Posted without readable text

Channel
PSC Prepmate
@Pscprepmate
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,866subscribers
-112 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001454381280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pscprepmate |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pscprepmate |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@Pscprepmate was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 2,866 | -17 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 05:22 | 2,883 | -58 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 2,941 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 2,953 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 2,957 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 2,964 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 2,969 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 2,974 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 2,978 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 2,978 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 23 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.34%
- avg views ÷ 2,866 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 182
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (23 October 2025 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,271 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 05:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 88.9% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💡 പ്രധാന വിവരങ്ങൾ : 🔹 നേട്ടം: തുടർച്ചയായ രണ്ടാം ഏഷ്യൻ ഗെയിംസിലാണ് ആൻസി സോജൻ വെള്ളി മെഡൽ നേടുന്നത്. 🔹 ദേശീയ റെക്കോർഡ്: ഈ വർഷം 6.88 മീറ്റർ ദൂരം ചാടി അഞ്ജു ബോബി ജോർജിന്റെ ദേശീയ റെക്കോർഡ് ആൻസി തിരുത്തിയെഴുതിയിരുന്നു. 🔹 സ്വർണ്ണ മെഡൽ ജേതാവ്: ഷിയോങ് ഷിയാങ് വാങ് (ചൈന)
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
From today onwards, this group will function as a dedicated PSC Community, following a steady, structured, and standardised plan for government job preparation. For everyone preparing for a government job, we aim to make this community your most valuable preparation asset. Our goal is to provide you with the right guidance, consistent study plans, useful resources, regular updates, and a supportive learning environm…
Registration link : https://forms.gle/T1xb19WbB1DyXL216 (Share with your friends) #promo
Signed Geralt of Rivia ㅤ
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- a) 1 and 2 only26%
- b) 2 and 3 only11%
- c) 1 and 3 only20%
- d) 1, 2 and 343%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Sreekala
Consider the following statements about the Hanle Dark Sky Reserve 1. It is India’s first dark sky reserve located in Hanle, Ladakh. 2. The reserve is managed jointly by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), the Union Territory of Ladakh, and the Ladakh Hill Development Council. 3. It is situated within the Changthang Wildlife Sanctuary.
❤1👍1
Signed Sreekala
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2182105 Ayushman Bharat Scheme launched in 2018. Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY) – Health insurance coverage for poor and vulnerable families. Ayushman Aarogya Mandirs (AAM) – Upgraded Health and Wellness Centres providing primary healthcare. Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) – Digital integration of health data and services. mi…
Signed Sreekala
Which of the following is not one of the four key pillars of the Ayushman Bharat Scheme?
- a) Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY)18%
- b) Ayushman Aarogya Mandirs (AAM)27%
- c) Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM)21%
- d) Ayushman Digital Card Yojana (ADCY)33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Sreekala
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @Pscprepmate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- a) 1 and 2 only26%
- b) 2 and 3 only11%
- c) 1 and 3 only20%
- d) 1, 2 and 343%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following is not one of the four key pillars of the Ayushman Bharat Scheme?
- a) Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Aarogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY)18%
- b) Ayushman Aarogya Mandirs (AAM)27%
- c) Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM)21%
- d) Ayushman Digital Card Yojana (ADCY)33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- a) 1 and 2 only36%
- b) 2 and 3 only14%
- c) 1 and 3 only18%
- d) 1, 2 and 333%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Select the correct answer using the code given below
- a) 1, 2 and 3 only19%
- b) 1, 3, 4 and 5 only26%
- c) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 534%
- d) 2, 3 and 5 only21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- a) 1 and 2 only35%
- b) 2 and 3 only24%
- c) 1 and 3 only15%
- d) 1, 2 and 326%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which of the following countries are allowed by the RBI to borrow Indian rupees (INR) from authorised dealer banks for cross-border transactions?
- a) Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka67%
- b) Bangladesh, Nepal and Maldives14%
- c) Bhutan, Myanmar and Sri Lanka8%
- d) Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 23 October 2025 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ZtechAirdrop · 74,563
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 27 August 2026
@ImteyazulHaque · 18,869
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 October 2026
@sarojmishrachannel · 33,000
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PSC Prepmate” (@Pscprepmate), 2,866 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pscprepmate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.