Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ProxyMars

Channel

ProxyMars

@ProxyMrs

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

204,819subscribers

+11,681 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002199302258
TypeChannel
Usernames@proxycj @ProxyMrs
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held126
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProxyMrs

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ProxyMrs/34976 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC@irotwit/292067 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@ProxyMrs/34985 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC@irotwit/292169 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC1.0015 hours
@irotwit/2927015 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC@ProxyMrs/35111 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@ProxyMrs/35118 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC@irotwit/2927416 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@ProxyMrs/35123 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC@irotwit/2927716 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC1.003.9 hours
@ProxyMrs/35202 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC@irotwit/2930320 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC1.0016 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@irotwit10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (8–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 273 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

190,508223,299206,903.5204,8197 August 202611 November 2026
126 measurements spanning 96 days, net +11,681. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 185,589–228,218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 126
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:54204,819-696
10 Nov 2026, 09:15205,515-88
9 Nov 2026, 22:44205,603-409
8 Nov 2026, 20:47206,012-76
8 Nov 2026, 17:20206,088-502
7 Nov 2026, 11:37206,590-27
7 Nov 2026, 10:55206,617-395
6 Nov 2026, 13:49207,012-36
6 Nov 2026, 13:10207,048-366
5 Nov 2026, 15:05207,414-68
5 Nov 2026, 11:59207,482-413
4 Nov 2026, 15:34207,895no change
4 Nov 2026, 15:27207,895-356
3 Nov 2026, 18:59208,251-50
3 Nov 2026, 17:38208,301-432
2 Nov 2026, 19:11208,733-61
2 Nov 2026, 16:59208,794-314
1 Nov 2026, 20:29209,108-64
1 Nov 2026, 17:55209,172-339
31 Oct 2026, 22:31209,511first reading

Engagement

578 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 578 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 30m
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 139 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

24,512 reactions across 506 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣9,98740.7%
🖕3,19313.0%
💔3,18313.0%
👍2,85711.7%
❤2,52010.3%
👎1,1424.66%
😍5422.21%
💩3631.48%
😭2701.10%
😢2350.959%
🕊1100.449%
🤡1100.449%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 517 of the 578 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,512 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 578 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 578 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProxyMrs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 578 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC226 views16 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

+ فکر کنم اصلا حموم نمیره، هر موقع میبینمش همون لباس تنشه. من:

🤣15❤1

5 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC237 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

🥇دنبال سایت معتبر و بین المللی برای شرط بندی می گردی⁉️ 🔥کمپانی بین المللی We pari همون انتخاب🔥 👑سایتی برای حرفه ای ها👑 🎁اولین واریز توی وی پاری 2 برابر شارژ میشی💖 🔔چرا این روزا همه وی پاری انتخاب میکنند⚠️ 💖شارژ امن از طریق کارت بانکی،ارزدیجیتال،ووچر 💖تسویه حساب سریع و بدون احراز 💖دارای مجوز رسمی Anjuan و curacao 😃😃😃😃 👑کد هدیه ثبت نام:GG007 👑ادرس سایت: http://til.ac/z5jcpGT 😢سرور فیلترشکن روی کشور مناس…

❤1

5 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC240 viewsread 5 September 2026

🥇معتبرترین سایت بین المللی شرط بندی که به ایرانیا خدمات میده✅ وقتش رسیده قید سایتا ایرانی بزنی و توی سایت بین المللی فعالیت کنی⚠️ https://t.me/+VKiCVNmMnFM2ZTU0

5 Sept 2026, 14:28 UTC747 views17 reactionsread 5 September 2026

کصشر ترین کفش شده ۱۹ میلیون معلومه همه هیت میدن پول بی ارزش شده کی میخاین بفهمین

👍16👎1

5 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,200 views38 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

این حرکت هم قشنگ هم نیست پروکسی / پروکسی @Proxycj

👍20🤣10👎8

5 Sept 2026, 12:50 UTC≈1,180 views38 reactionsread 5 September 2026

به بقالی محلمون اینو رایگان بهش بدی بر نمیداره

🤣32👍3🖕2👎1

5 Sept 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,150 views31 reactionsread 5 September 2026

خداشاهده بیا اینو برات تو شهرری تهران میگیرم ۹۰۰ تومن کردن تو پاچش

🤣25👍6

5 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,270 views64 reactions1 Starread 5 September 2026
Photo

این دختر کفش ۱۹ میلیونی که میخواست رو خرید و ازش رونمایی کرد: ملت کصشون خله

🤡37❤17👍5🖕5

5 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,360 views9 reactionsread 5 September 2026

یه استوری دیدم نوشته بود امروز قیمت خودرو کاهش پیدا کرد. نرخ دنا پلاس اتوماتیک رو دیدم ۳ میلیارد و ۳۷۰ میلیون بود! مشتی این کاهششه؟ 207 پانای اتومات هم شد ۳ میلیارد و ۲۰۰ پروکسی / پروکسی @Proxycj

💔5😢3❤1

5 Sept 2026, 11:17 UTC≈1,610 views31 reactionsread 5 September 2026

امید مردم تو سریال فرام از مردم تو ایران بیشتره

👍29❤1💔1

5 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,760 views47 reactionsread 5 September 2026
Photo

نه بابا من اصلا بین بچه‌هام فرق نمیذارم: پروکسی / پروکسی @Proxycj

🤣45❤1👎1

5 Sept 2026, 10:09 UTC≈1,820 views41 reactionsread 5 September 2026

این هندیا گاوم میپرستن عجیب نیست دست اژه ایم بوس کنن

🤣30👍10👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 578 posts we hold for @ProxyMrs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ProxyMrs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @ProxyMrs as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTCAnonymous Poll137 voters

پروکسی راضی هستید

  1. 👍36%
  2. 👎26%
  3. نظری ندارم47%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTCAnonymous Poll638 voters

🔴کنکور 1405 چطور بود؟

  1. عالی دادم5%
  2. معمولی دادم3%
  3. سنگین ریدم9%
  4. فردا قراره بدم5%
  5. قبلا دادم18%
  6. کلا ندادم و نميدم14%
  7. پسرم ، دیدن نتایج52%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 578 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ProxyMars” (@ProxyMrs), 204,819 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProxyMrs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.