Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Агентство "Премьер"

@PremierAgency24

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,004subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001176207316
TypeChannel
Username@PremierAgency24
Descriptionhttps://telega.in/c/PremierAgency24 По вопросам размещения рекламы пишите в whats'app: +7-909-162-71-24 Канал создан для актёров и моделей, желающих сниматься в рекламе и кино, с целью информирования о проходящих кастингах. a6gl7lhiwtp35ahe
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PremierAgency24

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@deticastingru/37412 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC@PremierAgency24/3907 · this entry12 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@deticastingru/37816 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC@PremierAgency24/3913 · this entry16 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@PremierAgency24/3926 · this entry25 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC@deticastingru/38425 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@PremierAgency24/3933 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC@deticastingru/3891 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@PremierAgency24/3945 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC@deticastingru/3924 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC1.00under a minute
@PremierAgency24/3955 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC@deticastingru/3945 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@deticastingru9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (72)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @deticastingru. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

8,0048,0118,007.57 August 2026 — 8,011 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,011 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,004 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,003–8,012 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 04:288,004-7
7 Aug 2026, 12:328,011no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:238,011first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 8,004 subscribers
Avg views / post
884
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held26 (12 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total21,204
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
513
Videos
11
Links
639

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Advertising

Ad load
11.5%
3 of 26 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
808
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
828
over 23 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGf6LbT17 August 20267 August 2026
2W5zFHnKTWh15 August 20265 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC523 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎨 КАСТИНГ ДЕТЕЙ В НОВУЮ ДЕТСКУЮ ПРОГРАММУ Ищем мальчиков и девочек 5–10 лет, которым нравится рисовать и которые уверенно чувствуют себя перед камерой. 📹 Предварительный отбор — по видеовизитке 📅 Съёмки программы планируются на сентябрь 💰 Участие оплачивается ❗️Для детей, прошедших предварительный отбор, родителям необходимо будет подписать согласие на использование записи проб. 👉 ПОДАТЬ ЗАЯВКУ: https://1casting.ru/c

11 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC553 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💬 ВОТ ПОЧЕМУ НОВИЧКОВ БЕРУТ ЧАЩЕ, ЧЕМ ОПЫТНЫХ Осень — сезон, когда проектов в разы больше, а лиц всё ещё не хватает. Заходить в индустрию проще именно сейчас, пока конкуренция не выросла. С приглашённым экспертом разберём: 🔋 Как собрать рабочее портфолио без студийной съёмки за 40 000 ₽ 🔋 Как справиться с зажимом перед камерой за несколько минут до кастинга 🔋 В чём разница между модельным и актёрским кастингом — и

9 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC738 viewsread 12 August 2026

🎥 Кастинг в рекламный ролик для бренда умных устройств 🗓 15.08-20.08 (смена в период, точная дата уточняется) 💰 40 000/ смена ЖЕНЩИНЫ 25-33 ГОДА Девушка. Рассматривают разные типажи. ЖЕНЩИНЫ 25-27 ЛЕТ Девушка. Рассматривают разные типажи. МУЖЧИНЫ 27-33 ГОДА Парень. Рассматривают разные типажи. Москва. Права: - 1 год, Интернет (посевы в Телеграм + OLV) 📩 casting.nem@yandex.ru — с пометкой «умные устройства» + ро

7 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC808 viewsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFGf6LbT

Что упускают 70% родителей и почему способные дети не становятся актёрами? Многие думают, что «в кино берут по знакомству». Но наши подписчики — доказательство обратного. В 2025 году наши актеры заработали сотни тысяч рублей гонораров на съёмках Среди проектов: «Таня и Космонавт», «Мой Дикий Друг», «Мама будет против», реклама Аэрофлот, Сбербанк, ЖК «Лес» и другие. Хотите также? Приходите на курс «Я в кино», где дет

7 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC788 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Давай честно про массовки 🙃 Это не плохо. Это не хорошо. Это просто подработка. Но если ты хочешь карьеру - массовка тебе не поможет. Она не учит играть. Не даёт контактов. Не строит портфолио. Она учит стоять. Ждать. Молчать. ❇️ Как зайти в индустрию? — Николай Лысенков (режиссёр, ВГИК, 100+ кастингов) показывает по шагам на бесплатном эфире. — как собрать портфолио, которое работает — что такое типаж и как его

6 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC801 viewsread 12 August 2026

🦷 НОВЫЙ КАСТИНГ — РЕКЛАМА СРЕДСТВ ДЛЯ ГИГИЕНЫ ПОЛОСТИ РТА Ищем девушек 25–32 лет на две роли: ✨ Главная героиня — длинные русые или светлые волосы, харизма, самоирония и яркая индивидуальность. ✨ Подруга — темноволосая, харизматичная и кокетливая. Обязательные требования: — красивые ровные зубы; — опыт съёмок в рекламе, кино или видеопроектах. 💰 Гонорар: 120 000 ₽ − 20% 📅 Коллбэк: 11 августа 📅 Примерка: 14 августа 🎬

5 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC744 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🥛 КАСТИНГ В РЕКЛАМУ ЙОГУРТА Ищем мальчика 4–6 лет. 💰 Гонорар: 100 000 ₽ − 20% Смена — 8 часов, далее возможны переработки. 📅 Важные даты: • 7 августа — колбэк в Санкт-Петербурге; • 10 и 13 августа — колбэки в Москве; • 16 августа — примерка; • 18 и 19 августа — съёмочные смены. 📺 Права: • 3 ролика; • основная версия каждого ролика — 20 секунд; • дополнительные версии — 10 и 6 секунд; • горизонтальный, вертикальный и

5 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC605 viewsread 12 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFHnKTWhPhoto

🎬 ОТПРАВИМ ВАШЕГО РЕБЁНКА НА СЪЁМКИ В КИНО УЖЕ ЭТОЙ ОСЕНЬЮ — БЕЗ БЛАТА И СВЯЗЕЙ «В кино без связей не берут» — это миф. Мы — детский продюсерский центр «Мир Звёзд». Уже более 500 наших учеников прошли обучение и получили возможность работать на настоящих съёмочных площадках. ⭐ В 2025 году наши дети снимались в проектах: • «Мой дикий друг»; • «Мама будет против»; • проектах для «Аэрофлота» и Сбербанка; • сериалах, кин

5 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC555 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tabascobandPhoto

Друзья, момент настал! Официальная дата релиза новой песни Tabasco Band - Лето Пой 18 августа. Ну, а пока чтобы не пропустить релиз делайте пресейв трека, на удобных вам площадках: band.link/letopoy

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @PremierAgency24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,083,146 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Агентство "Премьер"” (@PremierAgency24), 8,004 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PremierAgency24.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.