Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net -635. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,087–25,912 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 00:18
25,182
-38
16 Sept 2026, 15:36
25,220
-24
14 Sept 2026, 18:16
25,244
-18
13 Sept 2026, 04:19
25,262
-23
11 Sept 2026, 07:00
25,285
-33
8 Sept 2026, 11:20
25,318
-51
5 Sept 2026, 05:59
25,369
-34
3 Sept 2026, 10:43
25,403
-13
2 Sept 2026, 05:43
25,416
-17
1 Sept 2026, 08:45
25,433
-13
31 Aug 2026, 06:06
25,446
-26
30 Aug 2026, 03:14
25,472
-9
29 Aug 2026, 06:28
25,481
-17
28 Aug 2026, 09:02
25,498
-14
27 Aug 2026, 11:56
25,512
-3
26 Aug 2026, 12:06
25,515
-18
25 Aug 2026, 08:33
25,533
-9
24 Aug 2026, 11:38
25,542
-18
22 Aug 2026, 18:59
25,560
-17
21 Aug 2026, 09:23
25,577
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,166 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
7,166
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2023 to 10 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌این حروم زاده ننه موش با برگزار کردن ایردراپ های فیک و غیر قابل فروش، اقدام به جذب ممبر برای چنل هاش میکنه
📛توکن هایی که به عنوان پاداش ایردراپ میده که اکثرا خودش ساخته و قیمتشون فیکه و هیچ ارزشی ندارن
⚠️⚠️اما اصل ماجرا⚠️⚠️
این لاش گوشت با تشویق مردم به سرمایه گذاری توی ربات های دوبلی و اسکم که ساخته تاحالا از صد ها نفر کلاه برداری کرده و شگردش هم اینه که یه ویدیو درست میکنه و میگه توی بات باگ پیدا کرده و تضمین م…
و بازم حرومزادگی های دیگر.. 🩸
❗️عزیزان این شخص همه افرادی که بالای 5000 دلار دارند رو جمع کرده و امشب میخواد یه ارز فیک که مال خودشه معرفی کنه و بعدش همه بیان بخرند و بعد نتونن بفروشن .. یعنی وقتی میخرید پولتون میره به حساب این شخص.😐
اطلاع رسانی کنید و اینپست رو بفرستید به نزدیکانتان تا گیر این شیاد نیافتند ♥️
همانطوری که میدونید من رو خدا خیلی حساسم .
حتی اسمشرو هم رو بیوی این چنل نوشتم
به الله قسم همین فرد رو نمیزارم تو مجازی بمونه.. با اراده الله دست به دست هم میدیم تا این شیاد رو از تلگرام و بقیه شبکه های مجازی بیرون کنیم.
این شخص با نام بردن اسم خداوند سعی در بالا کشیدن پول شمارا دارد.
عزیز تیم ما و خود بنده به شدت رو خدا حساسیم..
کاری نکن کاری کنیمم مجازی واست بشه جهنم
یعنی واقعا مردم ایران خیلی گاوون که همچین آدمایی رو دنبال میکنن و عواقبش رو نمیدونن!!
علی حسنی کلاهبردار هست لطفا لطفا فریب حرفهای این شیاد رو نخورید از ترسش فرار کرده به دبی . اگه ایران بود زنده نمیزاشتیمش
❗️به افراد اتک زن گفتم امشب آن باشن که با خیلیا کار داریم.. اول یه چند نفر رو معرفی میکنیم که کلاهبردارن بعدش میریم اتک بزنیم تا آدم بشن 👌♥️
خطاب به بعضی کلاهبرداران.. 😉
#کلاهبردار_4
5⃣ #کلاهبردار_پامپ_دامپ
6⃣ #کلاهبردار_ارز_فیک
◀️ چند سال پیش 600 میلیون دلار پول مردم رو با ارز فیک PEX بالا کشید و فرار کرد به دبی الان هم یه بات آورده میگه ممبر بیارید دلار بدم... کهکاملا دروغه .. طرف یک حرومزاده ای بیشنیست..🩸
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PoShTpArDe_MaJaZi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
8
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
7
vacant every time we have ever looked
@PoShTpArDe_MaJaZi named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@workerfiy_support named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@trade_omay named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@tradeadam_ad named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@twtrussairdrop named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@vipworkerfiy named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@workerfiy named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@drop_lucky named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
@workerfiytreader named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معرفی کلاهبردارن مجازی ☝️” (@PoShTpArDe_MaJaZi), 25,182 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PoShTpArDe_MaJaZi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
