3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,246–1,247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 17:22
1,247
+1
14 Sept 2026, 03:22
1,246
no change
14 Sept 2026, 02:47
1,246
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
154.6%
avg views ÷ 1,247 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.623%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held
19 (12 March 2025 – 13 September 2026)
Views total
3,855
Reactions total
24
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Sept 2026, 03:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
298 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
89
29.9%
👍
82
27.5%
👌
51
17.1%
👏
24
8.05%
🔥
22
7.38%
😍
9
3.02%
⚡
8
2.68%
💯
4
1.34%
🥰
4
1.34%
🙏
3
1.01%
🏆
2
0.671%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 298 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2025 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Psycho_texts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 March 2025 to 13 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💎 تحلیل نقل قول دونالد وینیکات
#quote
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🗣 وینیکات:
«حتی در شدیدترین حالتِ تسلیم و شکلگیری یک "شخصیت کاذب"، در جای پنهانی یک زندگی سرّی وجود دارد که به خاطر خلاقانه یا اصیل بودنش برای آن فرد، رضایتبخش است.»
🔶️ این نقل قول بخشی از کتاب بازی و واقعیت (Playing and Reality) هست که سال ۱۹۷۱ منتشر شده و بخشی از محتواش برگرفته از مقاله قبلی خودش یعنی Ego Distortion in Terms of Tr…
❓️ پایان دادن به فرایند درمان باید چجوری باشه؟
#رواندرمانی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔶️ فرایند پایان دادن به درمان به اندازهی خود درمان میتونه مهم باشه و در طول پروسهی درمان باید بهش توجه بشه و براش تلاش انجام بشه. تو این پست قراره یکم جزئیتر این موصوع بررسی بشه که دقیقا چه کارایی میتونیم در جهت داشتن یه پایان خوب انجام بدیم؟
✅️ هدف مشاوره و روان درمانی
اولین نکته اینه که فرایند پایان دادن به مش…
♦️ رویکرد درمان شناختی - رفتاری
Cognitive - Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
#رواندرمانی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔳 بنیانگذار / پیشرو
🔸️ آرون بک
🔳 اساس درمان
🔸️ اهمیت دادن به تفکر (شناخت) و عمل (رفتار).
🔸️ اهمیت دادن به برداشت انسان از واقعیت ، نه فقط واقعیت عینی.
🔸️ مثلث شناختی و تحریفهای شناختی.
🔸️ الزام بر فعال بودن مراجع (انجام دادن تکالیف)
🔸️ نظریههای یادگیری و شرطیسازی
🔸️ مهم بودن خودگویی…
✅️ منابع کنکور کارشناسی ارشد وزارت علوم (گرایش بالینی و عمومی)
💭 ۱۰ نکته برای مطالعه
📚 لیست کتابهایی که تو گروه سایکوتکست هست:
1️⃣ لیست اول
2️⃣ لیست دوم
3️⃣ لیست سوم
❗️ فایل بیش از ۹۰٪ منابع کنکور وزارت علوم و بهداشت تو لیستها هست.
‼️ علاوه بر اونا ، کتب تخصصی روانشناسی هم هستن که تا الآن به ۱۰۰ جلد کتاب رسیده و به مرور بیشتر هم میشه.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Channel: @Psycho_texts
Group: @Psycho_Texts_Group
Insta…
🛡 مکانیزم های دفاعی (قسمت ۱۵)
#روانکاوی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🟡 واپس روی توپوگرافیک (Topographic Regression)
فرد به جای مواجهه با رویدادها و موقعیتهای اضطرابآور ، میره میخوابه و رویا میبینه.
⏬️ مثال
ممکنه وسط بحث درباره یه موضوع خاص (مثلا مرگ) ، یکی از اشخاص بحث رو رها کنه و به خواب بره.
اگه روی این موصوع متمرکز بشیم و بررسی کنیم ، ممکنه به این نتیجه برسی که برای اون شخص یه موضوع تنشزا…
💎 تحلیل نقل قول هری استک سالیوان
#quote
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🗣 سالیوان:
«ما همه بیشتر از هر چیز دیگری، فقط انسانیم؛ چه شاد و موفق باشیم، چه راضی و بیتفاوت، چه بدبخت و دچار اختلال روانی، یا هر چیز دیگری.»
🔶️ این نقل قول بخشی از کتاب Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry هست.
