Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Play Integrity Updates

@PlayIntegrityUpdates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,634subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002397734462
TypeChannel
Username@PlayIntegrityUpdates
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PlayIntegrityUpdates

Growth

2,6302,6342,6327 August 2026 — 2,630 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,630 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,634 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,629–2,635 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:532,634+4
8 Aug 2026, 01:442,630no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:032,630first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 2,634 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 April 20261 August 2026)
Views total3,569
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

540 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣21840.4%
😱7714.3%
👎407.41%
🖕264.81%
234.26%
🎉234.26%
🔥203.70%
🗿152.78%
👍142.59%
💩122.22%
🤔101.85%
🤡101.85%
😢91.67%
😭91.67%
🥰50.926%
😁40.741%
🤬40.741%
🫡40.741%
🌚30.556%
👏30.556%
7 further kinds112.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 540reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC789 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 883205cf28799fc6ef7365642fd7c54d, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE de41d8bcbf87427abfe9c530269792dc, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣5😢4🎉2😁1

29 Jul 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 787f5e274f9925379a98b34cb0cf67e6, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE b84c8d317d9a09e35d40cec2191cc4, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🔥6🤣4🎉1💊1

19 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,710 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 14748915730585814559, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 17437696269731004568, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 3d167f1f5cbb6a7d04db147133e4c4d, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 5271999852098378861, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 6b2066548debcabe52b30462166da4bc, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 8561666443580248416, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣11👍2🎉1🤓1🤬1🥰1

14 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC≈8,470 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 11399862499329175696, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 203667797246764962, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣8🤓2😭2🎉1

8 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC≈2,740 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Play Integrity Incidents Updated incident: https://status.play.google.com/incidents/JgDjJTkPysxHKXw8Hdtp Updates: [SERVICE_DISRUPTION] (7/2/26, 9:49 AM EST): We're investigating reports of an issue with Play Integrity API. We will provide more information shortly. The affected users are able to access Play Integrity API, but are seeing error messages, high latency, and/or other unexpected behavior. [SERVICE_DISRUPTIO

🔥7👍1

2 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC≈3,090 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Play Integrity Incidents Updated incident: https://status.play.google.com/incidents/JgDjJTkPysxHKXw8Hdtp Updates: [SERVICE_DISRUPTION] (7/2/26, 9:49 AM EST): We're investigating reports of an issue with Play Integrity API. We will provide more information shortly. The affected users are able to access Play Integrity API, but are seeing error messages, high latency, and/or other unexpected behavior. [SERVICE_DISRUPTIO

🗿10👎62

2 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,740 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Play Integrity Incidents New incident: https://status.play.google.com/incidents/JgDjJTkPysxHKXw8Hdtp Updates: [SERVICE_DISRUPTION] (7/2/26, 9:49 AM EST): We're investigating reports of an issue with Play Integrity API. We will provide more information shortly. The affected users are able to access Play Integrity API, but are seeing error messages, high latency, and/or other unexpected behavior.

💩9🌚3

29 Jun 2026, 21:32 UTC≈11,100 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 1e2e196b863817cc0d71fa1122f1a06d, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE cc75ce27f02b3d552da9a75c29a0ffb0, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣14👍2

29 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC≈10,200 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 325cb9fb9a68828bd3e827f02e829243, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 95c8515d2b9ba672dec63f320be12b6e, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣16👎41

26 Jun 2026, 20:58 UTC≈3,190 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 11320786801945374527, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 13144641322120335079, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 3ef2120badfb6ee01a9063b83725fc4c, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 51194c3000879492f54fc0b3d5c36b9f, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 6045824f1f922a6fbffb10840cf51c01, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 859bb16c462157fa9d8f2862f6b488ec, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE aad8010395da04fb78f72359d4e77b54, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE b1caaffcf42c117d683

😱12🤣93🖕3🤬3🗿2🏆1👍1

16 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC≈3,260 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations c086af6799c91bf127524cdc64c1f015, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE c44cb6c9091af4cf39408fe632aeb94e, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣21👎4🖕3🤡3👨‍💻1

15 Jun 2026, 21:41 UTC≈12,300 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

KeyBox revocations 73b6027f85820ee4a0e57c87c7ce1e20, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE 9369f2ef889419b8d5d69c4958a86441, REVOKED, KEY_COMPROMISE

🤣25👎83🔥2😭2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PlayIntegrityUpdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 148,111 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Play Integrity Updates” (@PlayIntegrityUpdates), 2,634 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PlayIntegrityUpdates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.