Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prelims War Room

Channel

Prelims War Room

@PrelimsWarRoom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

345subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 7 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003751273735
TypeChannel
Username@PrelimsWarRoom
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 November 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/PrelimsWarRoom

Growth

336345340.57 Nov 2026, 23:22 — 336 subscribers8 Nov 2026, 08:47 — 345 subscribers7 Nov 2026, 23:228 Nov 2026, 08:47
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 335–346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 08:47345+9
7 Nov 2026, 23:22336first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
116.0%
avg views ÷ 345 subscribers
Avg views / post
400
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held15 (17 October 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total6,003
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 19:16 UTC37 viewsread 7 November 2026

Walking alone on the roof, ruminating about life through Kishore Kumar songs

7 Nov 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 7 November 2026

Celebrate with your loved ones, and remember to spread some joy beyond your immediate circle too. Share sweets with those who keep our streets clean, guard our homes, sleep under the open sky, the elderly who live alone, and anyone spending Diwali away from their families. Happy Diwali! 🪔❤️

6 Nov 2026, 06:08 UTC234 viewsread 7 November 2026

Full speculation-maxxer masquerading as a deep analyst. Someone please go and tell him that correlation ≠ causation For optional he's claiming "candidates make scaling work in their favour" ??? Matlab candidates have figured out how to manipulate statistical scaling through originality/depth of content? Matlab kuch bhi?! No 280+ optional scorer can reliably predict their scores. Not even in science based optionals…

5 Nov 2026, 21:04 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 November 2026

Those who couldn't clear CSE Mains, it's going to be tough. The hardest part, perhaps, would be informing parents. They'll encourage you, but you know how much it hurts them. And beyond all the comforting words people will offer, it's a fact this is a deeply personal moment of grief. Will take a few days. Embrace that. Give yourself the time & space to come to terms with it. Also, please don't rush any decisions. Th…

3 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTC401 viewsread 7 November 2026
Photo

By the end of..../in the long run... – "is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task, if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us, that when the storm is log past, the ocean is flat again" – John Keynes

26 Oct 2026, 07:29 UTC336 viewsread 7 November 2026

An interesting sociological perspective here is how women will either turn into a conformist (wearing lipstick to look conventionally feminine), a rebel (wearing despite being conditioned not to, to assert autonomy/independence), or a consumer (wearing becoz their favourite celebrity promoted a brand on insta). The market, however, will profit from all these 3 women. Turning feminism into a commodity to exploit Rem…

26 Oct 2026, 05:16 UTC300 viewsread 7 November 2026

Commodification of coffee has reached a point where people need 25 additives to tolerate its fundamental taste Why does every beverage need to be converted into a dessert? Let coffee taste like coffee

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @PrelimsWarRoom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prelims War Room” (@PrelimsWarRoom), 345 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PrelimsWarRoom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.