В честь этого разрешаю вам поплакать
😭16👀5custom 52584263427975055414

Channel
@Provoscenari5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002651724646 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Provoscenari5 |
| Description | А где, собственно, провокация? Давайте включим воображение. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Provoscenari5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 108 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 108 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (20 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 914 |
| Reactions total | 370 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
370 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5452139289221553123 | 81 | 21.9% | |
| custom 5334518715012651135 | 62 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5258426342797505541 | 58 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5215399313181546542 | 48 | 13.0% | |
| 💋 | 48 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5199600220148607958 | 36 | 9.73% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 8.11% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 1.89% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 370reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Provoscenari5. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В честь этого разрешаю вам поплакать
😭16👀5custom 52584263427975055414
Пока поживём без комментариев...
😭14custom 52584263427975055417👀2custom 52153993131815465421
Шиншилламания✏ 🤩 Самый лучший красавчик на планете соизволил показать свою ножку #скетч
custom 525842634279750554114custom 545213928922155312311💋8
Никогда не поверю что это я начиркала 🤩 Иногда смотрю на свою работу и думаю что это делает совершенно другой человек #скетч
custom 519960022014860795810custom 521539931318154654210💋6custom 54521392892215531234custom 53345187150126511352
🖤🖤 💬💬✍️📜💬 🖤🖤 С @volkipischaaat ⭐ Или же о том, какие классные парнишки у нас получились друг для друга 🐰 🍙..Это был первый раз, когда я вообще делаю с кем-то подобный трейд , и честно, это был забавный опыт 🌟 🤩Что ж.. крылатые мальчики в вечном прайме 🌟 ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 👼 #трейд
custom 545213928922155312311custom 533451871501265113510custom 52153993131815465426custom 51996002201486079582custom 52584263427975055412
Ещё у меня есть ,с какой собачкой я каждого ассоциирую, вот. Да.
custom 51996002201486079589custom 52584263427975055416custom 53345187150126511354custom 54521392892215531231
🤔⁉️Наверное, они действительно понимают друг друга Покажу парочку вариантов, как они понимают друг друга. Конечно, везде есть свои недопонимания, но нельзя же понять кого-то на все 100? Поясню ещё проще: Беленький - капитан, у капитана со многими хорошие отношения, ведь для него это важно, чтобы команда работала достойно. Однако при общении с механиком у него пока возникают проблемы. Интересно, почему? Дотторепод…
custom 525842634279750554112custom 54521392892215531238custom 53345187150126511354custom 52153993131815465422
А, ну.. ещё в запасе у меня кое-что есть по тем новым чувакам...назовем их медузками, из-за названия организации — желешкафиш (Jellyfish). Знаете тренд: "ты меня понимаешь? " "Да, продолжай" Если да, то это жирный намек на то, что я выложу в скором времени. Так будет понятнее, что там между кем происходит. Выложу несколько, ведь получилось слишком много
custom 52584263427975055418custom 54521392892215531237custom 52153993131815465424custom 53345187150126511351
🤩💬💬💬🤩 Я немного лентяйничаю, поэтому держите вам скетчик с Руа-ковбоем. Постараюсь в скором времени сесть за ту полноценку с Руа и... кое-что ещё *Загадочная эпик музыка, под которую строят различные мрачные теории по фнафу* (И нет, это не намек)🩶 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ #персонажи #скетч #руа
custom 52153993131815465429💋7custom 53345187150126511357custom 54521392892215531233custom 52584263427975055411
⁉️ Я обратила внимание, что вы уже собрали нужно количество. Вы молодцы! Надеюсь в дальнейшем будем держаться в том же духе. Так вышло, что немного придется растянуть работу с Руа на какое-то время... Я приболела и только встаю на ноги 🫥. Рассчитываю на ваше понимание!
custom 51996002201486079588custom 53345187150126511357custom 54521392892215531235custom 52584263427975055412
🤩🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Опять этот тренд где мы не говорим друг другу кого рисуем. Да. Мне нравится этот тренд Как видите, я сделала его уже с другим человеком, но , к сожалению, с кем именно указать не смогу. Поймите! Она просто не хочет слышать, насколько она крутая. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ➖В общем.. Фредди и Адлер, кто-нибудь знает сигналис? Вам привет. (Два робота, какой же у нас синхрон 😢) #коллаб #фнаф #сигналис #тренд
💋12custom 53345187150126511359custom 52153993131815465428custom 54521392892215531234custom 51996002201486079581
🤩☺️едрав старой работы 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️е забываем про Руа и его изящество 🤩 ☺️ешила перерисовать эту работу, пусть и в скетчевом варианте. По канону рисовала пальцем на телефоне, чтобы результат вышел честным 🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ☺️сли наберёт много-много реактов (около 35-40), нарисую уже адекватно в крите 🤩 Как вам? Есть прогресс? (Или стилизация всё запорола) 🤩 #персонажи #арт #руа
custom 545213928922155312317custom 53345187150126511358custom 52153993131815465427custom 51996002201486079582custom 52584263427975055412
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Provoscenari5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 298,243 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Провокационный сценарий №5” (@Provoscenari5), 108 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Provoscenari5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.