А как вы думаете?
- Хорошая идея, можно попробовать70%
- Не хочу, буду отдыхать13%
- Не думаю, что Новый год хорошее время для запуска17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4❤1👌1👎1

Channel
@Prodazhi_MSeagull
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
82subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001503036261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Prodazhi_MSeagull |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Prodazhi_MSeagull |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:41 | 82 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 83 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 83 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
282 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 126 | 44.7% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 16.3% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 12.1% | |
| 👌 | 19 | 6.74% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 5.67% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 4.96% | |
| 💩 | 7 | 2.48% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| ☃ | 2 | 0.709% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.709% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.355% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.355% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.355% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.355% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.355% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2023 to 5 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Prodazhi_MSeagull. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2023 to 5 December 2023. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А как вы думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍4❤1👌1👎1
💬На прошлый Новый год решили поэкспериментировать и сделали запуск 03 января. И о чудо😮 на продающий вэб пришло 270 человек. Позже несколько раз пробовали повторить этот рекорд, но бесполезно… Лично я был удивлен. Но подумав, понял, что это отличное время для привлечения внимания людей. ✅Во-первых, люди уже за пару дней наелись и напились, а время свободное есть. Куда его девать😏 ✅Во-вторых, раз есть время, значи…
👍3☃2🤔2❤1👌1
Опрос
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6💩4👌1🤔1
🗣В продажах люди чаще хотят узнать какие-то механики. Но я заметил такую мистику: одни и те же инструменты, но у одного идет, а у другого нет. Сегодня зашел в канал одного таргетолога👨💻 в телеге. Видно что парень знает свое дело. Но проскролив его посты, я увидел одну общую тенденцию: разнос всех его коллег по цеху, все дураки и делают все не так. А смысл простой: они все непрофессионалы, а я «Мастер Йодо» в продаж…
👍5💩3❤🔥2👌1🔥1
🆕На днях общались с одним из наших постоянных заказчиков. Посетовал, что менеджеры сливают маленькие заказы, а берут крупные. С них выхлопа больше и процент для менеджеров тоже выше. Хотя по факту для небольших заказчиков и цены выше, а значит больше и профиты кампании. Просто с мелочевкой менеджеры не хотят возиться, типа рутина. Но лиды с больших и маленьких в итоге ложатся только на обработанные крупные заказы. …
👍5🔥2👌1👎1💊1
🗣Привет дорогие Есть теория в науке, что прогресс это путь не от простого к сложному, а наоборот - от сложного к простому. Вижу, что все больше в интернет маркетинге актуальными и эффективными становятся не сложные многоуровневые воронки, замысловатые схемы продвижения и лабиринты клиента в наших непонятных ему тоннелях продаж, а наоборот - ЧЕМ ПРОЩЕ ТЕМ ЛУЧШЕ ВОТ МОИ РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ⬇️ ✔️Люди ждут нашей открытости…
👍8❤3🔥3👌2
Получить консультацию📌
♾В начале октября анонсировали старт работы сервиса МТС Маркетолог, на котором можно запускать официальный таргет в Telegram. Да еще и без первоначального депозита в 💸1500. Я сначала было обрадовался, что можно заводить клиентов и без больших бюджетов, но потом подумал, что теперь таргет в телеге превратится в мусорку, в которой будут все кому не лень. И как полагается созвонился со службой поддержки, чтобы узнать …
👍6👌2🔥2🤔2
🔝Есть клиенты с кем я работаю уже несколько лет. И вижу в их успехе и росте также и свой успех. Но нередки случаи когда человек зашел на минимальном бюджете, что-то потестил и свернул удочки. Это мышление. Так сложно выстроить эффективную систему продаж и продвижения в интернете. Приведу пример. Андрей Половков (на фото🔼): ✔️Инвестор ✔️Блогер ✔️Депутат ✔️И обладатель крупного пула коммерческой недвижимости. Он нач…
👍12🔥8🥰2❤1👏1
Ты удовлетворён как выстроены твои продажи и продвижение в интернете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤7👍7👏1🔥1🥰1
👋Перелеты. Кто спит, кто в телефоне сидит. Для меня хорошее время подумать… 💬Предлагаю вопрос к размышлению, а после посмотрим статистику друзья!
👌7👍3🤔3❤2🔥2
Что для вас ближе:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥3👍2❤1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Prodazhi_MSeagull. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А как вы думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Опрос
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ты удовлетворён как выстроены твои продажи и продвижение в интернете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что для вас ближе:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2023 to 5 December 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Proдаем в интернете с Михаилом Сигал” (@Prodazhi_MSeagull), 82 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Prodazhi_MSeagull.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.