Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Profit Miners®

Channel

Profit Miners®

@ProfitMinersChannel

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

6,928subscribers

-399 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001217744166
TypeChannel
Username@ProfitMinersChannel
DescriptionProfits do not come by themselves. You have to work hard to get them. But don't worry, that's what we're here for. Ready to "mine" your profits ? Profit Miners®
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProfitMinersChannel

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 12 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP/596331 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC@ProfitMinersChannel/2568 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 19:36 UTC0.97under a minute
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP/574616 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC@ProfitMinersChannel/2351 · this entry16 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC0.97under a minute
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP/59877 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC@ProfitMinersChannel/2592 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC0.97under a minute
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP/575619 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC@ProfitMinersChannel/2361 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC0.96under a minute
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP/57229 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC@ProfitMinersChannel/2327 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC0.96under a minute
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP/59641 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC@ProfitMinersChannel/2569 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC0.95under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.96under a minute@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP (8–6)
@CoreDigest13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.96under a minutethis entry (13–0)
@wallstreetqueenofficial11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.97under a minute@wallstreetqueenofficial (11–0)
@tradercamps6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.95under a minutethis entry (4–2)
@wallstreetqueenofficialTG5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9737 minutesthis entry (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 21 of the 22 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 96 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 12 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @SmartMoneyTime. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 12 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,9287,3287,1287 August 2026 — 7,327 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,327 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,328 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,300 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,288 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,272 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,256 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,238 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,216 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,208 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,189 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,168 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,152 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,128 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,102 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,069 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,044 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,032 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,016 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,992 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,982 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,970 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,959 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,948 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,939 subscribers10 November 2026 — 6,928 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -399. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,868–7,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 11:186,928-11
6 Nov 2026, 22:086,939-9
4 Nov 2026, 03:376,948-11
1 Nov 2026, 02:386,959-11
29 Oct 2026, 02:596,970-12
25 Oct 2026, 21:106,982-10
22 Oct 2026, 14:366,992-24
19 Oct 2026, 01:287,016-16
15 Oct 2026, 22:067,032-12
13 Oct 2026, 03:107,044-25
6 Oct 2026, 19:597,069-33
29 Sept 2026, 19:207,102-26
19 Sept 2026, 03:587,128-24
15 Sept 2026, 02:427,152-16
11 Sept 2026, 17:397,168-21
6 Sept 2026, 20:007,189-19
2 Sept 2026, 11:337,208-8
30 Aug 2026, 12:047,216-22
27 Aug 2026, 02:267,238-18
23 Aug 2026, 16:087,256first reading

Engagement

116 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.34%
avg views ÷ 6,928 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
44
of 116 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held116 (26 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total7,121
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 17:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,170
Videos
≈1
Links
≈8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

9 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC95 viewsread 10 November 2026

#RSRUSDT UPDATE: All Targets done✅ 100% Profits booked with 10x Lev —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

9 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTC97 viewsread 10 November 2026

#ETHUSDT UPDATE: All Targets done ✅ 60% Profits booked with 20x Lev —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

8 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC127 viewsread 10 November 2026

#ARKM USDT Take-Profit target 1 ✅ Profit: 25.3807% 📈 Period: 6 hr 20 min ⏰ —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

8 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC124 viewsread 10 November 2026

#RSR USDT Take-Profit target 2 ✅ Profit: 36.5854% 📈 Period: 5 hr 54 min ⏰ —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

8 Nov 2026, 17:22 UTC117 viewsread 10 November 2026

#RSR USDT Take-Profit target 1 ✅ Profit: 24.3902% 📈 Period: 3 hr 18 min ⏰ —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

8 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC121 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#RSRUSDT Direction: LONG Leverage: 10x Enter Between: 0.001640 - 0.001580 Targets: 0.001680 - 0.001720 - 0.001760 - 0.001800 Stop Loss: 0.001540 —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

8 Nov 2026, 10:33 UTC111 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#ARKMUSDT Direction: SHORT Leverage: 10x Enter Between: 0.0985 - 0.1010 Targets: 0.0960 - 0.0940 - 0.0915 - 0.0890 - 0.0860 Stop Loss: 0.1030 —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

7 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC140 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#ETHUSDT UPDATE: It is rejecting from the resistance zone. We can expect a dump towards the lower support, or in case it pumps and breaks above the resistance zone, the setup will be invalid. Keep an eye on it and stay tuned with us for further updates. —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

7 Nov 2026, 07:37 UTC142 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#ETHUSDT Direction: SHORT Leverage: 20x Enter Between: 2243 - 2256 Targets: 2228 - 2212 - 2192 - 2176 Stop Loss: 2272 —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

7 Nov 2026, 07:25 UTC132 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#BTCUSDT UPDATE: It is currently in a consolidation phase and moving inside a symmetrical triangle. Possible scenarios are that if the price dumps and breaks below the triangle and the zone, we can expect a drop. Otherwise, if the price pumps and breaks above the triangle and the zone, we can expect a short-term pump, but the market looks bearish, so we expect a breakdown from here. Keep an eye on it and stay tuned f…

7 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC141 viewsread 10 November 2026

Due to the spot market being closed for the weekend, there is no movement; let's hold this scalp trade until Monday, and for the weekend, we can scalp Bitcoin and Ethereum. —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

6 Nov 2026, 18:36 UTC157 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

#XAUUSDT Direction: LONG Leverage: 60x Enter Between: 4076 - 4060 Targets: 4088 - 4108 - 4124 - 4140 Stop Loss: 4048 —―—―——――—―—―—―—―—―—―—― Profit Miners®

Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @ProfitMinersChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

Do you guys like our gold trades?

  1. Yes67%
  2. No33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Nov 2026, 18:44 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Family, are you interested in gold trades?

  1. Yes93%
  2. No7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Profit Miners®” (@ProfitMinersChannel), 6,928 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProfitMinersChannel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.