Channel
@PrimePhilosophy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
38subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001578063778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PrimePhilosophy |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 16 April 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PrimePhilosophy |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2026, 03:41 | 38 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 40 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 41 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 41 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 16 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2022 to 10 July 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Here is an introduction + exercise document for homeschool parents, educators and children wishing to participate in the New Standard Dictionary project. It's still early days with expected evolution and revision through feedback from the community, so your thoughts will be appreciated.. 🙏🙏💜💜😁😁 www.NewStandardDictionary.com
Signed Fahad
Our use of language, the way we think, and how we interpret the world are all interconnected things that inform and influence one another. Being mindful of this maintains awareness of the difference between reality and imagination, otherwise a person is prone to becoming delusional. This aspect of a persons mental health influences the logic in their communication. It can be seen especially when the meaning of a sen…
Signed Fahad
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Fahad
Livestream interview with Dave Guru about the New Standard Dictionary project for the freedom community 👍👍 Dave Guru organised the freedom camps at Canberra and gave daily speeches there. He's also close with Riccardo Bosi. https://t.me/thegreatsouthernland/21461
Signed Fahad
Inspired by an episode of Seinfeld
Signed Fahad
Something interesting I learnt today about the stroboscopic markings on a record player. I know what this is, but can anyone describe what I'm observing here?
Signed Fahad
I'd love it if Malala made parantha like my Mamma! 💜💜💜
Signed Fahad
@PRIMEPHILOSOPHY
Signed Fahad
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Fahad
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed Fahad
Some interesting info on what voters really think and where your votes actually go. P.s. As far as I know, an informal vote still goes to a party. Share around these flyers if you agree that the voting in Australia is not free and fair.
Signed Fahad
Saw this movie last night and thought I'd correct the title to suit it better. Holy hell I don't think I've seen another movie that's so against traditional values and culture. The villain is literally a single white woman who dreams of having children and the diverse "superheroes" have to stop her. Special effects 👍 Plot, casting and dialogue 👎👎👎👎 I was honestly on the villains side through most of the movie.
Signed Fahad
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PrimePhilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Prime Philosophy” (@PrimePhilosophy), 38 subscribers as measured 3 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrimePhilosophy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.