieces to fit before it can set the puzzle …
❤3👍1
Psychology says: people who can't rest without feeling guilty aren't lazy — they're running on a broken definition of productivity. You finally sit down after a long day. Within ten minutes, the guilt creeps in. "I should be doing something." "I'm wasting time." So you find a task — any task — just to make the discomfort go away. Here's what's actually happening: 1. Your worth got tied to output. Somewhere along t…
❤3
You weren't born feeling "not enough." Someone taught you that. Think about it: Who made you feel like your efforts were never sufficient? Who compared you to others until you started comparing yourself? Who dismissed your feelings long enough that you started dismissing them yourself? Here's what psychology tells us: The voice in your head that says "you're not good enough" isn't yours. It's an echo. A recording…
❤7❤🔥1
10 Powerful Daily Habits That Actually Work You are not stuck because you are lazy. You are stuck because you refuse to do the things that actually work. Every single day you wake up and tell yourself tomorrow will be different. But tomorrow, you do exactly what you did today—scrolling, delaying, and avoiding the work that actually matters. The gap between where you are and where you want to be isn’t about talent o…
❤20👍3
7 Conversation Starters That Attract ALL Women 1. The Direct Opener This one's risky, but when it works, it works incredibly well. It's simple: You approach her wherever she is - on the street, in a café, at a party, in a restaurant (preferably when she's alone) - and say: "Hey, I know it's a coincidence, but I thought you were really cute and I wanted to meet you". It's direct, without beating around the bush. …
❤12
11 UNPLEASANT TRUTHS 1. Neither your friends, nor your family, nor the world — no one owes you success, happiness, or respect. You must earn everything. 2. Bad things happen to good people, and hard work doesn’t always pay off. Accept it, adapt, and keep moving forward. 3. Don’t expect others to prioritize your needs. Most people think about themselves first; learn to do the same. 4. You can always make more mone…
❤12🔥2
What are some of the best pleasures of life? MOST UNDERRATED! Morning poop Pressure poop Passing gas during bloating First salary Consecutive salaries Dinner with parents while you’re paying Cracking the most competitive exams Orgasms Insulting or defeating your strongest opponent Views of the hills Getting famous on Instagram Seeing posts and stories about you Seeing your inbox filled with messages from…
❤11🤣4💩1🔥1🤔1
What are some truths about life nobody tells you? Initially, a woman often offers her body in return for love and care, and a man often offers love in return for sexual satisfaction. (Talking about the majority — a mutual transaction.) Don’t put your religion above your life. Religion is just a path, but life is far more vast than any single path. A book gives you information, but life experience gives you long-la…
❤13🔥5👍2👎2
They came to me with problems because they knew I wouldn’t just dismiss their feelings or immediately try to fix everything. I became someone people felt comfortable around. Not because I was trying to be likable, but because I made them feel seen. There’s something deeply powerful about that. In a world where everyone’s talking but nobody’s listening, being the person who actually hears people makes you stand out…
❤14🔥2
Here’s what kills most conversations. People can tell when you’re not really there. If you just stare at them with no expression and no reaction, they’ll assume you don’t care. They’ll stop sharing. The conversation dies right there. Think about it. Have you ever told someone something important and they just sat there, blank-faced? How did that feel? You probably didn’t want to keep talking. You probably felt stu…
❤17🔥3
The Most Ignored Social Skill (It Changed How People Treat Me) I didn’t change how I talk. I changed one tiny social habit, and people treated me completely differently. I used to think I was a good listener. I’d nod and stay quiet. But inside, I was just waiting for my turn to speak. Then I discovered something called active listening. But it’s not what you think. Most people imagine staying quiet while someone …
❤13🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @PsychologicalFactsss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 544,922 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psychological Facts - Mindset Therapy” (@PsychologicalFactsss), 11,752 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PsychologicalFactsss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.