Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 43 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 June 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
44 measurements spanning 96 days, net +6,225. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,262–13,878 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 10:38
12,552
-94
9 Nov 2026, 17:34
12,646
-100
8 Nov 2026, 10:50
12,746
-64
7 Nov 2026, 06:45
12,810
-23
5 Nov 2026, 08:01
12,833
-1
4 Nov 2026, 09:09
12,834
-8
3 Nov 2026, 08:41
12,842
-21
2 Nov 2026, 11:06
12,863
+14
1 Nov 2026, 09:09
12,849
+1
31 Oct 2026, 12:06
12,848
-4
30 Oct 2026, 11:51
12,852
-9
29 Oct 2026, 11:21
12,861
+2
28 Oct 2026, 10:31
12,859
+4
27 Oct 2026, 08:08
12,855
+4
26 Oct 2026, 11:37
12,851
-9
25 Oct 2026, 13:14
12,860
-9
24 Oct 2026, 11:55
12,869
-4
23 Oct 2026, 10:11
12,873
-11
22 Oct 2026, 10:20
12,884
+8
21 Oct 2026, 01:08
12,876
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 12,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.212%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
50 (23 June 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
10,155
Reactions total
18
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 21:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
41
Videos
10
Links
92
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
50 reactions across 25 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 98.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
49
98.0%
👍
1
2.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴توضيح لطلاب السنة الأولى – بخصوص معادلة مقرر اللغة الإنجليزية
أوضحت الجامعة شروط معادلة مقرر اللغة الإنجليزية، وفق الآتي:
• المعادلة المباشرة: يشترط الحصول على 83 درجة فأعلى في اختبار STEP، أو 5.5 فأعلى في اختبار IELTS.
• في حال كانت الدرجة أقل من المطلوب: إذا حصل الطالب على درجة من 60 إلى أقل من 83 في اختبار STEP، أو من 4 إلى أقل من 5.5 في اختبار IELTS، فلا يمكنه الاستفادة من المعادلة المباشرة حاليًا
ولكن يمكنه…
⏩بخصوص كود كتاب اللغة الإنجليزية
للطلاب اللي واجهتهم مشكلة أو تأخر عليهم وصول كود الكتاب، وصلنا هذا الرابط من الدكاترة، واللي يتيح لكم الاستعلام عن أكوادكم مباشرة بدلًا من رفع تذكرة الدعم الفني وانتظار الرد.
🔗 https://tickets.aljadawel.sa/code-lookup
طريقة الاستعلام:
▪️ الدخول على الرابط.
▪️إدخال البريد الجامعي.
▪️إدخال رقم الهوية الوطنية.
▪️الضغط على «عرض أكوادي».
✔️ إذا كان الكود متوفرًا لكم في النظام، بيظهر لك…
🔴توضيح بشأن التحويل لطلاب السنة الأولى (التحضيرية):
لن تتاح لكم خدمة التحويل خلال هذا الفصل لعدم وجود معدل تراكمي للمفاضلة
وقد تتاح في الفصل الثاني بعد ظهور المعدل، لكن تقديم الطلب لا يعني الموافقة عليه؛ إذ يُشترط اجتياز السنة الأولى، ولا تُقبل طلبات التحويل إلا بعد اجتياز السنة الأولى بنجاح؛ لذلك لن تتم الموافقة على طلبات الطلاب الذين لم يستوفوا هذا الشرط
🥱بخصوص شراء الكتاب الإلكتروني لمقرر مهارات اللغة الإنجليزية .
حسب البريد المرسل من الجامعة، أصبح بإمكان الطلاب شراء الكتاب الإلكتروني من خلال منصة تنفيذي.
🔗منصة تنفيذي👇:
https://learn.seu.edu.sa
تقدر التسجيل باستخدام البريد الجامعي أو أي بريد إلكتروني آخر حسب الايميل المرسل، مع ضرورة إدخال رقم الهوية.
