nanti aku hapus kalian dari banned tapi tetep diremove kok, jadi kalian bisa isi ini, ya. aku move ch, jadi kalian nggak usah subs ch ini, ntar aku hit kalian

Channel
𝐌EM♡RiA
@PlumFairies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001204406703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PlumFairies |
| Created | 11 December 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PlumFairies |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 7 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 11 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
⚠️ BACA DULU JIMOOTS ⚠️ halo jimoots! sebelumnya aku minta maaf udah unsubs ch kalian, kalian juga udah aku remove kok. Disini aku mau move ch, karena aku udah muak sama orang yang unsubs pake web, curang, unsubs pas aku lagi rest, padahal di dn nya udah dipasang kalo aku lagi resting. so? kalo kalian mau jadi moots aku lagi, ayo kita sfs lagi sama @oliviakye! drop your @ main acc + id ch kamu yaa, ntar aku hit sec…
⚠️ HELP FW ! Gak tau jaman sekarang masih aja ada yang nyolong usn punya orang. Tolong balikin @JuseonLee dong please? Itu punya aku. Buktinya ini ada, asalnya aku kasih ke temen aku, karena gak di pake sama dia, aku minta balikin dan mau aku jual. Please buat kamu yang nge keep usn aku, boleh balikin nggaa? please, aku beli pake uang bukan nyari. Nanti aku kasih yang lain, asal jangan yang Juyeon ini :(. Aku tau ka…
File, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
OO.OO ily Juyeon.
。゚゚・。・゚゚。♡︎% to be honest️ what do you think about jiyabie ?[ ...🗯] !?
- humble person,a good listener,pwetty and - eu positif vibes! (๑♡⌓♡๑)56%
- happy virus,talkative person && has a good advice. i want to get closer!💌💗40%
- popular moot,mixes well with any♡ne,easy to interact,fwends with evewyone!(☆▽☆)17%
- lowkey intimidating,just mutual,has many fwends but a total soft - ie!˃ ⌑ ˂ഃ16%
- i have crush on you,LOML,ily ily!whOopsie!💭🎀15%
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Signed JiYABIEEEE ♡! #HappyEunhaDay
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
Signed ⋆ pouwshiē loving renjun ⁱ)ɢFʰᵏ
Hula Hoop! ㅤㅤ
Signed ✰ヾcloωniȇ p᥆ωmiyo 。🧺 💭
https://t.me/piyouchie/3 https://t.me/piyouchie/5
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @PlumFairies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
。゚゚・。・゚゚。♡︎% to be honest️ what do you think about jiyabie ?[ ...🗯] !?
- humble person,a good listener,pwetty and - eu positif vibes! (๑♡⌓♡๑)56%
- happy virus,talkative person && has a good advice. i want to get closer!💌💗40%
- popular moot,mixes well with any♡ne,easy to interact,fwends with evewyone!(☆▽☆)17%
- lowkey intimidating,just mutual,has many fwends but a total soft - ie!˃ ⌑ ˂ഃ16%
- i have crush on you,LOML,ily ily!whOopsie!💭🎀15%
The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2020 to 13 December 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@PlumFairies named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
named in 1 post, 1 September 2026 – 1 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐌EM♡RiA” (@PlumFairies), 7 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PlumFairies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.