Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Huquq fanidan NATIJALAR 2026-yil BMBA

Channel

Huquq fanidan NATIJALAR 2026-yil BMBA

@Proff_huquq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

4subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004332594921
TypeChannel
Username@Proff_huquq
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 3 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Proff_huquq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4657 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 22:484-1
15 Aug 2026, 13:225-1
12 Aug 2026, 20:476no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:486first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤250.0%
😁250.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC59 viewsread 12 August 2026

Onlaynchi repetitorlar ham buni yaxshi biladi. Boshida aytganimday ular kamida bir yil huquq fanidan tayyorgarlik ko‘rgan o‘quvchiga ozgina 🤏 maʼlumotlarni beradi va o‘ziniki qilib oladi. Lekin aslida natija oflayn o‘qitgan repetitorlarniki.

1 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Endi savol tug‘iladi. NOLDAN boshlab HUQUQ fanini BIR OYDA yoki IKKI OYDA mukammal o‘qib DTMdan 30/27 ta ishlasa bo‘ladi. Buni huquq fanidan repetitorlik qilayotgan ustozlarga ayting va iloji bo‘lsa uzoqroq o‘tiring, sababi quloq chakkanggiz aralash solib yuborishi mumkin

😁2

1 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026

Oxirida esa anavi Onlaynchi repetitor abituriyentdan DTMda huquqdan nechata ishlaganini so‘raydi, agar abituriyent 17-18 ta ishladim desa abituriyentni onlayn o‘quvchisini 17-18 talik natijasini o‘sha kanalariga tashlamaydi. 25-26-27 ta ishlagan bo‘lsa tezda natijani so‘rab oladiyuuuuuu kanaliga bayroq qiladi "Mana manda bir oyda tayyorgarlik ko‘rib huquq fanidan 30/27 ishladi" deb.

1 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC52 viewsread 12 August 2026

Vaholangki bir yoki ikki oy qolganda DTM imtihoniga tayyorgarlik ko‘rishi kerak. Anavi ONLAYNCHI repetitorlarni reklamalariga ishonib PULLIK KANALIGA qo‘shiladi. Lekin o‘zi kursga boradigan huquq fanidan ustozi o‘rgatgan bilimlaridan ortiqcha faqat boshqa repetitorlar tuzgan testdan boshqa hech narsa olmaydi.

1 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC50 viewsread 12 August 2026

Bir yoki ikki yil NOLDAN huquqni "H" harfini ham tushunmaydigan o‘quvchiga NOLDAN dars berib uni savodini chiqargan ustozi bo‘ladi. Onlaynchi repetitorlar o‘zlarini kanallarida "O‘ZLARICHA BOSHQALAR TUZOLMAYDIGAN TEST TUZAMAN DEB JAR SOLIB" har qanaqa reklamalarga aldanadigan, ishonadigan abituriyentni ONLAYN KURSLARIGA TORTADI.

1 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026

Onlaynchi repetitorlar bu — birovni mehnatini o‘ziniki qilib oladigan(Ekspluatatsiya)lar deb hisoblayman. Bunga asoslarim ham bor.

1 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC49 viewsread 12 August 2026

Hurmatli ABITURIYENTLAR Mani o‘quvchilarim ko‘pchilik ABITURIYENTGA O‘XSHAB ONLAYN kurslarda o‘qimaydi. Sababi ularga ONLAYN KURSLAR KERAK HAM BO‘LMAYDI. Hozirda ko‘pchilik repetitorlar o‘zlarini VALLOMAT DEB BILADI. Onlayn kurs o‘tib o‘quvchini yuqori natijaga ko‘tarib bo‘lmaydi. ☝️Bo‘lishi mumkin FAQAT u o‘quvchi OFLAYN qaysidir repetitor USTOZLARDAN huquqni barcha sir-asrorlarini o‘rganib bo‘lgan va hozir ham o‘…

1 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Bu NATIJALAR 7-8 oy davomida qo‘lga kiritilgan. Eng asosiysi bu o‘quvchilarning ko‘pchiligi 9-10-sinf o‘quvchilari. Aksariyat 11-sinf o‘quvchilari qilolmagan yuqori NATIJALARNI mani 9-10-sinf o‘quvchilarim qayd etdi. Hali ularda yana1-2 yil bor o‘qishga topshirishlari uchun. Lekin hozirda qayt etgan natijlari HUQUQ FANIDAN MILLIY SERTIFIKAT imtihoniga tayyor ekanligidan dalolatdir.

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Proff_huquq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Huquq fanidan NATIJALAR 2026-yil BMBA” (@Proff_huquq), 4 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Proff_huquq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.