Channel
@PositionAnn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18,516subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001436673133 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PositionAnn |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PositionAnn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 18,516 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 18,526 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 18,533 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 18,544 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 18,555 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 18,557 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 18,565 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:38 | 18,565 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Dear Posi Holders, 🚀 Rally for Posi Group is Ready! 🚀 Real POSI holders, your exclusive access awaits! Verify your holdings through our specialized verification bot to receive a private invite link to join the group. Requirements: - Minimum POSI holding: 1 POSI on BSC and/or Posichain - Continuous verification: The bot checks both BSC and Posichain. If you sell all your POSI, you will be automatically removed from…
Dear users, Here we have great news regarding POSIChain Bridge. 🥳 After a complicated hardwork of recollecting the available data, our developers could resume the bridge functionality. The users whose Posi was stuck on Posichain, can now bridge them to BNBChain. Some points to consider: 👇 1. The bridge is active now just from Posichain to BNBCHAIN. It will be active permanently. ( the reciprocal bridge will be ava…
An important message from the CEO : Dear Community, I understand how everyone is feeling right now. Firstly, I apologize for not being able to focus fully on the development of our project recently due to various reasons. Additionally, I acknowledge and apologize for my past mistakes, especially for not fully foreseeing the risks involved with our project's features. I realize that many of you have invested dreams…
Dear holders: The first batch of repayment was successfully done for Gain Grid and Futures Staking stuck funds. We cannot promise any fixed timetable or percentage but will try our best to continue this process in the future more regularly. If you have not registered with our verification bots yet, do not get worried. The process will be ongoing until everyone gets listedon our repayment backlog. In addition to th…
Hello everyone. 👋 To go on with the announced plan, the Futures Staking refund verification bot is now ready. If you have funds stuck in Futures liquidity pools, please follow these steps: 1. Just chat to: @PECredVerifyBot with the command /fs 2. Enter wallet address Verify it 3. Then a invitation link will be created, use it to join the group. The bot command for bonds support will be created later
Important: End of Service Announcement for Gain Grid Dear Gain Grid Users, Today, we must share a significant and challenging update. After detailed market analysis and considering the extreme volatility we've faced, we are saddened to announce that Gain Grid will be discontinued effective April 29, 2024. This decision weighs heavily on us, and we are keenly aware of its impact on you, our valued users. Why is Gai…
What are your thoughts on Decentralized Exchange integrating AI technology into its platform? Share your opinions and ideas with us!
Traders or Holders? Who wins more in a bull market! 🤔 What do you think? Share your thoughts with us here 🤗
Unlike traditional exchanges, Position Exchange's on-chain orderbooks offer unmatched transparency and security. With direct peer-to-peer trading, you have full control over your transactions, eliminating the need for intermediaries. 🚀🌐
🛡 Stay Vigilant, PosiNation! 🚨 In times of market upturns, hackers are on the prowl. Protect your assets by staying alert to phishing attempts, suspicious links, and unauthorized access. Remember, safety first in every trade and transaction.🔒
Market is Bullish🐂. Will it hit a new ATH soon or you are thinking of a different scenario? Share your prediction with us.🥰
"Even in stillness, our potential knows no bounds!" 🔓💫 While our current condition may have slowed our pace, it hasn't dampened our spirits. With every challenge comes an opportunity to rise stronger and more resilient than ever before. Let's use this time to reflect, re-calibrate, and reaffirm our commitment to success with Position Exchange!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PositionAnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 714,339 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PositionAnn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Position.Exchange Announcement” (@PositionAnn), 18,516 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PositionAnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.