Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПроРечь

Channel

ПроРечь

@ProRechLC

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,649subscribers

+1,934 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002062343097
TypeChannel
Username@ProRechLC
DescriptionЛогопед высшей квалификационной категории. За плечами 19 лет практической работы с детьми с различными нарушениями развития. Автор более 20 научных статей. Член психолого-педагогического консилиума. Связь со мной https://t.me/Anokhina_EA 📍Москва
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ProRechLC

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6697,9616,8157 August 2026 — 5,715 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,715 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,709 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,692 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,680 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,669 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,735 subscribers23 August 2026 — 5,717 subscribers26 August 2026 — 5,707 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,696 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,681 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,438 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,393 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,376 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,574 subscribers28 September 2026 — 6,544 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,477 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,419 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,208 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,961 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,879 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,832 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,791 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,755 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,719 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,690 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,649 subscribers7,6497 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net +1,934. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,325–8,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:167,649-41
5 Nov 2026, 11:267,690-29
2 Nov 2026, 21:557,719-36
30 Oct 2026, 20:307,755-36
27 Oct 2026, 11:217,791-41
24 Oct 2026, 17:257,832-47
21 Oct 2026, 20:477,879-82
18 Oct 2026, 22:177,961+753
15 Oct 2026, 16:077,208+789
12 Oct 2026, 13:466,419-58
5 Oct 2026, 23:186,477-67
28 Sept 2026, 15:596,544-30
18 Sept 2026, 16:196,574+198
14 Sept 2026, 10:026,376-17
10 Sept 2026, 21:396,393-45
5 Sept 2026, 14:206,438+757
1 Sept 2026, 12:445,681-15
29 Aug 2026, 13:265,696-11
26 Aug 2026, 20:545,707-10
23 Aug 2026, 16:335,717first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.56%
avg views ÷ 7,649 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held33 (25 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total3,910
Reactions total495
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 02:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,950
Videos
≈17
Links
≈275

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

934 reactions across 33 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥29231.3%
👍22724.3%
❤21723.2%
🙏454.82%
👌252.68%
✍202.14%
😍131.39%
🙈131.39%
👏121.28%
😱121.28%
🤝111.18%
❤‍🔥101.07%
👀101.07%
🎉80.857%
👨‍💻50.535%
🤗50.535%
💯40.428%
😁30.321%
🤯10.107%
🥰10.107%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 934 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 33 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ProRechLC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC101 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026

На этой неделе смотрела девочку. Возраст 2,8. Малышка произвела очень хорошее впечатление. Девочка усидчивая, контактная. Отвечает развернуто, не односложно. Сенсорные эталоны развиты отлично: уверенно показывает и называет основные цвета, геометрические формы (круг, квадрат, треугольник), легко ориентируется в величине (большой — маленький, длинный — короткий). Мелкая моторика в норме: уверенно держит карандаш, соби…

❤8👍6🔥5

11 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC131 views11 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Игры на словарь Чтобы игра приносила пользу, важно понимать, какой механизм тренирует каждая из них. «Что каким бывает?» Мяч — какой? «Круглый, красный, прыгучий». Лимон — «желтый, кислый, гладкий». Играйте по очереди: вы — предмет, ребенок — признак, потом наоборот. Что тренирует: расширение семантического поля, связь «предмет — признак». Это база для описательной речи. «Кто что делает?» «Кошка что делает?» — «Мя…

🔥5❤3👍3

10 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC141 views31 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Почему «повтори пять раз» не работает и что работает вместо этого? Запоминание слова — это не одно действие, а три этапа. Если убрать хоть один, слово не закрепится. Встреча. Ребенок слышит слово и связывает его с объектом. «Это красный». Пока это только узнавание — слово опознается при предъявлении, но еще не доступно для самостоятельного использования. Проживание. Слово встречается в разных ситуациях: красная ша…

🔥11❤10👍10

9 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC172 views28 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Елена, здравствуйте! Сыну 3,5. Понимает всё, говорит фразами. Но с цветами катастрофа: учим красный — через день путает, называет синим. Формы — та же история. Такое ощущение, что он просто не запоминает названия. Это память? Или что-то ещё? Уже не знаю, как подступиться. Здравствуйте! Когда вы говорите «он путает красный и синий», важно понять, что именно не работает. Потому что это могут быть две совершенно разные…

