Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Все про QA | Pro-Test.studio

Channel

Все про QA | Pro-Test.studio

@Pro_Test_studio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,068subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001821302123
TypeChannel
Username@Pro_Test_studio
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pro_Test_studio

Growth

1,0681,0751,071.58 August 2026 — 1,075 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,073 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,068 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,069 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,068 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,069 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,068 subscribers8 August 202610 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 34 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,067–1,076 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 16:401,068-1
30 Aug 2026, 01:031,069+1
26 Aug 2026, 19:041,068-1
17 Aug 2026, 22:341,069+1
14 Aug 2026, 21:431,068-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:411,073-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:321,075no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:321,075first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

211 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5827.5%
😁4822.7%
👍3818.0%
🤣3717.5%
209.48%
💯52.37%
🌚20.948%
🎉20.948%
😍10.474%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 211 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 20 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
354
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
383
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
empotencyKey110 September 202510 September 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 20 September 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2025, 07:36 UTC585 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Загадочные символы в отчете Тестируем экспорт отчёта в CSV. В файле вместо кириллических букв: Список клиентов ❓ В чём настоящая проблема? Отмечайте правильный эмодзи ❤️🤩🌚🔥

🔥19

17 Sept 2025, 09:21 UTC467 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А что, так можно было? 👀 if (day == Wednesday) {  print(“Маленькая пятница 🎉”); }

🔥7😁7🤣6👍1

15 Sept 2025, 07:42 UTC500 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🤷‍♂️ Как воспроизвести «невоспроизводимый» баг через HAR-логи Один из самых бесящих кейсов: у пользователя баг случается, а у тебя — нет. Решение простое: попроси HAR-лог. 1️⃣ Что такое HAR HAR (HTTP Archive) — это история всех запросов/ответов браузера: заголовки, куки, тело запросов. Можно вытащить прямо из DevTools. 2️⃣ Как выгрузить В Chrome DevTools → Network: — включи галочку Preserve log — повтори шаги, где

👍6

13 Sept 2025, 07:56 UTC404 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Выходные — для отдыха, а не для рабочих чатов 😉 Берегите себя и свою психику 💙

😁7🤣6💯3

12 Sept 2025, 06:03 UTC396 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

📌 Инструмент недели: Bug Magnet Минималистичное расширение для браузера, которое экономит массу времени на ручных проверках. Что умеет: ➡️ В один клик подставляет популярные edge-cases в поля ввода (длинные строки, спецсимволы, SQL-инъекции, email с «+» и др.) ➡️ Помогает проверить поведение форм без утомительного копипаста тестовых данных ➡️ Работает прямо из контекстного меню браузера ➡️ Позволяет добавлять свои

🔥9

10 Sept 2025, 10:40 UTC369 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Правильный ответ

  1. 🔵Клиент некорректно генерирует orderldempotencyKey и шлет повторяющиеся ключи51%
  2. 🔵Сервер неправильно настроен и обрабатывает ошибки как 409 вместо 50511%
  3. 🔵Проблема в балансировщике - он дублирует запросы14%
  4. 🔵Это баг базы данных, не справляющейся с нагрузкой25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Sept 2025, 10:37 UTC354 viewsread 8 August 2026
Advertisementerid empotencyKey

🤔 Задача — API Вы тестируете метод POST /orders, который создаёт заказ. ✔️ Ожидаемый результат при успехе: 201 Created + JSON с данными заказа. При нагрузочном тесте (~300 req/sec) замечаете: ➡️Иногда вместо 201 приходит 409 Conflict. ➡️ В ответе сервера сообщение: "Duplicate order detected". ➡️В логах видно, что повторные запросы с одинаковым orderIdempotencyKey сервер считает дубликатами. Что это означает❓

10 Sept 2025, 07:02 UTC348 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

📹 Вот так примерно выглядит нагрузочное тестирование со стороны 🤣🤣 Напоминаю: среда — это маленькая пятница 🍉✨ Запасаемся настроением, неделя почти позади

🤣10👍3😁3🌚1

9 Sept 2025, 07:00 UTC318 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩵Эксклюзивная вакансия ко Дню тестировщика — Senior Bug Hunter! Обязанности: 🩷Ловить баги в коде и в жизни быстрее, чем они успевают воспроизвестись. 🩷Поддерживать стабильность команды даже в режиме продакшн. 🩷Прокачивать скилл «вижу всё» до 99 lvl. Мы предлагаем: 🟣Бесконечный поток интересных кейсов (и только с результатом passed). 🩷Премии в виде кайфа от чистого билда. 🟣Тимлида по имени «Удача» и заказчика под ни

17🔥3🎉2😍1

5 Sept 2025, 08:06 UTC396 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🐢 Симулируем плохой интернет прямо в терминале Иногда баги вылезают только «на медленном интернете». Но где взять настоящий 3G или убитый Wi-Fi под рукой? 📌 Выручает встроенный инструмент tc — он умеет эмулировать задержки, потери и дублирование пакетов прямо на уровне ОС: sudo tc qdisc add dev lo root netem delay 600ms loss 15% duplicate 5% Что это значит: ➖delay 600ms → каждое соединение тормозит на 0.6 сек ➖l

👍9🔥6

3 Sept 2025, 09:11 UTC361 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какой язык чаще всего вызывает проблемы при тестировании локализации❓

  1. Английский🇬🇧6%
  2. Французский🇫🇷33%
  3. Немецкий🇩🇪29%
  4. Испанский🇪🇸32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Pro_Test_studio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Sept 2025, 10:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz65 voters

Правильный ответ

  1. 🔵Клиент некорректно генерирует orderldempotencyKey и шлет повторяющиеся ключи51%
  2. 🔵Сервер неправильно настроен и обрабатывает ошибки как 409 вместо 50511%
  3. 🔵Проблема в балансировщике - он дублирует запросы14%
  4. 🔵Это баг базы данных, не справляющейся с нагрузкой25%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Sept 2025, 09:11 UTCAnonymous Quiz72 voters

Какой язык чаще всего вызывает проблемы при тестировании локализации❓

  1. Английский🇬🇧6%
  2. Французский🇫🇷33%
  3. Немецкий🇩🇪29%
  4. Испанский🇪🇸32%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2025, 11:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz97 voters

Какой реальный объект стал "первым официально задокументированным багом" в истории IT ❓

  1. Таракан 🪳29%
  2. Моль 🦋30%
  3. Жук-скарабей 🪲37%
  4. Комар 🦟4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2025, 07:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz75 voters

🤔

  1. Формат даты: дд.мм.гггг8%
  2. Возраст не меньше 18 лет16%
  3. Дата не в будущем20%
  4. Дата не раньше 01.01.190017%
  5. День рождения не может быть сегодня19%
  6. 29 февраля - только в высокосный год20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 August 2025 to 20 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Artsiom Rusau QA Life - Тестировщик с нуля
@qachanell · 30,252
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Все про QA | Pro-Test.studio” (@Pro_Test_studio), 1,068 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pro_Test_studio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.