Channel
@Psychiatry_Academy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,115subscribers
+199 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002158525589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Psychiatry_Academy |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Psychiatry_Academy |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 7 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 20:41 | 1,115 | +10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:25 | 1,105 | +19 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:17 | 1,086 | +30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 1,056 | +18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 1,038 | +20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:49 | 1,018 | +9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 1,009 | +40 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 969 | +41 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 17:02 | 928 | +8 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 920 | +4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 916 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
138 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 122 | 88.4% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 7.25% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.90% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.725% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.725% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 مستند | تطبیق «راه‌بورد» با بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 سؤال ۴۹ بورد ۱۴۰۵ ← سؤال ۱۰۵ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ راه‌بورد در سؤال بورد، نکته تعیین‌کننده در ارزیابی نارکولپسی (Narcolepsy) این بود که وجود REM latency کمتر از ۱۵ دقیقه در پلی‌سومنوگرافی (PSG) می‌تواند به‌عنوان SOREMP در نظر گرفته شود. این نکته، پیش از آزمون بورد در پاسخ تشریحی سؤال ۱۰۵ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ «راه‌بورد» به‌صورت صریح آموزش داده شده بود و cut-off پانزده‌دق…
👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
👏2
📌 مستند | تطبیق «راه‌بورد» با بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 سؤال ۴۳ بورد ۱۴۰۵ ← سؤال ۱۳۶ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ راه‌بورد در سؤال بورد، بیمار با باور کاملاً راسخ نسبت به بدشکلی بینی، با وجود ظاهر طبیعی، مطرح شده بود؛ یعنی اختلال بدریخت‌انگاری بدن (Body Dysmorphic Disorder) با بینش غایب / باور هذیانی. نکته تعیین‌کننده سؤال، انتخاب درمان دارویی مناسب بود: سرترالین (Sertraline). این مفهوم، پیش از آزمون بورد در سؤال ۱۳۶ آزمون جامع ش…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2
📌 مستند | تطبیق «راه‌بورد» با بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ 🎯 سؤال ۳۴ بورد ۱۴۰۵ ← سؤال ۱۱۸ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ راه‌بورد در سؤال بورد، بیمار با تابلوی کلاسیک مسمومیت آنتی‌کولینرژیک (Anticholinergic Toxicity) شامل خشکی پوست و مخاط، گرمی بدن، میدریاز، تاکی‌کاردی، آژیتاسیون و توهم بینایی مطرح شده بود و درمان مناسب فیزوستیگمین وریدی (IV Physostigmine) بود. این نکته، پیش از آزمون بورد در سؤال ۱۱۸ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ «راه‌بورد» با هما…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2
📚 سؤالات و پاسخ‌های آزمون KF بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ ✅📝 منبع:سایت سنجش پزشکی آکادمی آموزش روانپزشکی 💠@psychiatry_academy
❤4💯1
نکته تعیین‌کننده این سؤال، پیش از آزمون بورد در چند لایه از محتوای آکادمی پوشش داده شده بود: 📖 در کتاب Section 4 تاسمن 2024 آکادمی: صفحه ۲۴۴: معرفی پنج مؤلفه مدل PERMA صفحه ۲۴۶: تکرار و تأکید مجدد همان نکته در بخش «مرور سریع طلایی» 🎯 همچنین همین مفهوم در آزمون جامع شماره ۲ راه‌بورد، سؤال ۹ نیز پیش از بورد مورد سؤال قرار گرفته بود
❤5
📚 ردپای کتاب Section 4 تاسمن 2024 در آزمون بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ پس از تطبیق دقیق و سؤال‌به‌سؤال آزمون بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ با محتوای این کتاب: ✅ ۹ سؤال به‌صورت مستقیم با مطالب کتاب قابل پاسخ‌گویی بودند. 🔹 ۸ سؤال دیگر نیز پوشش مفهومی قوی در محتوای کتاب داشتند. یعنی در مجموع، ۱۷ سؤال آزمون بورد ۱۴۰۵ به‌صورت مستقیم یا مفهومی با محتوای Section 4 تاسمن 2024 هم‌پوشانی داشتند. 🎯 نکته قابل‌توجه این است که در چند مورد، همان ن…
❤4🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
مبارکتون باشه دکتر جان؛ خستگی این روزها با همین پیام‌ها از تن آدم درمیاد. 🙏🏻🌹
❤5
🚨 #فوری | نتایج آزمون گواهینامه و دانشنامه تخصصی پزشکی منتشر شد نتایج آزمون گواهینامه و دانشنامه تخصصی پزشکی در سایت مرکز سنجش آموزش پزشکی کشور منتشر شده است. 🌐 Sanjeshp.ir
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Psychiatry_Academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی آموزش روانپزشکی/دکتر هادی زیدآبادی نژاد” (@Psychiatry_Academy), 1,115 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psychiatry_Academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.