Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

πŸš€ Feedback | POCKET ROBOT

@Po_broker_feedback

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,987subscribers

+91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003358967740
TypeChannel
Username@Po_broker_feedback
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Po_broker_feedback

Growth

1,8961,9871,941.57 August 2026 β€” 1,896 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,896 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 1,901 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 1,936 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 1,987 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,882–2,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:571,987+51
11 Aug 2026, 05:031,936+35
7 Aug 2026, 23:351,901+5
7 Aug 2026, 20:461,896no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:541,896first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
96.9%
avg views Γ· 1,987 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,930
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.364%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held10 (25 May 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total3,850
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘3934.2%
❀3631.6%
πŸ”₯2219.3%
πŸ‘65.26%
🀣65.26%
😁32.63%
πŸ’―21.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTCβ‰ˆ1,550 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Another champion🚬 "When I first funded my account, I lost everything trying to meet the turnover requirement. But after reaching out for guidance and following your advice, everything turned around. This withdrawal might seem small to some, but to me it's the biggest milestone of my entire trading career." Same story as always - it wasn't luck, it was finally doing it the smart way. Reached out, adjusted the approac…

πŸ‘4❀3πŸ”₯2

28 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTCβ‰ˆ2,300 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Been a minute since I posted your reviews - let's fix that πŸ”₯ Small balance, big lesson 🧠 Respect to this trader for the hustle on a micro balance - but even more respect for what they did next Started small - barely enough room for a normal drawdown. Ran it up, then made the smart call: pulled profits and rebuilt with a real buffer That right there is the actual skill. Not the run itself - the discipline to lock …

πŸ‘4❀1

9 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTCβ‰ˆ3,580 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

New feedback from our trader πŸ“Š That’s what happens when you trade with a plan No gambling. No tilt. No β€œwin it back fast” nonsense. Just a clean, systematic approach with Pocket Robot - and the result speaks for itself πŸ‘‰ @PO_BROKER_BOT - AI for traders who actually think first 🧠 πŸ’¬ @Apex_Victor - Questions? DM me πŸ™Œ

❀6πŸ‘6πŸ‘3πŸ”₯3πŸ’―2

7 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTCβ‰ˆ3,080 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Another real review just landed in my DMs πŸ”₯ This is exactly what I keep telling you fam - demo first, find your method, then go real. Nice and steady, no rushing it. That's how you actually get somewhere with this thing πŸ’ͺ Not instant wins. Just better habits, cleaner sessions, less chaos. πŸ‘‰ @PO_BROKER_BOT - test it, learn it, trade it πŸ’¬ @Apex_Victor - Questions? DM me πŸ™Œ

πŸ‘6πŸ”₯3❀1

6 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTCβ‰ˆ2,680 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This guy just methodically stacks his balance without stopping. No oversized risks, no gambling, just steady consistent income πŸ”₯ This is exactly who the bot was built for. Want the same? 😏 πŸ‘‰ @PO_BROKER_BOT - steady wins over time πŸ’¬ @Apex_Victor - I'll set you up right 🀝

πŸ”₯5

2 Jul 2026, 14:42 UTCβ‰ˆ3,400 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

From $500 to $1065 in 5 days. Not a single lost trade πŸ”₯ "After 5 days of trading, following your instructions religiously, I am on $1065 πŸ‘πŸ‘Œ" "1 or 3$ trades, every 30 minutes or hour, 10 second expiration weekdays and 15 second expiration weekends, thankfully I have not lost a single trade πŸ™ thank you Victor" This is what happens when someone actually follows the rules instead of winging it. Small trades, patience…

πŸ‘4πŸ”₯2❀1

28 Jun 2026, 14:56 UTCβ‰ˆ3,390 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This guy gets it. Even the best tool out there has rules you gotta respect: 1️⃣ Pick the right strategy for your balance βœ… 2️⃣ Don't oversize your trades βœ… 3️⃣ Don't run too many sessions back to back so the platform's algorithms can't adapt to the bot's patterns and screw it over βœ… Result? Wall of green screenshots. Chipping away small consistent profits that add up to something real πŸ’° You with us? 😏 πŸ‘‰ @PO_BROKE…

❀6πŸ‘4πŸ”₯2

15 Jun 2026, 07:56 UTCβ‰ˆ4,740 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This guy turned the bot into a personal sneaker fund πŸ˜‚ Air Max 90s paid for in 2 days. "I got a problem but at least it's a profitable problem" - can't even argue with that πŸ”₯ No it's not a Ferrari. But that's his goal and who are we to judge 😏 Everyone's got their thing. The tool just makes it happen. Got a story like this? Send it over - 500 πŸ’Ž tokens for a solid review πŸ‘‰ @PO_BROKER_BOT - what are you spending yo…

❀9🀣6😁3

3 Jun 2026, 09:15 UTCβ‰ˆ4,620 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This one hit different πŸ’ͺ $500 in. $3k in a month. Withdrew $2k. And then: "I quit my job bro πŸ˜‚ now I can actually take my time and find something decent without stressing about how I'm gonna eat" That's what this is about fam. Not Lambos. Not flexing. Just breathing room. Freedom to make choices without panic. Did I tell him he's withdrawing too early? Yeah 😏 But it's his money and he made the right call for hims…

πŸ‘7❀5

25 May 2026, 15:49 UTCβ‰ˆ4,840 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ever wonder what's actually happening when you hit that button? 🚬 Under the hood the bot runs two AI engines simultaneously: 🧠 Opus 4.7 - deep market analysis layer ⚑ Codex GPT - real-time execution engine Here's what they do in those couple of minutes: πŸ“Š Scan 20+ technical indicators across multiple timeframes πŸ“° Parse breaking financial news in real time 🌐 Crawl social media for insider sentiment and early signa…

πŸ‘7πŸ”₯5❀4

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Po_broker_feedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸš€ Feedback | POCKET ROBOT” (@Po_broker_feedback), 1,987 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Po_broker_feedback.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.