Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PlutonAI

@PlutonAIHQ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

26,408subscribers

-248 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179699875
TypeChannel
Username@PlutonAIHQ
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PlutonAIHQ

Growth

26,40826,65626,5327 August 2026 — 26,656 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,648 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,625 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,573 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,520 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,467 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,424 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,408 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -248. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,371–26,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:5426,408-16
12 Aug 2026, 08:3426,424-43
11 Aug 2026, 09:3226,467-53
10 Aug 2026, 07:1526,520-53
9 Aug 2026, 03:5426,573-52
8 Aug 2026, 01:5826,625-23
7 Aug 2026, 03:4726,648-8
7 Aug 2026, 00:4726,656first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.85%
avg views ÷ 26,408 subscribers
Avg views / post
225
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.702%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held24 (3 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,796
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👌583.3%
💯116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTCviews —

PlutonAI pinned «The next wave of crypto won't be about owning tokens. It will be about owning intelligence. AI Agents will research. AI Agents will trade. AI Agents will build. The question is: Will you use them… or will you own them? The Agent Economy is coming. 👉🏻…»

12 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC75 viewsread 12 August 2026

The next wave of crypto won't be about owning tokens. It will be about owning intelligence. AI Agents will research. AI Agents will trade. AI Agents will build. The question is: Will you use them… or will you own them? The Agent Economy is coming. 👉🏻 https://x.com/PlutonAIHQ/status/2087192317958435103

7 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTCviews —

PlutonAI pinned «Imagine having an AI Agent that works for you 24/7. It watches markets. It analyzes opportunities. It filters information. It protects your portfolio. What would be the first task you would give your personal AI Agent? 👇 Tell us. 👉🏻 https://x.com/Plut…»

7 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC198 viewsread 12 August 2026

Imagine having an AI Agent that works for you 24/7. It watches markets. It analyzes opportunities. It filters information. It protects your portfolio. What would be the first task you would give your personal AI Agent? 👇 Tell us. 👉🏻 https://x.com/PlutonAIHQ/status/2085637064926872038

6 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC192 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The AI landscape is changing faster than ever. ✅ New models. ✅ New capabilities. ✅ New opportunities. But intelligence alone is not enough. The future belongs to systems that can: • Think • Adapt • Execute • Collaborate AI Agents are becoming the new digital workforce.

3 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTCviews —

PlutonAI pinned «A prediction: In the next few years, everyone will have multiple AI Agents. 🔬 One for research. 💱 One for finance. 🦾 One for productivity. 🪄 One for creativity. The question is not: "Will AI Agents exist?" The question is: "Which Agents will you trust?"…»

3 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC230 viewsread 12 August 2026

A prediction: In the next few years, everyone will have multiple AI Agents. 🔬 One for research. 💱 One for finance. 🦾 One for productivity. 🪄 One for creativity. The question is not: "Will AI Agents exist?" The question is: "Which Agents will you trust?" View X post: https://x.com/PlutonAIHQ/status/2084185263790498011

29 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC271 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The State of DeFAI 🧵 Everyone talks about AI trading crypto. That's not where DeFAI is heading. The real shift is toward autonomous financial infrastructure where AI doesn't just analyze markets, but coordinates wallets, protocols, liquidity & execution across multiple chains. Read more on X 👉🏻 https://x.com/PlutonAIHQ/status/2082363033918001448

27 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTCviews —

PlutonAI pinned «PlutonAI Update - Our AI stack just got a major upgrade. Instead of relying on a single AI model, PlutonAI now integrates the world's leading AI providers into one unified ecosystem. 🧠⚡️ Read mor on X thread 👉🏻 https://x.com/PlutonAIHQ/status/2081631413107863565»

27 Jul 2026, 06:44 UTC240 viewsread 12 August 2026

PlutonAI Update - Our AI stack just got a major upgrade. Instead of relying on a single AI model, PlutonAI now integrates the world's leading AI providers into one unified ecosystem. 🧠⚡️ Read mor on X thread 👉🏻 https://x.com/PlutonAIHQ/status/2081631413107863565

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @PlutonAIHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 782,094 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PlutonAI” (@PlutonAIHQ), 26,408 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PlutonAIHQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.