Most people find the words after they're obvious. Early hunters find them first. $POTUS powers Proof of Word — turning everyday Solana transactions into a hunt for hidden dictionary words and sponsored terms. The chart is moving. The hunt is growing. The best discoveries don't stay hidden forever.

Channel
Proof of Word - $POTUS coin on Solana
@Proofofword
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
275subscribers
+19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003976229371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Proofofword |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 25 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Proofofword |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 275 | +19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 256 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 256 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.97%
- avg views ÷ 275 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13.7
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 41 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔥 Crypto rewards do not always need staking, farming, or complicated dashboards. Sometimes the trigger can be hidden inside the transaction itself. #ProofOfWord #Solana #Crypto
Proof of Word rewards blockchain users for discovering English words hidden inside transaction hashes.
Most people find the words after they're obvious. Early hunters find them first. $POTUS powers Proof of Word — turning everyday Solana transactions into a hunt for hidden dictionary words and sponsored terms. The chart is moving. The hunt is growing. The best discoveries don't stay hidden forever.
Historical Bitcoin prices on July 4th 🇺🇸 2013: $80 2014: $630 2015: $260 2016: $683 2017: $2,601 2018: $6,599 2019: $11,198 2020: $9,179 2021: $35,287 2022: $19,293 2023: $30,901 2024: $58,600 2025: $109,000 2026: $62,500 How about $POTUS?
More crypto users → more txs. More txs → more Proof of Word users. More Proof of Word users → more cashback. More cashback → more $POTUS holders. The flywheel only spins one way. 🚀
https://solscan.io/tx/2XrXF13PvvMDj2xEHQTuDn4gZ2twgyrVuMGpAnnvNuPSMCVLEXzCamERarY5RdAcfLjWGZtPyKNo95CajexfgjPE
📸 CAMERA found. We scanned the last 1,000 blockchain transactions linked to the collapsed FTX exchange... One of the rare 6-letter English words hidden inside transaction hashes was: CAMERA Blockchain preserves history. Sometimes... it even hides words inside it. #ProofOfWord #Crypto #Blockchain #FTX
🔥1
If you're a Solana trader/user making 5+ transactions a day, join Proof of Word and earn cashback on your trading activity. Trade more. Get rewarded. 🚀 #Solana #SOL #CryptoTrading #DeFi
One wallet claimed a 250 POTUS airdrop... Then immediately sold everything for roughly $0.30 and even closed the token account. But here's what our analysis showed: • Could have claimed up to 500 more POTUS through our Telegram bot. • Their last 1,000 blockchain transactions contained eligible word patterns worth 1,344 POTUS under our current reward model. Sometimes the biggest opportunity isn't today's market pr…
🥱1
Why Wait for Tomorrow When You Can Earn Today? Launching a token has never been easier. Every week, new crypto projects appear. Exchanges launch their own tokens. Wallets launch their own tokens. Infrastructure platforms, DeFi protocols, AI projects, and even blockchain tools introduce native assets to build communities and raise awareness. Many people buy these tokens for one simple reason: they believe the projec…
🔎 Hash analysis is usually technical and boring. Word hunting makes it visual, social, and surprisingly easy to understand. Would you check your own wallet for this? What would you do if your own transaction hash revealed a winning word? #ProofOfWord #Solana #Crypto
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Proofofword. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 987,336 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proof of Word - $POTUS coin on Solana” (@Proofofword), 275 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Proofofword.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.