це вы шо? ладно уж, тут я: @Kairessport, не ревите

Channel
продается?/закрытие
@PortCarmen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
47subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003414330214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PortCarmen |
| Description | ִֶָ☾.Т᧐ᴛ, κᴛ᧐ ʙ ϶ᴛ᧐ᥔ жᥙᤋнᥙ ᧐δᥙдᥱ᧘ ᧐ᥴ᧘ᥲ, ʙ ᥴ᧘ᥱдующᥱᥔ ᥴᥲⲙ ᥴᴛᥲнᥱᴛ ᧐ᥴ᧘᧐ⲙ⋆˙⟡ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 6 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PortCarmen |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 47 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 47 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 45
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
60 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5452150155488814433 | 22 | 36.7% | |
| custom 5451662371758040963 | 13 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5470109969258943528 | 10 | 16.7% | |
| custom 5204320015544777043 | 8 | 13.3% | |
| custom 5204268149519717015 | 3 | 5.00% | |
| custom 5202009043966656353 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| custom 5202159681354630227 | 2 | 3.33% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
я заебалась этот канал вести, мб другой создам, у кармен нет будущего, я не любила этот проект🖤
custom 54521501554888144335custom 52042681495197170151custom 54516623717580409631
💜—КАРМЕН НЕТ...МОЯ ЛЮБОВЬ, КУДА ТЫ?😭😭
Signed |кьювикс я —ISFP|#🦭 / #женаХади / #HED
Sticker, posted without a caption
и так, к большому сожалению сил вести этот канал нет, от слова совсем… думаю сейчас я закроюсь, может продам если кто захочет @Creatures_I спасибо всем, шоу окончено, еще увидимся! разрыв союзов!
custom 54521501554888144333
Channel name was changed to «продается?/закрытие»
Sticker, posted without a caption
[🌸🌸] - по неким обстоятельствам, а точнее подозрениям о сотрясении я легла в больницу, поэтому беру дооолгий рест, до какого не знаю #важно
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ℰ𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑖○𝑛 «♱𝆬» . . . ℜ𝖎ɳ𝖎
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ℰ𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑖○𝑛 «♱𝆬» . . . ℜ𝖎ɳ𝖎
🎀🎀🎀 #𝐬𝐭Ï𝐜𝐤𝔢𝐫𝐬 || #𝐩𝐫ᥲ𝐜𝐭Ï𝐜𝔢 🎀🎀🎀💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 ✨✨✨🤩 ¡! 🔤𝒆⃪፝֟𝒘⃪꯭ ۬۫͜𝒔⃪𝒕⃪Ï⃪𝒄⃪𝒌⃪𝒆⃪𝒓⃪𝒔⃪𞥊 . . .✨ . ︎◌⃘ ֺ۪ ۟ ⎯ ◟ 𝂅ׄ ִ ִ ◝ . . (🖤) . . 𝇁𝇃𝇂 ... 𝅄 𝂅𝅥 𝄀۫ ︎ ︎ 💙🎀🎀— 🪦🪦 . . ᥲ𝐝𝐦Ï𝐧 :: ℜ𝖎ɳ𝖎💙 . . . 🔤𝐡ᥲ𝐫ᥲ𝐜𝐭𝔢𝐫 :: N𝔢𝐮𝐯Ï𝐥𝐥𝔢𝐭𝐭𝔢 // G𝔢𝐧𝐬𝐡Ï𝐧 💙 ✨ |[🖤🖤]| — 𝐨𝐰𝐧𝔢𝐫 :: 𝐡𝔢 ✨ 💙 🎀🎀🎀💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 ✨🎀ᧉ 𝒑⃪𝒓⃪𝚰⃪𝒄⃪𝒆⃪֕ 𞥊۬۫͜𝒍⃪𝚰⃪𝒔⃪𝒕⃪✨✨ . . ''𝒐⃪𝒓⃪𝒅⃪𝒆⃪𝒓⃪𝒔⃪ۭ֕ۙ𓂂𐇽✨✨ ✨✨✨✨✨✨ 𞥊۬۫͜𝒃⃪፝֟𝒐⃪𝒕⃪✨✨✨✨
custom 54516623717580409635custom 52021596813546302272custom 52042681495197170151custom 52043200155447770431
Signed ℰ𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑖○𝑛 «♱𝆬» . . . ℜ𝖎ɳ𝖎
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ℰ𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑖○𝑛 «♱𝆬» . . . ℜ𝖎ɳ𝖎
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PortCarmen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,352,314 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PortCarmen named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“продается?/закрытие” (@PortCarmen), 47 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PortCarmen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.