❤12🔥7👍6👏3

7 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC191 views24 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Задание на внимательность На картинке девушка и двое мужчин. Сможете их отыскать? Засекайте 15 секунд и приступайте. В комментариях делитесь, сколько времени ушло на поиски? #субботнее_задание

🔥10👀7👍7

6 Nov 2026, 06:45 UTC201 views29 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Игра «Почему так вышло?» (3+) Для чего предлагать? Для развития словаря действий и признаков, удержания правила, обучения ребенка отвечать на вопрос «почему?» и строить фразу «…потому что…». Именно здесь слово начинает работать на мышление: ребенок не просто называет картинку, а связывает два события причиной. Как предлагать? Распечатайте и разрежьте карточки. 1️⃣Разложите одну пару карточек вразнобой. Спросите: «Г…

👍12🔥10🙏7

5 Nov 2026, 06:42 UTC210 views36 reactionsread 13 November 2026

«Почему?» — вопрос, который ставит в тупик — Почему лужа высохла? — … — Ну подумай! Солнышко пригрело. Понял? — Понял. — Почему тогда высохла? — … Родители часто воспринимают это как «несообразительность». Но все проще и грустнее: ребенку может не хватать слов, чтобы оформить мысль. Мысль «лужа высохла, потому что солнце» у ребенка может быть. Но чтобы ее высказать, нужно построить фразу: «Потому что», «солнце», «…

❤12🔥10👍9🤗5

4 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC206 views41 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Игра не растет без речи Понаблюдайте за двумя детьми четырех лет. Первый катает машинку туда-сюда. Иногда бибикает. Через минуту бросает — берет другую игрушку. И так по кругу. Второй строит: «Это у нас больница. Ты — врач, я — скорая помощь. Я привез больного, у него болит живот. Срочно нужен укол!» Разница огромная. И дело не в том, что первый менее способный. Дело в том, что игра растет вместе с речью. Игра —…

❤20👍12🔥9

3 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC207 views35 reactionsread 13 November 2026

Почему инструкция не доходит? Вы говорите: «Сними ботинки, помой руки и садись за стол». Ребенок стоит и смотрит на вас. Вы повторяете — он начинает снимать один ботинок и… застревает. Вы повышаете голос. Он плачет. Родителям кажется, что ребенок вас не слышит или делает это специально. На самом деле — он не успевает. У детей с речевыми трудностями часто страдает рабочая память (своеобразный «блокнот» в голове, ку…

❤13🔥11🙏7👍4

2 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC221 views29 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

Почему «просто не говорит» — это не только про слова? Представьте: трехлетний Ваня хочет построить гараж для машинок. Он берет кубики, ставит их… и они падают. Он пробует снова — снова падают. Ваня злится, разбрасывает кубики и уходит. Что произошло? Вроде бы обычная детская досада. Но давайте заглянем глубже. Взрослый в такой ситуации говорит себе: «Так, надо поставить широкие кубики внизу, а узкие — сверху». То …

👍10🔥10❤9

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTC233 views19 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Poll

Как правильно?

  1. скрупулёзный59%
  2. скурпулёзный41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍6👨‍💻5👌4✍1🔥1🙈1🙏1

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTC231 views15 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Poll

Как правильно?

  1. сосиска97%
  2. сосиська3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥6👍3😁3✍1❤1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @ProRechLC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz71 voters

Как правильно?

  1. скрупулёзный59%
  2. скурпулёзный41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Как правильно?

  1. до сколькИ74%
  2. до скОльких13%
  3. до сколькИх13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz75 voters

Как правильно?

  1. по прилёте19%
  2. по прилёту81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz71 voters

Как правильно?

  1. победю0%
  2. побежу3%
  3. одержу победу97%
  4. побеждю0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz70 voters

Как правильно?

  1. сосиска97%
  2. сосиська3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz72 voters

Как правильно?

  1. в нутри0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новокриницкие от 1 до 3 лет
@novokrinitskii_otgoda · 32,951
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 September 2026
«Мама рулит»
@schastlivaiMaMaa · 12,123
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 October 2026
Ромашковые будни
@romashkarom · 18,740
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 October 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПроРечь” (@ProRechLC), 7,649 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ProRechLC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.