Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 117.4%
- avg views ÷ 916 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,080
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.642%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 221
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
138 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.4% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
17 Sept 2026, 17:44 UTC149 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 📌 مستند | تطبیق «راهبورد» با بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵
🎯 سؤال ۴۹ بورد ۱۴۰۵ ← سؤال ۱۰۵ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ راهبورد
در سؤال بورد، نکته تعیینکننده در ارزیابی نارکولپسی (Narcolepsy) این بود که وجود REM latency کمتر از ۱۵ دقیقه در پلیسومنوگرافی (PSG) میتواند بهعنوان SOREMP در نظر گرفته شود.
این نکته، پیش از آزمون بورد در پاسخ تشریحی سؤال ۱۰۵ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ «راهبورد» بهصورت صریح آموزش داده شده بود و cut-off پانزدهدق…
👏2
17 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTC144 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
👏2
17 Sept 2026, 17:13 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 📌 مستند | تطبیق «راهبورد» با بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵
🎯 سؤال ۴۳ بورد ۱۴۰۵ ← سؤال ۱۳۶ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ راهبورد
در سؤال بورد، بیمار با باور کاملاً راسخ نسبت به بدشکلی بینی، با وجود ظاهر طبیعی، مطرح شده بود؛ یعنی اختلال بدریختانگاری بدن (Body Dysmorphic Disorder) با بینش غایب / باور هذیانی.
نکته تعیینکننده سؤال، انتخاب درمان دارویی مناسب بود: سرترالین (Sertraline).
این مفهوم، پیش از آزمون بورد در سؤال ۱۳۶ آزمون جامع ش…
❤2
17 Sept 2026, 17:12 UTC144 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2
17 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC155 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 📌 مستند | تطبیق «راهبورد» با بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵
🎯 سؤال ۳۴ بورد ۱۴۰۵ ← سؤال ۱۱۸ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ راهبورد
در سؤال بورد، بیمار با تابلوی کلاسیک مسمومیت آنتیکولینرژیک (Anticholinergic Toxicity) شامل خشکی پوست و مخاط، گرمی بدن، میدریاز، تاکیکاردی، آژیتاسیون و توهم بینایی مطرح شده بود و درمان مناسب فیزوستیگمین وریدی (IV Physostigmine) بود.
این نکته، پیش از آزمون بورد در سؤال ۱۱۸ آزمون جامع شماره ۱ «راهبورد» با هما…
❤2
17 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC170 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2
16 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC294 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026 File
📚 سؤالات و پاسخهای آزمون KF بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ ✅📝
منبع:سایت سنجش پزشکی
آکادمی آموزش روانپزشکی
💠@psychiatry_academy
❤4💯1
15 Sept 2026, 03:12 UTC≈1,730 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
نکته تعیینکننده این سؤال، پیش از آزمون بورد در چند لایه از محتوای آکادمی پوشش داده شده بود:
📖 در کتاب Section 4 تاسمن 2024 آکادمی:
صفحه ۲۴۴: معرفی پنج مؤلفه مدل PERMA
صفحه ۲۴۶: تکرار و تأکید مجدد همان نکته در بخش «مرور سریع طلایی»
🎯 همچنین همین مفهوم در آزمون جامع شماره ۲ راهبورد، سؤال ۹ نیز پیش از بورد مورد سؤال قرار گرفته بود
❤5
15 Sept 2026, 02:56 UTC≈1,740 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
📚 ردپای کتاب Section 4 تاسمن 2024 در آزمون بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵
پس از تطبیق دقیق و سؤالبهسؤال آزمون بورد روانپزشکی ۱۴۰۵ با محتوای این کتاب:
✅ ۹ سؤال بهصورت مستقیم با مطالب کتاب قابل پاسخگویی بودند.
🔹 ۸ سؤال دیگر نیز پوشش مفهومی قوی در محتوای کتاب داشتند.
یعنی در مجموع، ۱۷ سؤال آزمون بورد ۱۴۰۵ بهصورت مستقیم یا مفهومی با محتوای Section 4 تاسمن 2024 همپوشانی داشتند.
🎯 نکته قابلتوجه این است که در چند مورد، همان ن…
❤4🙏1
12 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC≈2,030 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
9 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC≈2,460 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
مبارکتون باشه دکتر جان؛ خستگی این روزها با همین پیامها از تن آدم درمیاد. 🙏🏻🌹
❤5
9 Sept 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,440 views2 reactionsread 18 September 2026 🚨 #فوری | نتایج آزمون گواهینامه و دانشنامه تخصصی پزشکی منتشر شد
نتایج آزمون گواهینامه و دانشنامه تخصصی پزشکی در سایت مرکز سنجش آموزش پزشکی کشور منتشر شده است.
🌐 Sanjeshp.ir
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Psychiatry_Academy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mojtaba Shakori مجتبی شکوری
@mojtabashakoori_fan · 23,440
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026 This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی آموزش روانپزشکی/دکتر هادی زیدآبادی نژاد” (@Psychiatry_Academy), 916 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Psychiatry_Academy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.