Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 44 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,539–12,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:54
12,550
+1
17 Sept 2026, 04:38
12,549
-1
15 Sept 2026, 07:01
12,550
-7
13 Sept 2026, 17:55
12,557
-4
11 Sept 2026, 23:59
12,561
-4
9 Sept 2026, 16:57
12,565
-14
4 Sept 2026, 01:57
12,579
-4
2 Sept 2026, 15:38
12,583
-1
1 Sept 2026, 17:12
12,584
-7
31 Aug 2026, 17:46
12,591
-2
30 Aug 2026, 14:37
12,593
+1
29 Aug 2026, 15:56
12,592
-7
28 Aug 2026, 16:34
12,599
+4
27 Aug 2026, 15:05
12,595
+5
26 Aug 2026, 13:17
12,590
-2
24 Aug 2026, 15:48
12,592
-7
23 Aug 2026, 00:54
12,599
+1
20 Aug 2026, 13:52
12,598
-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:24
12,599
-4
18 Aug 2026, 13:04
12,603
first reading
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 12,550 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 52 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
52 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
26,129
Reactions total
683
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 12m
Average length
2m 16s
Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,103 reactions across 46 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,134
36.5%
🤬
689
22.2%
👍
515
16.6%
👏
395
12.7%
❤
349
11.2%
👎
9
0.29%
🤯
6
0.193%
🎉
2
0.064%
😁
2
0.064%
😢
2
0.064%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Abandonad toda esperanza mientras la gestión de la seguridad siga en manos de políticos obsesionados con el relato y serviles a Marruecos.
Mandan a policías y al Ejército desarmados, vendidos y en minoría a hacer de figurantes mientras Ceuta se convierte en un gueto. No protegen al pueblo ceutí; protegen su poltrona.
Difunde antes de que te impongan su amnesia programada.
🆃︎🆆︎🅸︎🆃︎🆃︎🅴︎🆁︎ ⤵️
https://x.com/PoliciaSXX…
Cinco folios de propaganda, “transversalidad” y burocracia para tapar el colapso de Ceuta.
🎬Nos lo cuenta Josema Vallejo, vicepresidente de @PoliciaSXXI:
El plan del Gobierno para la frontera: mando político con un filólogo al frente (Ángel Víctor Torres), cero operativa y blindaje mediático.
Ni refuerzos para los agentes, ni soluciones. Solo palabrería para gestionar el relato y, cuando todo reviente, culpar a ot…
El crimen organizado devora nuestras calles mientras las cúpulas policiales y el poder político se reparten medallas pensionadas.
Cuando OCON Sur empezó a seguir el rastro del dinero, fue desmantelado por orden política.
Si persigues al camello, llegas a la droga; si persigues el dinero, llegas al poder. ¿A quién estaban a punto de llegar para que liquidaran la unidad de un plumazo?
Padecemos un modelo policial ca…
Llevamos 10 años advirtiéndolo desde @PoliciaSXXI. Estudiamos lo ocurrido en Suecia, Francia y Bélgica y avisamos de lo que acabaría ocurriendo en España.
No cambiarán el discurso por las niñas agredidas ni por el dolor de las víctimas. Lo cambiarán cuando vean peligrar los votos.
Ahora veremos a tertulianos, analistas y partidos recoger cable a toda velocidad para salvar el sillón. No les importaba la seguridad de…
‼️Te venden integración, pero la realidad te estalla en la cara: un inmigrante ilegal marroquí que acaba de asaltar la frontera de Ceuta lo suelta sin inmutarse en televisión: "normal que las violen", culpando a los padres de la menor por no esconderlas.
Al mismo tiempo, miembros del Gobierno y sus miserables tertulianos de la corte señalan y tachan de racista al padre ceutí que tiene pánico de que agredan a su hija…
¿Por qué? Ésa es la pregunta que alguien debería responder sobre Ceuta.
¿Por qué se dejó a la primera línea abandonada a su suerte durante 72 horas? ¿Por qué los primeros grupos de intervención tuvieron que proteger a los políticos en lugar de estar donde se estaba desbordando la frontera?
¿Y por qué, días después, no se movilizaron masivamente los funcionarios necesarios para tramitar las expulsiones?
Cuando una …
Primero no dan órdenes. Después no actúan. Y finalmente, cuando llegan los muertos y las niñas violadas, Marlaska nos explica que «a veces suceden cosas». No, Marlaska. Las cosas no suceden solas.
Las decisiones que no se toman también tienen consecuencias. La incompetencia también mata. La cobardía en el mando también destruye vidas.
Pero aquí han descubierto el truco: si nadie da la orden, nadie responde. Y mient…
Familias encerradas durante días. Padres aterrados por el peligro de que asalten a sus hijas. Gente que no se atrevía ni a bajar a por pan hasta ver a los militares desplegados por las calles.
Y mientras el vecino vivía el miedo en primera persona, desde los platósw se dedicaban a llamarle racista y alarmista.
Esto es lo que ocurre cuando se abandona al ciudadano honrado y se criminaliza a quien exige seguridad.
🆃…
A un guardia civil le revientan la cara cinco delincuentes para robarle. Ceuta se llena de miedo, robos y cuchillos. Los policías están saturados mientras el Gobierno sigue fingiendo que no pasa nada.
Esto no es una crisis migratoria. Es una crisis de Estado provocada por quienes han decidido que controlar las fronteras es opcional.
Cuando el poder político abdica, la seguridad la paga el ciudadano.
🆃︎🆆︎🅸︎🆃︎🆃︎🅴︎🆁︎…
"Pedro Sánchez nos defiende". No lo dice un militante, lo dice un narco expulsado que ha vuelto a entrar por Ceuta. Y no le falta razón: el criminal sabe perfectamente quién legisla a su favor.
Cuando el delincuente siente que el Gobierno está de su lado, es porque el Gobierno ha dejado de estar del lado de los españoles honrados.
🆃︎🆆︎🅸︎🆃︎🆃︎🅴︎🆁︎ ⤵️
https://x.com/PoliciaSXXI/status/2091439329860071766
🅸︎🅽︎🆂︎🆃︎🅰︎🅶︎🆁…
🤬58👍9🔥8❤2😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @PoliciaSXXI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
POLICE FITNESS @policefitness · 22,324 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 21 September 2026
SPE INFORMACIÓN @SPE112 · 24,745 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
DESOKUPA OFICIAL @desokupaOficial · 47,139 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
Santiago Abascal 🇪🇸 @SantiagoAbascalPresidente · 39,865 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PoliciaSXXI - Canal Oficial” (@PoliciaSXXI), 12,550 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PoliciaSXXI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
