Chart looking good sitting at 222k mcap 2x from my drop. NFA
Signed Poise | $$$

Channel
@PoiseDrop
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001785856327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PoiseDrop |
| Description | @Poise_eth β οΈ ALWAYS DYOR AND TAYOR β οΈ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PoiseDrop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 32 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 32 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 December 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 11 | 73.3% | |
| π₯ | 4 | 26.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2024 to 6 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Chart looking good sitting at 222k mcap 2x from my drop. NFA
Signed Poise | $$$
0x38Ed1701EB1D3299313aB48324dBBE38A4684BA3 Base chain π 100k gambled NFA
Signed Poise | $$$
0xcAb254f1a32343f11aB41fbdE90eCB410cDe348a 560k mcap Gud dip is 300K/400K NFA
π₯1
Signed Poise | $$$
Poise Drop | 100x π pinned Β«Recap for the last 7 drops from 2024 $ERIC Dropped 1.9m mcap ATH is 4m. 2x from dropππ $SPQR Dropped 100k mcap ATH almost 200k. 2x from drop ππ $DOGEFATHER Dropped 1.1m mcap ATH is 7.7m. x7 from drop πππππππ $AMEN Dropped 950k mcap ATH is 8.3m. x8.7 fromβ¦Β»
Recap for the last 7 drops from 2024 $ERIC Dropped 1.9m mcap ATH is 4m. 2x from dropππ $SPQR Dropped 100k mcap ATH almost 200k. 2x from drop ππ $DOGEFATHER Dropped 1.1m mcap ATH is 7.7m. x7 from drop πππππππ $AMEN Dropped 950k mcap ATH is 8.3m. x8.7 from drop πππππππππ $CELEST Dropped 250k mcap. ATH is 430k. x1.72 from drop π $CULT Dropped 240m mcap. Current mcap is 87m β $HOODRAT Dropped 320k map ATH is 1.57mβ¦
π₯2
Signed Poise | $$$
Video, posted without a caption
π₯1
Signed Poise | $$$
Hoodrat Buy! π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ π΅ 0.214 ETH ($737.08) πͺ 199,485,498,627 HOODRAT π· 0x3fc9β¦7fad | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $1,566,682 π Chart π΅ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
Signed Poise | $$$
Hoodrat Buy! π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ π΅ 1.00 ETH ($3422.59) πͺ 1,186,279,582,011 HOODRAT π· 0x2681β¦379c | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $1,282,235 π Chart π΅ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
Signed Poise | $$$
Hoodrat Buy! π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦π¦ π΅ 0.147 ETH ($500.00) πͺ 218,054,782,502 HOODRAT π· 0x3fc9β¦7fad | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $970,962 π Chart π΅ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
Signed Poise | $$$
0xDee6cDd28Da9f51e3A8421395973894a884F3B2D 320k mcap Wait dip. Nfa
Signed Poise | $$$
0x0000000000c5dc95539589fbD24BE07c6C14eCa4 600m mcap Wait fucking dip. Trying to find gud entry. Still high ca balance as of now. https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xC4ce8E63921b8B6cBdB8fCB6Bd64cC701Fb926f2?t=1733704382643 β οΈ NFA β οΈ
Signed Poise | $$$
π₯ GMGN: Fastest SOL Charts!
β€2
Signed Poise | $$$
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PoiseDrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@PoiseDrop named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βPoise Drop | 100x πβ (@PoiseDrop), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PoiseDrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.