Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for پراکسیس

Channel

پراکسیس

@PraxisMH

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,133subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 19 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001546498588
TypeChannel
Username@PraxisMH
Descriptionمباحثی در زمینه «زیبایی شناسی رادیکال» و «فلسفه عملگرایی» و هر کنش یا فعالیتی که به این موضوعات مربوط بشه/ @Majid_heidarii
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/PraxisMH

Growth

1,13319 Sept 2026, 12:47 — 1,133 subscribers19 Sept 2026, 13:22 — 1,133 subscribers19 Sept 2026, 12:4719 Sept 2026, 13:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,132–1,134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:221,133no change
19 Sept 2026, 12:471,133first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.4%
avg views ÷ 1,133 subscribers
Avg views / post
300
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held12 (30 August 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total3,595
Reactions total146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
793
Videos
25
Links
526

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

146 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8658.9%
😁2215.1%
👏138.90%
🤗64.11%
🔥53.42%
😱42.74%
👍32.05%
☃21.37%
🆒10.685%
🌚10.685%
👀10.685%
👌10.685%
🙏10.685%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 05:16 UTC211 views26 reactionsread 19 September 2026

دو ساعت با تونی سوپرانو برق که رفت، من توی آسانسور بودم. آسانسور یک تکان کوچک خورد و ایستاد. از آن تکان‌هایی که اول آدم امیدوار می‌شود بخشی از برنامه‌ی عادی دستگاه باشد، ولی بعد از پنج ثانیه سکوت می‌فهمد نه؛ تقدیر شخصاً وارد ماجرا شده. گوشی را درآوردم. آنتن: هیچ. اینترنت: هیچ. آسانسور: هیچ. از بیرون گفتند احتمالاً دو ساعت طول می‌کشد. اینجا بود که فهمیدم تمام این مدت فلسفه‌ی رواقی را اشتباه خوانده‌ام. من فکر می‌کرد…

❤10👏6😱4🔥3😁2🆒1

17 Sept 2026, 05:09 UTC255 views39 reactionsread 19 September 2026

خربزه رواقی امروز یه خربزه خریدم. فروشنده خربزه رو برداشت، یه نگاه کارشناسانه بهش کرد و گفت: «شیرینِ شیرینه، عین عسل. ببر؛ شیرین نبود، برگرد هرچی دلت خواست بهم بگو.» این جمله‌ی آخر رو با چنان آرامشی گفت که احساس کردم ضمانت خربزه مستقیماً از طرف طبیعت صادر شده. آوردمش خونه، بریدم و اولین قاچ رو خوردم. هیچی. نه شیرین بود، نه ترش؛ انگار آب برای مدتی کوتاه تصمیم گرفته بود شکل خربزه به خودش بگیرد. اولین فکرم این بود که…

😁18❤14🤗6🌚1

17 Sept 2026, 05:07 UTC233 views5 reactionsread 19 September 2026

حکیم ناچار حکیم ناچار «لقب ادبی» دوستی است که تأملاتش درباره ایده‌ها و اصطلاحات رواقی را می‌نویسد. برای حکیم ناچار «نوشتن» بخشی از تلاش‌های مکرر، طنزآلود و اندکی تلخ برای زیستن است. @PraxisMH

❤5

16 Sept 2026, 08:39 UTC227 views9 reactionsread 19 September 2026

چهار راه بی‌چراغ بیش از نیمی از اعضای بدنم با اراده من کار نمی‌کنند. به زبان علمی، بدنم تشکیل شده ‌از یک «سیستم عصبی پیکری» که مسئول اعمال ارادی است و یک «سیستم عصبی خودمختار» که مسئول عملکرد اعضای خودفرمان است همچون قلب و گوارش، تعریق، کبد و کلیه و غیره. یافته‌های من از بدنم با حقایق علمی در تناقض است یعنی به تجربه یافته‌ام که «سیستم عصبی پیکری» کاملا در کنترل من نیست. به عنوان مثال، کنترل کمی بر چشم‌هایم دار…

❤6😁2👀1

14 Sept 2026, 08:00 UTC317 views26 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

گزارش جلسه آخر دوره فلسفه رواقی ۱۹ شهریور ۱۴۰۵ فلسفه رواقی سفر است، سفر به برکه ساکت. در آخرین جلسه این دوره پنج هفته‌ای، چند ساعتی پیاده‌روی کردیم و کنار برکه وقت گذراندیم. ایده مرکزی جلسات دوره این بود که فلسفه رواقی سفر است. سفری که در مسیر آن هر فرد به صورت مستقل به خودآئینی دست می‌زند و اشیاء، مکان‌ها و کنش‌ها را بازتعریف می‌کند. این مسیر نه بر اساس دانستگی، تعصب یا تقدس که برپایه ندانستن و شوق به کشف ش…

❤23☃2👌1

7 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC409 views11 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

«عمل خلاقه: روشی برای بودن» برگرفته از کتاب: ☑️هنرمند بودن به چیزی که تولید می‌کنی مربوط نیست، بلکه به رابطه‌ی تو با جهان مربوط است. ☑️بزرگ‌ترین مانع خلاقیت معمولاً تکنیک یا کمبود استعداد نیست، بلکه ذهن خود ماست: ترس از قضاوت دیگران، تلاش برای کامل بودن، تقلید از موفقیت دیگران ☑️اثر هنری از انباشت تجربه‌های واقعی شکل می‌گیرد. چیزی که هنرمند دیده، لمس کرده و احساس کرده، بعدها وارد اثر می‌شود. نگاه نویسنده به مفهو…

❤9🔥2

1 Sept 2026, 08:18 UTC503 views14 reactionsread 19 September 2026

نمایش و زندگی در جهان معاصر متن زیر پیشینه مختصری است از رابطه بین «نمایش» و «زندگی» که به تازگی استخراج کردم. این متن شامل اصطلاحات جالب توجهی است که می‌تواند به شناخت ما از زندگی امروز کمک کند. رابطه میان زندگی و نمایش یکی از موضوعات مهم در اندیشه اجتماعی و فلسفی قرن بیستم و بیست‌ویکم است. اگر در گذشته نمایش بیشتر به حوزه هنر، تئاتر و آیین‌ها محدود می‌شد، در جهان مدرن و به‌ویژه در زندگی معاصر، منطق نمایش به بخش …

❤7👏4👍3

30 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC365 views12 reactionsread 19 September 2026

چربی، نمد و مجسمه اجتماعی در سال ۱۹۴۴، زمانی که بویس به‌عنوان نیروی هوایی ارتش آلمان در جنگ حضور داشت، هواپیمای او در منطقه‌ی کریمه سقوط کرد و بعد از مدتی سربازان آلمانی او را نجات دادند. اما بعدها روایت این سقوط را تغییر داد و به دروغ گفت: گروهی از تاتارهای محلی او را یافته‌اند و بدن زخمی‌اش را با چربی حیوانی پوشانده و او را در نمد پیچیده‌اند تا گرمای بدنش حفظ شود. با این دروغ (اسطوره) او سابقه هنری خود را آغاز…

❤8👏3🙏1

30 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC309 views4 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

یوزف بویس (۱۹۸۶-۱۹۲۱)

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @PraxisMH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Honaragah(ادبیات،هنر،سینما)
@honaragah · 23,167
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
زبان انگلیسی با ارشنیا نیا
@RezaArashniaOfficial · 20,120
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پراکسیس” (@PraxisMH), 1,133 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PraxisMH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.