Channel
@Proleo_io
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
195subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001727054241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Proleo_io |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Proleo_io |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 195 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 197 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 198 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 198 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 112 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Operator note: BIP-110’s voluntary 55% threshold is now out of reach before block 961,632. That does not make the next state automatic for every Bitcoin service. ⛏️ Keep four statuses separate: Miner signaling — bit 4 appears in a mined block. Node enforcement — BIP-110-enforcing software rejects non-signaling blocks during the mandatory window. Proposal activation — lock-in and the later start of data restrictio…
A useful structure for the next contentious DAO result: write the public record in three clear lines. 📝 Decision: What was approved or rejected? Dissent: What is the strongest good-faith objection that remains unresolved? Response: Will that concern change safeguards, monitoring, or a future review—and who will address it? This separates acknowledgment from veto power. The objection stays visible, the result stay…
PROVE number check: two current listings describe the August 5 unlock differently. 🧮 Gate: 208.33 million PROVE TradingView’s CoinMarketCal item: 203.33 million PROVE Difference: 5 million PROVE That gap needs a canonical answer from the project side: 1. Exact unlock total 2. Included allocation categories 3. Cutoff and time zone 4. Supporting vesting records 5. Named correction owner When public supply data conf…
When a community thread turns difficult, do not ask “supporter or hater?” Ask what kind of problem is actually present. 🔎 Use four response lanes: • Legitimate objection → acknowledge the concern and name the trade-off. • Factual error → correct the claim calmly and show the evidence. • Hostile speculation → explain what is known, unknown, and still unproven. • Coordinated abuse → enforce public behavioral rules co…
EU AI Act Article 50 is now applying, but “add an AI label” is not the whole answer. 🇪🇺 The practical split for Web3 teams: • Machine-readable mark: the generative AI provider makes synthetic output detectable. Existing systems covered by the transition have until 2 December for this duty. • Audience disclosure: the deployer clearly flags defined uses, including deepfakes and some AI-generated public-interest text.…
❤1
Aave access may narrow across six chains. 🧭 A governance proposal recommends winding down deployments on Sonic, Scroll, zkSync, Metis, Soneium, and Aptos. If approved: • New supply, borrowing, and fresh collateral use would be frozen. • Existing positions could remain open during an orderly exit. • Higher costs and lower supplier returns would encourage users to unwind rather than forcing positions closed. For te…
Campaign participant reality check: a task can be complete while the outcome is still conditional. 🧭 Read an incentive campaign in this order: 1. Action — What must you do? 2. Record — How is participation captured? 3. Eligibility — Which rules must still be satisfied? 4. Allocation — Is the amount fixed, capped, variable, or discretionary? 5. Distribution — What conditions and timing still apply? If the message j…
Deal boundary check: Payward has agreed to acquire Magic Labs’ wallet-as-a-service business. ⚙️ What moves after closing: • Embedded, non-custodial wallet infrastructure will join Payward Services. • Wallet customers are expected to transition to Payward’s platform. What stays separate: • Magic Labs is becoming Newton Labs. • Newton Labs will focus on Newton Protocol, its authorization layer for onchain finance. …
Quick founder-voice test: what level of responsibility does the sentence carry? 🧭 1. Personal viewpoint: what the founder believes. 2. Strategic intent: where the company wants to go. 3. Operational decision: what the company has approved or started. 4. Formal commitment: what the company promises, by when, and under whose ownership. The higher the level, the more proof the audience should expect. Before sharing t…
Sberbank is targeting December 1 for crypto trading infrastructure and a digital depository. The planned structure would record client ownership and process most transactions offchain, while active wallets support deposits, withdrawals, and transfers. 🔎 The key operational issue is reconciliation. A depository update and a blockchain movement do not necessarily occur at the same moment or represent the same stage. …
BitMEX has set more than one shutdown clock. 🚨 • New registrations have already stopped. • New positions stop on August 26 at 04:00 UTC; users can only reduce existing positions. • Positions may be force-closed during the wind-down and any remaining positions will be closed by September 23. • Exchange services end on September 23 at 04:00 UTC. • Balance, history and withdrawal access continues afterward, but funds l…
Quick test for the next Web3 partnership announcement: can you describe the exchange without using the word “partnership”? 🔎 Try this structure: Party A contributes ___. Party B contributes ___. The audience receives ___. The commitment stops at ___. Only then choose the label: • integration for product interoperability • distribution for audience or channel access • investment for capital • sponsorship for suppo…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Proleo_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proleo.io” (@Proleo_io), 195 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Proleo_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.