Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

چاوشین

@Pourya1v

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

240subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796691018
TypeChannel
Username@Pourya1v
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Pourya1v

Growth

240241240.57 August 2026 — 241 subscribers7 August 2026 — 241 subscribers13 August 2026 — 240 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 240–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:26240-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:32241no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:47241first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

279 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9835.1%
🤣8831.5%
❤‍🔥279.68%
👍196.81%
😁176.09%
😢165.73%
👌62.15%
😭41.43%
😱20.717%
👏10.358%
🔥10.358%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2025 to 8 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Nov 2025, 19:42 UTC546 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

آسمون تیشه ت شکسته، من دیگه رو پام میمونم... شنبه ۱۴۰۴/۸/۱۷

23

Signed Pourya

20 Aug 2025, 20:29 UTC923 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

( گویا اینجا از نظر طراح فیلم، بَبَعی شدن نشونه بهتر شدن و برگشتن به ورژن سابقه و دوباره حالم خوب میشه😂)

😁173😭1

Signed Pourya

20 Aug 2025, 20:25 UTC793 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نمی‌تونم بگم 22 سالگیم مبارک... تولد 22 سالگی مبارک نبود، اما خب بلاخره یه سال دیگه هم گذشت..(: سال عجیب و خیلی سخت و تلخی بود... امیدوارم تولد سال بعد عمیقاً حالم خوب باشه و روزای بهتری رو بگذرونم... پس به امید روزای بهتر... ۱۴۰۴/۵/۲۹

32🔥1

Signed Pourya

20 Aug 2025, 20:25 UTC922 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

اینم خیلی باحال بود ، زحمت کشیدن برام درست کردن، گفتم اینجا هم بفرستم..❤️😂😂 به یاد سبک فیلمای قدیمی چنل.. بچه های قدیمی می‌دونن..😂

🤣23😭1

Signed Pourya

4 Aug 2025, 11:09 UTC757 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BChatBot

‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ ایشالله که مربوط به شروع دوباره‌ت باشه🙂💚

👍9👏1

Signed Pourya

4 Aug 2025, 10:50 UTC721 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

حالا شاید کنجکاو شید و بگید داخلش چیه. ک در این صورت متأسفانه جواب نمیدم..🤦‍♂😂 حالا در آینده میگم...

👌6😭2

Signed Pourya

4 Aug 2025, 10:47 UTC619 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

خب اینم همین الان رسید... ۱۴۰۴/۵/۱۳

5👍3😢1

Signed Pourya

27 Jul 2025, 15:10 UTC646 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نوشته بود، هزارتا رویا کشته میشه تا بفهمی زندگی رویایی نیست؛ اما هزار و یکمین رویا زنده میمونه تا پی ببری زندگی بدون رویا معنایی نداره... ۱۴۰۴/۵/۵

❤‍🔥27

Signed Pourya

26 Jul 2025, 21:00 UTC603 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

لینک بات پاک شد، پیامای ناشناسِ چنل رو پاک میکنم، خیلی شلوغ شد... خاطرات باحالی مرور شد و خندیدیم... و راستش باهاتون ک حرف زدم فک کنم یکم حال و هوام عوض شد ، خلاصه مرسی ک هستید.. جدی دلم برای همه تون تنگ میشه..❤️ فعلاً ناچارم ک برم... برام دعا کنید... سعی میکنم زودتر خوب و بلند شم.. یعنی باید بلند شم... فعلاً خدافظ رفقا..🌹

33

Signed Pourya

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Pourya1v. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 432,113 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چاوشین” (@Pourya1v), 240 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pourya1v.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.