Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Терри Пратчетт и Ироничные фантасты

Channel

Терри Пратчетт и Ироничные фантасты

@Pratchett_fun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,479subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001604877301
TypeChannel
Username@Pratchett_fun
Created17 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pratchett_fun

Growth

6,4796,4856,4827 August 2026 — 6,485 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,485 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,484 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,479 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,478–6,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:586,479-5
7 Aug 2026, 11:306,484-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:306,485no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:296,485first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 6,479 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held28 (27 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total39,770
Reactions total2,685
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,685 reactions across 28 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,41352.6%
44816.7%
👍28910.8%
🔥2288.49%
❤‍🔥973.61%
🤣772.87%
💯702.61%
👏441.64%
😢130.484%
🥰60.223%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,685reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 28 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Pratchett_fun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC120 views10 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

… когда высокая фигура в черном плаще и с последней новинкой из области сельскохозяйственных инструментов начинает бросать на вас задумчивые взгляды, тут нужно действовать быстро. 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Безумная звезда

❤‍🔥73

11 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC651 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- Он меня правда защитит? - спросил Лобсанг, надевая пробковый шлем. - Вряд ли. Но когда найдут твою голову, тебя хотя бы можно будет опознать. 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Вор времени

😁36❤‍🔥8👍72🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC851 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- Кому-то надо ехать. Наш флаг должен реять над морями. - Это еще почему? - Матушка, вы меня удивляете. Это наш флаг. Он должен реять. 🖋️ Терри Пратчетт Народ, или когда-то мы были дельфинами

👍33❤‍🔥19🔥14😁6💯32

10 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC906 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Лучшей политикой было просто улыбаться и ждать. С изобретателями всегда так: они обожают объяснять. Надо просто подождать, пока они опустятся с высот до твоего уровня понимания предмета, даже если им придется для этого лечь плашмя. 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Опочтарение

💯31😁1912🥰4❤‍🔥2👍2🔥2

10 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC909 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А еще был концерт народной тецуманской музыки, которая звучала примерно так, как если бы кто-то решил наконец прочистить месяцами заложенную ноздрю. 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Эрик

😁4810❤‍🔥5👍1🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,000 views102 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Единственным искусством, которым в совершенстве овладели алхимики Анк-Морпорка, было умение превращать золото в меньшее количество золота 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Движущиеся картинки

😁8111❤‍🔥4👍2👏2🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC≈1,120 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Впрочем, личный врач монарха в своем заключении указал, что кончина его пациента явилась естественным исходом заболевания. Перед подписанием заключения лекарь некоторое время совещался наедине с Бенценом, и тому удалось разъяснить медику, что недуг, приводящий к скатыванию по лестнице с кинжалом в спине, является следствием чересчур длинного языка. 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Вещие сестрички

😁58👍16🔥105💯2❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTC≈1,240 views101 reactionsread 12 August 2026

- Господин фон Липвиг, ты только что лежал под поездом, и пятьдесят тонн железа проехали у тебя над головой, а теперь ты вертишься как юла, весь такой энергичный, бойкий, с планами! Что ты такое принимаешь? И можно мне тоже? 🖋️Терри Пратчетт Поддай пару!

46😁37👏14👍2❤‍🔥1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC≈1,450 views105 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

В общем, ничего удивительного, что драконы вечно болели. По сути, непрекращающееся желудочное расстройство было необходимым элементом выработки топлива. Большая часть мозга дракона занималась контролированием сложного пищеварительного процесса, способного вырабатывать воспламеняющуюся смесь из самых немыслимых ингредиентов. Дело доходило до того, что, если попадался какой-нибудь «трудноперегоняемый» кусочек, дракон з

🔥5820👍14😁12❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,340 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дуббинс вёл себя слишком уж вежливо. А если гном ведёт себя вежливо, значит, он копит силы, чтобы потом вести себя очень скверно. 🖋️Терри Пратчетт К оружию! К оружию!

41😁40🔥17❤‍🔥3👍2

6 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC≈1,500 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Парадная дверь распахнулась, и через порог, скособочась, перелез некий предмет странной формы. Передвигался он довольно странно – несколько шагов вперед, два шага назад – и, кроме того, разговаривал сам с собой. Детрит опустил взгляд. Он увидел... по меньшей мере семь ног самых разных размеров, и только четыре из них были со ступнями. Он неуклюже подошел к ящику и постучал по боковой стенке. – Эй, эй! Это что такое?

47😁33👍23❤‍🔥2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Pratchett_fun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,090,944 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Терри Пратчетт и Ироничные фантасты” (@Pratchett_fun), 6,479 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pratchett_fun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.