🔶️ اینجا سالیوان قصد داره که فرضیه "اصل یگانگی نوع بشر" رو بیان کنه و خیلی واضح میاد همه رو تو دستهی "انسان" قرار میده و ت…
🔥 هیجان ها - خشم (۱)
#عمومی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔶️ قبلا تو این پست هیجان رو تعریف کردم و الآن به هیجان خشم میپردازیم که یکی از هیجانهای فراگیر هست. خشم هیجانیه که رویکرد روانکاوی تقریبا اونو هستهی مشکلات میدونه و تو درمان هم سعی در پیدا کردن علت این خشم داره. این هیجان اهمیت زیادی برای بقای انسان هم داره.
⁉️ چرا ایجاد خشم ایجاد میشه؟
کلیترین دلیل ایجاد خشم "وجود مانع برای رسیدن به هد…
🚫 #موقت
اگه وصلین که خیلی خوبه.
اما اگر وصل نیستین ، موقتا تو گروه ، کانفیگ و پروکسی میذاریم و به هم کمک میکنیم 👇🏼
https://t.me/Psycho_Texts_Group
❗️ این پست و این فعالیت کاملا موقته و بعد از دسترسی گسترده به اینترنت که حق طبیعیمون هست ، متوقف میشه.
بقیه فعالیتها تا دم و بازدم هست ، پا پرجاست 🩸👊🏼
💎 چرا مردم از رنج کشیدن لذت میبرن؟
(آدام فیلیپس - روانکاو)
#روانکاوی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔶️ چیزی که آدام فیلیپس اینجا (کلیپ رو تو کامنت اول ببینین) بهش اشاره میکنه مشابه چیزیه که لکان بهش میگه "ژوئیسانس" که به زبون خیلی خیلی ساده و سطحی بیانگر لذتی هست که اینقدر از آستانه بالاتر میره که تبدیل به درد میشه.
🔶️ فروید هم تو آثارش (مثلا فراسوی اصل لذت یا تمدن و ملالتهایش) به طور ضمنی بیان میکنه ک…
♦️ رویکرد حساسیت زدایی و پردازش مجدد از طریق حرکات چشم (EMDR)
#رواندرمانی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🔳 بنیانگذار / پیشرو
🔸️ فرانسین شاپیرو
🔳 اساس درمان
🔸️ مدل پردازش سازگارانه اطلاعات (Adaptive Information Processing - AIP)
🔸️ تمرکز بر رویداد تروماتیک و احساسات و حواس
🔸️ رویکردهای روانکاوی ، شناختی ، رفتاری ، شخص محور و تجربیات جسمانی.
🔳 اهداف درمان
🔸️ تغییر یا حذف اختلال در پردازش اطلاعات مر…
🛡 مکانیزم های دفاعی (قسمت ۱۴)
#روانکاوی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
🟠 واپس روی لیبیدویی (Libidinal Regression)
فردِ نوروز موقع فکر کردن به سکس و جراتمندی ، دچار اضطراب و احساس گناه میشه؛ به همین علت رفتار بچگونه پیش میگیره و از رفتار جنسی و پرخاشگری اجتناب میکنه.
⏬️ مثال
مردی که وارد بحران میانسالی شده ، برای از بین بردنِ احساسات ناخوشایند ناشی از این دوره رشدی به دوره نوجوانی واپس روی میکنه و …
🗣 اجزا و محتوای مصاحبه تشخیصی
#آسیب #آسیب_شناسی_روانی
کانال: Psycho_texts
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
1️⃣ شکایت اصلی (Chief Complaint)
تو این بخش علتِ مراجعه رو از زبان خودِ مراجع در حد یکی دو جمله باید پیدا کرد؛ طبیعتا این علت میتونه علتِ اصلی و یا یکی از پیامدهای مشکلِ اصلی مراجع باشه که مصاحبه حولِ این محور ، شکل میگیره.
2️⃣ تاریخچه بیماری فعلی (History of Present Illness)
تمرکز این قسمت بر مشکل و علائم فعلی …
🔥5👌2⚡1❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Psycho_texts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
درمان شناختی رفتاری CBT @CBTRAVAN1 · 22,424 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
صفر تا صد | ارشد روانشناسی @sefrtasad_arshad · 25,638 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psycho Texts | سایکو تکست” (@Psycho_texts), 1,247 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psycho_texts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.