Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Procreate Brushes by Max Ulichney

@ProcreateApp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12,186subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457612863
TypeChannel
Username@ProcreateApp
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 December 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProcreateApp

Growth

12,16612,18612,1767 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,166 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,171 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,173 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,178 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,181 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,186 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,163–12,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:1712,186+5
11 Aug 2026, 23:1412,181+3
11 Aug 2026, 00:1812,178+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:3412,173+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:5312,171+5
8 Aug 2026, 03:0412,166-5
7 Aug 2026, 15:3012,171no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:2312,171first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 30 December 2020the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

988 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75876.7%
❤‍🔥595.97%
🔥525.26%
👍383.85%
😡292.94%
💋141.42%
🌭121.21%
🤗90.911%
60.607%
🥰40.405%
🦄30.304%
💩20.202%
👎10.101%
😍10.101%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 988reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2020 to 27 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2024, 05:01 UTC≈38,800 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @free_brushesPhoto

Lee Eun's Oil Brushes for Procreate Скачать: t.me/procreatezip/333

114🔥15👍12💩2🥰1

30 Jul 2023, 14:00 UTC≈78,900 views334 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

243❤‍🔥39😡29🌭12👍11

30 Jul 2023, 13:59 UTC≈65,000 views340 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Oil MaxPack - Brushes for Procreate

260🔥37❤‍🔥20💋14🤗9

30 Dec 2020, 17:02 UTC≈70,300 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

536👍3🦄3

30 Dec 2020, 16:56 UTC≈61,300 views105 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Retro MaxPack - Brushes for Procreate

88👍12🥰3👎1😍1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @ProcreateApp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Procreate Brushes by Max Ulichney” (@ProcreateApp), 12,186 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProcreateApp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.