Channel
@ProyectoInvntario
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001197891799 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProyectoInvntario |
| Description | Datos abiertos y tecnología cívica para Cuba |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 7 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProyectoInvntario |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 18 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 April 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Día 159 (16/8/2020) Se suma un nuevo laboratorio a los 7 que hasta ahora habían estado haciendo pruebas PCR en tiempo real para detectar el SARS-CoV-2. En su primer día, el lab del Centro de Inmunología Molecular analizó 24 muestras. De los 8 laboratorios a cargo de estas pruebas, 6 están en La Habana
#actualización #Covid19 #coronavirus Día 159 (16/8/2020) Casos nuevos: +48 Paciente-Sexo-Nac-Edad-Viaje-Procedencia PRI (2): P.3317:👩🦰🇨🇺55 P.3318:👩🦰🇨🇺26 ART (2): P.3319:👩🦰🇨🇺44 P.3320:👩🦰🇨🇺38 HAB (43): P.3321:👩🦰🇨🇺75 P.3322:👨🇨🇺26 P.3323:👩🦰🇨🇺10 P.3324:👩🦰🇨🇺44 P.3325:👨🇨🇺16 P.3326:👩🦰🇨🇺46 P.3327:👩🦰🇨🇺36 P.3328:👩🦰🇨🇺6 P.3329:👩🦰🇨🇺26 P.3330:👨🇨🇺53 P.3331:👨🇨🇺41 P.3332:👨🇨🇺37 P.3333:👨🇨🇺52 P.3334:👨🇨🇺2 P.3335:👨🇨🇺6 mese…
Día 159 (16/8/2020) 72 altas - es la segunda cantidad más alta después del récord de 78 altas dadas el 4 de mayo Acumulado: 2692 https://bit.ly/2XsBSvq
#actualización #Covid19Cuba #covid19 #coronavirus Día 159 (16/8/2020) Confirmados nuevos: +48 Acumulado: 3364 Activos: 582 - Estables: 575 - Graves: 2 - Críticos: 5 Altas nuevas: +72 Acumulado: 2692 Fallecidos nuevos: +0 Acumulado: 88 Repatriados nuevos: +0 Acumulado: 2
pic.twitter.com/Y8TMzsYBp5 — invntario (@invntario) August 17, 2020
#actualización #Covid19 #Covid19Cuba Día 22 (1/4/2020) Cantidad de personas ingresadas al final del día (ojo: no son acumulados y no detallan altas ni nuevos ingresos) Total = 2320 Cubanos: ? Extranjeros: ?https://t.co/Kb58qfK77H pic.twitter.com/x35YiTfw8n— invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
3/ Si @ETECSA_Cuba tiene tantas ganas de publicar datos, la invitamos a publicar todos los datos de uso de telecoms en #Cuba en los últimos 90 días (mínimo) para que la ciudadanía pueda calcular y filtrar y visualizar el antes/después de las coms en tiempos de #Covid19. — invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
2/ No son "213 casos nuevos confirmados", @ETECSA_Cuba, son 21. Varios usuarios han respondido a ese tuit señalando el error numérico y el mal gusto de un emoji que han puesto, pero no vemos ninguna reacción hasta ahora.https://t.co/1FaKBSet4M— invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
1/ Que una fuente sea estatal no es una garantía mágica d la calidad y confiabilidad de lo que publica sobre #Covid19. Este tuit de @ETECSA_Cuba lleva como 2 horas circulando con información incorrecta sobre el estado de la pandemia en Cuba y nadie lo borra. https://t.co/zBjH0LQoxB — invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
2/ #actualización #Covid19Cuba En los municipios que ya tenían casos conocidos, los nuevos se distribuyeron así: Stgo. de Cuba: +3 Vnzla: +3 Consolación d Sur: +2 Cumanayagua: +2 Matanzas: +2 Con +1: Arroyo N. Cntro Hab Cerro Cienfuegos Diez de Oct Hab Vieja Mariel Nuevitas— invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
1/ #actualización #Covid19Cuba Día 22 (1/4/2020) Casos nuevos: +21⬆️ Acumulado: 233 Se suma 1 municipio nuevo al mapa de #COVID19 en #Cuba: Jagüey Grande (MTZ): +1 Fuente: @MinsapCuba 🗺️👉https://t.co/ziwLgsjDK9 pic.twitter.com/GiXoTFOrXO— invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
#actualización #Covid19Cuba Día 22 (1/4/2020) Se mantienen las mismas provincias en el mapa de #COVID19 en #Cuba +21 casos nuevos⬆️ distribuidos así: HAB: +5 CAV:+3 CFG:+3 MTZ:+3 SGO:+3 PRI:+2 ART:+1 CMG:+1 Fuente: @MinsapCuba 🗺️👉https://t.co/JX9XWujKq6 pic.twitter.com/VMCFF9fCbm— invntario (@invntario) April 2, 2020
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ProyectoInvntario. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ProyectoInvntario named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“inventario” (@ProyectoInvntario), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProyectoInvntario.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.