Channel
@PrismaX_News
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,009subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002310307656 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PrismaX_News |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PrismaX_News |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 3,009 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 3,008 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 3,011 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 3,013 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 3,012 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 3,014 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 3,013 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 3,013 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
270 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 54.1% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 18.1% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 9.26% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 4.44% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 4.07% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 3.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.85% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 1.85% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 1.48% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.741% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 270 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 23 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The First 100 is live. Verify Quality just opened to the public on PrismaX. Score the data robots learn from, earn points, and compete to become one of The First 100. Better data, better models. The standard starts with you. Start scoring 👉 app.prismax.ai
👍15😁3👏1
Here's your first look at Verify Quality. Tomorrow it opens to everyone. Score the data robots learn from, earn points, and compete to become one of The First 100. Live Tuesday, June 23, 9:00 AM PDT. The standard starts with you.
🥰2🔥1😁1
The standard starts with you. Tomorrow, Verify Quality opens to the public for the first time. Score the data robots learn from, earn points, and compete to become one of The First 100. Live Tuesday, June 23, 9:00 AM PDT.
❤6👍2😁1
New from PrismaX: the first edition of our monthly memo is live. Bayley on what actually changed in robotics this past year: hardware supply chains, video vs. teleop, the second wave of physical AI companies, and data becoming a real business. About a 10-minute read, broad field view. Read + subscribe 👉 prismaxai.substack.com/p/a-year-of-robotics-in-10-minutes
❤8👎2😁1
Robots & Rollups recap🍸🤖 This week we hosted during a16z #NYTechWeek. A packed room of robotics, AI, and crypto founders, researchers, investors, and builders. The teleop challenge ran all night. Our robot dog roamed the room. Sharp conversations on where physical AI is actually heading. The NY ecosystem showed up! Thank you to everyone who came. More events ahead. Subscribe to our Luma calendar to stay updated o…
🔥7❤5👍1😁1😍1
NY Tech Week is here and Robots & Rollups is TONIGHT! What's in the room: 🤖 Live teleoperation challenges 🤖 Robot dogs roaming the space (bring yours) 🤖 Custom cocktails & light bites 🤖 Founders, researchers, investors, and builders working across physical AI and frontier tech If you're in town, we'd love to see you later. RSVP ⤵️ https://partiful.com/e/GxfjRxDRUK8wgxH6UMG6?c=UekYpgv4
❤1👏1😁1
Doesn't Grasp is live! A new monthly podcast on what's actually happening in robotics and physical AI. Sponsored by PrismaX🦾 Hosted by Bayley Wang, cofounder and CEO of PrismaX, the show sits down with researchers and operators building the field from the inside. Technical, unscripted. The conversations you can't get from viral tweets. Episode 1: Painting Robots, Force, and the Industrial Graveyard with Dane Koutt…
❤8👏3🔥3😁2
🍸🤖 NYC — we’re hosting a happy hour during a16z #NYTechWeek! Introducing: Robots & Rollups Hosted by PrismaX, this is a curated evening bringing together founders, researchers, engineers, investors, and frontier builders exploring the future of physical AI. We’re especially excited for this one as an a16z-backed company participating in NY Tech Week alongside so many incredible teams across the ecosystem. This is…
❤9👏5🏆2
The PrismaX Regional Ambassador Program is LIVE 🦾 Today, PrismaX is opening applications for our Regional Ambassador Program. A select cohort of regional leaders will help grow local PrismaX communities in their language, region, and time zone. The PrismaX community now spans 1.4M+ members globally, with 50,000+ in Discord. Conversations are already happening in dozens of languages, across regions we don't post in …
❤18❤🔥5🔥4
It's HACKATHON season 🦾 We’re sponsoring BETA Hackathon 2026! This is an 8-hour, builder-first sprint bringing together 200+ developers, researchers, and entrepreneurs from across the Bay Area. Teams will build and ship across four tracks: ▪️ AI-native applications and agentic workflows ▪️ Voice and vision systems ▪️ Robotics and embodied AI ▪️ Crypto and agent-based coordination The event will also feature keynot…
❤15🔥5
It’s time to build! We’re excited to support RoboHacks at Y Combinator this weekend. 36 hours. 25 robots. 120 hackers. $15K+ in prizes. We’re proud to be in the room alongside teams from Google DeepMind, NASA, Scale AI, ElevenLabs, and others pushing the boundaries of physical AI. Looking forward to seeing what gets built! RSVP 👉 https://luma.com/robohacks-at-YC
🔥12👍4👌3
Q1 Product Updates We shipped a number of product updates across PrismaX in Q1 2026, focused on improving reliability, clarity, and day-to-day operation. This includes: 🦾 Infrastructure upgrades across multi-chain support, performance, and security 🦾 Improvements to the teleoperation experience, including queue visibility and session reliability 🦾 A restructured Robot Control Center with new arms and clearer access…
❤17👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PrismaX_News. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 658,434 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PrismaX News” (@PrismaX_News), 3,009 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrismaX_News.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.