Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Police For Freedom NL

@PoliceForFreedomNL

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,829subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001151999685
TypeChannel
Username@PoliceForFreedomNL
Created4 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PoliceForFreedomNL

Growth

2,8292,8392,8346 August 2026 — 2,839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,839 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,838 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,834 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,829 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,828–2,841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:532,829-5
10 Aug 2026, 08:202,834-4
7 Aug 2026, 04:462,838-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:042,839no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:532,839first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 03m
Average length
12m 39s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,056 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
46744.2%
👍42640.3%
👏484.55%
🔥423.98%
👎171.61%
💯100.947%
🤡80.758%
🤨80.758%
😢70.663%
😁60.568%
🤯50.473%
🥴30.284%
20.189%
👌20.189%
💩10.095%
🤔10.095%
🥰10.095%
🥱10.095%
🫡10.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,056reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2024 to 19 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
4,300
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,160
over 18 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
iculiseerd125 February 202525 February 2025

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2024 to 19 November 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

10 Jun 2025, 17:03 UTC≈4,260 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Huisdieren worden systematisch uit de maatschappij georganiseerd via wetgeving en handhaving. Police For Freedom is aangesloten bij de organisatie: Kortsnuiten Blijven Bestaan. Zij maken zich hard voor op dit moment 25 soorten Kortsnuiten die dreigen te verdwijnen. Onze boxers horen daar ook bij. “De methode om te handhaven gaat niet over welzijn maar afschaffen” zegt KBB. Teken alsjeblieft de petitie en deel als j

👍147😢7💯32

6 May 2025, 17:05 UTC≈3,160 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Podcast 5 'Wat vind ik van Trump' In deze podcast leg ik uit hoe ik het groeiende verzet tegen Trump binnen onze bewegingen interpreteer. Wil je ons belonen, dan kan je dat doen door te like'n, delen en lid te worden van ons YouTube kanaal. Dank! https://youtu.be/_RDN8mDME8I

18👏2

3 May 2025, 18:19 UTC≈2,860 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Volgende Podcast komt dinsdag online! Tot dan!

👍2412

28 Apr 2025, 18:53 UTC≈3,230 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Podcast 4 Grote stroomstoring in Zuid-Europa en het Europese volk is oorlog beu. Deel aub en like, maar wanneer je kan abonneer je ook op ons YT kanaal. Enjoy! https://youtu.be/lfFRt040h6k?si=qxi_r1jAozhj6d70

25👍12

25 Apr 2025, 16:33 UTC≈2,180 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Podcast 3 Klokkenluiders vertellen over misstanden rond Claus Schwab. Of is dit een rookgordijn? In deze uitzending wordt vooral het verband gelegd met belangenverstrengeling bij bestuurders en als voorbeeld de bouwfraudeaffaire aangehaald en de illegale waterput van destijds de burgemeester van Almere, Jorritsma. Uiteraard worden zoals gewoonlijk de reacties van de vorige podcast doorgenomen. We vragen geen geld, ma

24👍4

21 Apr 2025, 14:25 UTC≈1,980 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Podcast 2 online Dennis geeft meer uitleg over het hoe en waarom over de opstart van een podcast. Ook komen ter sprake: Blckbx; fraude in de EU, eieren; en de reacties van de kijkers van de vorige podcast. Als laatste de vraag: “hoe zou deze podcast er uit moeten zien volgens jullie?” https://youtu.be/PkTBFrY4bB4

👍31👌1😁1

4 Apr 2025, 07:27 UTC≈2,530 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Verklaring vanuit het bestuur van blckbx https://www.blckbx.tv/nieuws/verklaring-vanuit-het-bestuur?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR06ovPILQMoZVjVKuo3etmINAoaYNJQhV7s-Yr9XLoQg_RryMk8--dyxfI_aem_Rbk0upjZwENzHtt_BG9stg

👎16🤨7👍6🥴3😁2

2 Apr 2025, 18:22 UTC≈3,500 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Flavio weg bij Blckbx Dit had ik niet zien aankomen. Ik zag wel dat de route en inhoud van BB me steeds minder raakte. Of dat ik m’n vertrouwen verloor. Ik heb Flavio in een persoonlijk bericht laten weten dat het me raakt wat hem overkomt. Ik heb hem sterkte gewenst. Z’n levenswerk of in elk geval 1 ervan is nu kapot. Maar waar je een plank leeg maakt in je kast, ontstaat ruimte voor hele mooie nieuwe dingen. We m

50👍11🤯5🤡3🔥1🤨1

2 Mar 2025, 19:00 UTC≈2,610 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍6610🔥10👏6🤔1🫡1

2 Mar 2025, 18:36 UTC≈2,510 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Police For Freedom weer actief! Misschien is het u niet ontgaan dat we na lange tijd weer actief zijn op de P4F-socials. Waarom we eerst stil waren en nu weer van ons laten horen – én met welk doel – leg ik uit in deze video. Dennis

👍208👏1

25 Feb 2025, 18:57 UTC≈4,300 views155 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid iculiseerd

De kwestie ON Mijn mening: Kort en duidelijk: er komt geen uitleg vanuit ON. Als iemand heeft gezegd dat ongevaccineerden opgesloten mochten worden, dan is dat zo fout geweest dat er geen woorden voor zijn. Als diegene ook nog eens een platform had, dan droeg hij actief bij aan maatschappelijk conformisme. Daarmee heeft hij – bewust of onbewust – de mogelijkheid voor lief genomen dat iemand door zijn toedoen zou me

👍10826👏10🔥8💯2🥱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @PoliceForFreedomNL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 599,372 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Police For Freedom NL” (@PoliceForFreedomNL), 2,829 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PoliceForFreedomNL.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.