Channel
@ProviantdesReisenden
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,121subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001340686469 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProviantdesReisenden |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProviantdesReisenden |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 2,121 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 2,118 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 2,119 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (26 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,968 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Grundlagen der Ahlu Sunnah im Takfir anhand von Beispiel von Bishr Al Marisi: 🔸Al Mu'iti -rahimahullah- sagte: "كنا عند يزيد بن هارون فذكروا المريسي ، فقال: ما يقول؟ قالوا : يقول القرآن مخلوق. فقال: هذا كافر." "Wir waren bei Yazid ibn Harun und sie erwähnten Bishr Al Marisi, da sagte er (Yazid ibn Harun): "Was sagt er?" Sie sagten: "Er sagt, der Quran ist erschaffen." Dann sagte er: "Dieser ist ein Kafir." 📖(Tar…
Ein letztes Statement zu Raheel Z., um zu erklären, wieso nicht mehr auf ihn eingegangen wird (und keiner soll mir mehr etwas von ihm schicken): - Jemand, der in jedem Video betont, dass ich ein Kopist bin und dann WORT WORTWÖRTLICH das Inhaltsverzeichnis von einem Jahmi namens Sultan Al 'Umairi klaut, ist kein ehrlicher Mensch. - Jemand, der private Sachen offenlegt, hat seine Vertrauenswürdigkeit verloren. - Je…
▪️Darf ich dem folgen, was Imam Ahmad hier sagte oder bin nur ich der Hadadi und Imam Ahmad, der sehr viele dieser deutlichen Feindschaft zu Abu Hanifa in Wort und Tat betrachte, bleibt ein Imam? Wenn Ahmad gefragt wird: "يُؤجرُ الرجلُ على بغضِ أصحابِ أبي حنيفةَ ؟ قَالَ : إي واللهِ." "Wird eine Person für den ABSCHEU/GROLL zu den Leuten von Abu Hanifa belohnt? Er sagte: Ay, WALLAHI." 📖(Masail Kausaj 3385) ▪️Ima…
Abu S. bringt nochmal ein Video, in dem er eigentlich ein Paradebeispiel bringt, für seinen unehrlichen Umgang mit dem Wissen. Er versucht auf die Aussage von mir einzugehen, dass keiner der Hadithgelehrten von Abu Hanifa überlieferte. Wobei ich erwähnt habe, dass in den 6 Hadithbüchern nichts von Abu Hanifa und nichts von seinen Gefährten erwähnt wurde. Also die Gelehrten, die Säulen, die Nuqad in diesem Bereich, h…
Die Sahaba haben ihre Schlachten gewonnen, obwohl die allermeisten von ihnen sicher keine ausgewogene Ernährung hatten und keiner von ihnen 24 Stunden am Tag trainiert hat. Die meisten von ihnen hatten nur ein Kleidungsstück, und manche konnten nicht einmal das Haus verlassen, wenn ihr Kleidungsstück dreckig war, weil sie kein anderes hatten und warten mussten, bis es wieder sauber war. Sie wussten, dass es nicht ha…
Abu Uthman -rahimahullah- sagte: "أتي عمر برجل في حد، فأتي بسوط فقال: أريد ألين من هذا، فأتي بسوط فيه لين فقال: أريد أشد من هذا، فأتي بسوط بين السوطين فقال: اضرب ولا يرى إبطك، وأعط كل عضو حقه." "Umar (ibnul Khattab) wurde ein Mann gebracht, der bestraft werden sollte. Man brachte ihm eine Peitsche und er sagte: "Ich möchte etwas Weicheres als das. Dann brachte man ihm eine (andere) Peitsche, die weicher war, und e…
- Warum ist das der letzte Kommentar? - Wieso ist es verweflich einer geschichtlichen Realität zu folgen? - Die Aussage von Muslim im At Tamyiz und die dazugehörigen Angelegenheit - Abu Saliha's damalige Interpretation zur Aussage von Ibn Abdil Barr - Eingestehung eines Fehlers - Ständige Relativierung statt Widerlegung - Abu Saliha's damaliger Kommentar zum Konsens von Ibn Hibban @ProviantdesReisenden
Eine Audio zu dem, was gestern über Abu Saliha heraus kam, wie er es kommentierte und was das eigentlich über ihn aussagt, möge Allah uns vor der Fitna bewahren, amin.
"Wer im Glashaus sitzt, sollte nicht mit Steinen werfen" Die Beleidigungen und unterschwelligen Seitenhiebe von Abu Saliha haben sich gemehrt und er kennt keine Grenzen mehr. Eine dieser Sachen, die er immer wieder erwähnt, ist, dass ich überhaupt keine Ahnung hätte, blind folge, eigentlich alles einfach aufnehme "Was man mir zum Fraß vorlegt" und es einfach nur nach labere. Doch dabei praktiziert er das, was er mi…
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Eine Antwort zur Audio von Abu Saliha in Bezug auf meinen Post - Hab ich behauptet, dass Abu Hanifas Irjah schlimmer ist als der, der anderen? - Wurde Abu Hanifa der Lüge bezichtigt? - Sind die "Hadaddiyah" wie er mich nennt, die einzigen die das über Abu Hanifas sagen? @ProviantdesReisenden
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ProviantdesReisenden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 292,550 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proviant des Reisenden” (@ProviantdesReisenden), 2,121 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProviantdesReisenden.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.