📌كما أرفقت الجامعة دليلًا يوضح خطوات شراء الكتاب وسبق إرساله لكم ( ملف التعليميات )👇
https://t.me/Plans_seu/603
🔴تنبيه مهم لطلاب السنة الأولى المشتركة
تُغلق المعادلة للترم الاول بتاريخ 26 نوفمبر 2026م، ولم يتبقَّ على موعد الإغلاق سوى شهر واحد
📌المصادر المعتمدة للمذاكرة:
▪️ أرشيف ستيب : اضغط هنا
▪️ قروب ستيب : اضغط هنا
▪️ أرشيف التوفل TOEFL : اضغط هنا
▪️ أرشيف الآيلتس IELTS : اضغط هنا
🌧️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌧️
🔺مميزات معادلة الإنجليزي خلال هذا الترم:
• اجتياز المادة بـ درجة الحد الادنى : تُحتسب المعادلة بنهاية الترم الأول، وبذلك تُعتبر م…
كتاب اللغة الإنجليزية
تم تحديد مستوى الشعبة، تأكدوا من المستوى مع الدكتور، وتم تفعيل خانة شراء الكتاب في البلاك بورد.
خيارات الشراء:
🔹موقع أدلاس: 207 ريال، الكود يصلكم فورًا
🔗https://adlasonline.com
للمزيد من التفاصيل : اضغط هنا
🔹موقع الجامعة: 217 ريال، الكود خلال يومين إلى 5 أيام
🔗http://ac.seu.edu.sa/books-pay
للمزيد من التفاصيل : اضغط هنا
⚠️ مهم: تأكدوا من اختيار المستوى الصحيح واستخدام البريد الجامعي وليس …
بالنسبة لبيانات اثبات السداد👇:
تدخل بيانات الشخص اللي حوّل المبلغ من حسابه، مو بياناتك أنت إذا كان شخص ثاني هو اللي سدد عنك.
لأن النموذج مكتوب فيه " بيانات المودع "
• الاسم ورقم الهوية:
للشخص اللي حوّل المبلغ.
• اسم البنك والآيبان:
للحساب اللي تم التحويل منه.
• تاريخ التحويل والمبلغ ورقم المرجع:
تنقلها من إيصال الحوالة.
• إيصال التحويل:
ترفق صورة الإيصال.
☑ الخلاصة:
إذا أبوك أو أخوك أو أي شخص سدد عنك، تدخل بياناته…
🔴هذا الايميل للطلاب اللي وصلهم وما سبق رفع اثبات السداد ( ايصال التحويل ).
عن طريق الخدمات الالكترونية > اثبات سداد رسوم القبول الجامعي
اللي سبق رفع يتجاهل الايميل ويتابع حالة الطلب لين تتحدث
🔴ضروري تقديم الطلب عشان الخدمات الالكترونية ما تتقفل عليك
🔴حتى لو سبق انك ارفقت في منصة قبول ارفق مرة ثانية في خدمك اثبات سداد رسوم القبول الجامعي
⚠️ تنبيه مهم لجميع الطلاب والطالبات بخصوص قروبات الواتساب
انتبهوا من قروبات الواتساب، فالموضوع مو بسيط، وقد يعرّضكم للنصب والاحتيال أو استغلال بياناتكم الشخصية.
سبق وحذّرنا من هالموضوع، وللأسف ما زالت محاولات النصب مستمرة. ونؤكد لكم أن الغالبية العظمى من قروبات الواتساب المنتشرة لا تمثلنا، ولا نعرف القائمين عليها، ولا نتحمل مسؤولية ما يُنشر فيها.
لا تنخدعون بالأسماء أو الشعارات أو الادعاء بأن القروب رسمي أو تابع ل…
بخصوص الي يطلع له انه غايب بالاختبار وهو مختبر
توّي مخلص اتصال مع العميد وأكد لي إن المشكلة تقنية وعامة، وتظهر للجميع، لذلك تحديث الدرجات أو الإفادات ما راح ياخذ وقت بإذن الله.
اللي خلص اختباره وأموره تمام لا يشيل هم، وإن شاء الله تتحدث البيانات قريب.
بالتوفيق للجميع
🔴إذا واجهت مشكلة تقنية لا سمح الله في اختبارك:
🔴تواصل مع الدعم الفني مباشرة👇:
https://t.me/Plans_seu/678
🔴ارفع العذر وأرفق صورة المشكلة من👇:
الخدمات الإلكترونية ← أعذار التغيب عن الاختبارات الفصلية.
https://t.me/archivasSEU/1132
✅ إذا كنت مسوي الاختبار التجريبي :
بيتم النظر في عذرك، وإذا انقبل غالبًا بيكون اختبار الميد مع الفاينل.
❌ إذا ما سويت الاختبار التجريبي : حسب تعليمات الجامعة، ما راح يُقبل عذرك إذا كان بس…
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @Plans_seu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ارشيف التحضيري PMAU” (@Plans_seu), 12,552 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Plans_seu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
