Channel
@Podkamenev
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,029subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001721352281 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Podkamenev |
| Description | Журналист По вопросам @podk19 |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Podkamenev |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 1,029 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 1,029 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
239 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 77 | 32.2% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 15.9% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 14.2% | |
| 🤣 | 30 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 8.37% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 5.02% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 3.35% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 2.51% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 1.26% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.837% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.418% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Юмор дня 😂 Простая попытка напомнить о гигиене в США переросла в сущий кошмар. В сети появился наглядный пример, как не надо заниматься графическим дизайном. Идея была простой — призвать людей чаще мыть руки, но посетители видели на изображении что угодно, кроме самого процесса мытья рук. Но самое интересное, что призыв сработал! Дизайн был настолько кошмарным, что люди пугались и мыли руки чаще, чтобы избежать уг…
🤣14🙈2👍1
https://youtu.be/3aNyw6mAIUE?si=rHyVucK2LzRUhWV7 Выпустил обзор на "Алису в стране чудес", буду рад вашей активности🙌
❤6👍2
Уже видели, как Китай ускакал от всего мира в робототехнике? Когда там скайнет обещали?😂
🔥11🤡1
❤️❤️❤️ Сначала нам двадцать лет подряд открывали окна в западный мир: фильмы, сериалы, музыка, реклама, валентинки. Нас аккуратно приучали к тому, что 14 февраля- это про цветы, неловкие признания и вот это всё. А теперь вдруг делают вид, что это чужое, вредное и вообще «не наше». Факт первый: поколение, которое сейчас 20–35, выросло уже с этим праздником. Для них Валентин не «католический заговор», а первый букет в…
❤26👍7
Вот про рубль мужик отчасти правильно говорит. Сильный рубль в действительности никому не нужен кроме нас с вами
❤4
Мне на самом деле страшно представить, что будет с ценами когда рубль подешевеет 😳
👍2
Потому что инфляция не градусник. Это распределение боли. И тут работает эффект Кантильона, деньги в экономику приходят не «всем поровну», а сначала к тем, кто ближе к источнику, к крупным получателям финансирования, к тем, кто первым получает доступ к дешёвому кредиту и большим потокам. Они покупают и фиксируют себе “старую реальность”. Остальные получают “новую”, когда цены уже перестроились. В России это особенно …
😭4👍2
Росстат говорит, что инфляция в 2025 году 5,59%. А ощущение такое, будто нас тихо обули на все двадцать. Почему?
💯7
Действительно раздражает эта разбивка в ценниках на 100гр😵💫
💯18🤬2
Столовый вайб😅 Есть физики среди нас? Он радиоктивен?
🤣14🔥2
https://companiesmarketcap.com/tech/largest-tech-companies-by-market-cap/ Рейтинг топ-100 крупнейших технологических компаний мира
Мы не в списке Листал ленту и наткнулся на свежий рейтинг ста крупнейших технологических компаний мира. Nvidia на первом месте, далее Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon. У США шестьдесят компаний. У Китая тринадцать. Тайвань, Южная Корея, Германия, Индия. Даже у Таиланда и Аргентины по одной. Российских 0. Я перечитал. Проскролил вниз. Может, где-то в конце? Может, мелким шрифтом? Нет. Ноль. Ни Яндекса, ни Касперског…
👍12🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Podkamenev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,158,297 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОДКАМЕНЕВ” (@Podkamenev), 1,029 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Podkamenev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.