Red de Protección Animal - IUVRM🔻🐾 pinned a video

Channel
Red de Protección Animal - IUVRM🔻🐾
@ProteccionAnimal_IUVRM
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002125172572 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ProteccionAnimal_IUVRM |
| Description | Canal informativo oficial de la Red de Trabajo de Protección Animal de Izquierda Unida-Verdes de la Región de Murcia. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ProteccionAnimal_IUVRM |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 52 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 52 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 176
- Videos
- 37
- Links
- 131
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12m 22s
- Average length
- 1m 46s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 8 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 22 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨🐦 PP y Vox quieren blindar el sufrimiento animal en la Región de Murcia. Han aprobado iniciar el expediente para declarar BIC la caza de perdiz con reclamo: una práctica que mantiene aves enjauladas como señuelo para atraer a otras y abatirlas. ❌ Llamar cultura al sufrimiento no lo convierte en cultura. ❌ Llamar tradición al maltrato no lo legitima. Esto no va de mundo rural. Va de ética, de empatía y de los valo…
🤬1🤯1😱1
‼️🐤 La Asamblea Regional aprueba iniciar el expediente para blindar como BIC la caza con reclamo de perdiz La ultraderecha saca adelante en comisión de Educación y Cultura la protección como patrimonio cultural de una práctica cinegética cuestionada por colectivos animalistas, ecologistas y sociales. 📰 Toda la información a través de laprotesta.es https://laprotesta.es/2026/02/17/la-asamblea-regional-aprueba-decla…
‼️ VOX ha presentado en la Asamblea Regional una moción para declarar Bien de Interés Cultural la caza de perdiz con reclamo en la Región de Murcia. Hoy se debate en la Comisión de Educación y Cultura. ✅ Desde IU-Verdes nos oponemos rotundamente. Esta modalidad utiliza un macho enjaulado para atraer a otros ejemplares que terminan abatidos. No es patrimonio cultural: es la instrumentalización de un animal vivo. 🐦…
No es cultura, es tortura. Y queremos infancias libres de cualquier violencia. 📲 Bluesky | Instagram | TikTok
La tauromaquia es violencia. Y la infancia no se educa en la violencia. Desde la Red Animalista de IU-Verdes respaldamos a @SiraRego frente al lobby taurino: ni un niño más en las plazas, ni un euro público para torturar animales. Los derechos de la infancia no se negocian. 🛑🐂 🔻 Te lo cuenta el responsable de la Red de Animalistas de IU-Verdes, Dominic David Skerrett. 📲 Difunde y comparte en redes sociales: 📱 …
🔥2❤1👏1
🚨🐕 Izquierda Unida-Verdes denunciamos un nuevo caso de extrema crueldad animal en Torre Pacheco y exigimos penas realmente disuasorias Dominic David Skerrett, responsable de la Red de Animalistas Izquierda Unida Verdes, advierte de la normalización del maltrato animal en la Región de Murcia ante la falta de castigos ejemplares. 📲 Difunde y comparte en redes sociales: 📱 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/reel/141…
❤1👏1🔥1😢1
🚨🐕 En Torre Pacheco se ha denunciado un caso estremecedor: un perro fue golpeado, metido en una bolsa y arrojado a un contenedor, quedando gravemente herido. Este caso refleja, una vez más, que la ley actual, aunque tipifica el maltrato como delito, no protege suficientemente a los animales ni previene la violencia contra ellos. En España, los casos de maltrato animal se juzgan bajo el Código Penal, con penas de pri…
😢1
Red de Protección Animal - IUVRM🔻🐾 pinned a video
✊🐶 Ayer, en el #DíaMundialDelGalgo, salimos a las calles como cada año junto a colectivos animalistas y ecologistas para denunciar que la caza con perros es maltrato animal institucionalizado. Un negocio sostenido por una minoría de grandes propietarios de cotos, auténticos chiringuitos de la ultraderecha, que se lucra con la explotación y el abandono de galgos y podencos, recibe dinero público, incluso fondos europ…
❤1❤🔥1👍1👏1
❤️🐕 #DiaMundialDelGalgo | ¿Todos los políticos son iguales?... No! Un recuerdo de lo que hace @IUnida desde las concejalías de bienestar animal. 👇 📱 https://x.com/i/status/2018095080762982912
👏1
‼️ Murcia y Cartagena han salido hoy a la calle junto a más de 75 ciudades de todo el Estado en el Día Mundial del Galgo para decir basta a la caza con perros. Desde Izquierda Unida-Verdes nos hemos sumado a las movilizaciones convocadas por la Plataforma NAC – No a la Caza, denunciando el abandono, el maltrato y la violencia estructural que sufren miles de galgos, podencos y otros perros al final de cada temporada c…
❤1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ProteccionAnimal_IUVRM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Red de Protección Animal - IUVRM🔻🐾” (@ProteccionAnimal_IUVRM), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProteccionAnimal_IUVRM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.