Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -803. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,351–12,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 17:21
11,471
-10
9 Nov 2026, 06:57
11,481
-8
8 Nov 2026, 00:41
11,489
-3
6 Nov 2026, 22:55
11,492
-8
6 Nov 2026, 01:08
11,500
-12
4 Nov 2026, 22:04
11,512
-7
3 Nov 2026, 20:49
11,519
-14
2 Nov 2026, 19:49
11,533
-5
1 Nov 2026, 16:50
11,538
-6
31 Oct 2026, 17:59
11,544
-8
30 Oct 2026, 14:49
11,552
-7
29 Oct 2026, 16:56
11,559
-5
28 Oct 2026, 14:36
11,564
-9
27 Oct 2026, 11:55
11,573
-13
26 Oct 2026, 15:20
11,586
-3
25 Oct 2026, 14:56
11,589
-7
24 Oct 2026, 15:35
11,596
-9
23 Oct 2026, 15:50
11,605
-7
22 Oct 2026, 18:28
11,612
-9
21 Oct 2026, 11:38
11,621
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
401
Videos
38
Links
354
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
500 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
284
56.8%
🔥
135
27.0%
🙏
23
4.60%
👍
22
4.40%
👏
12
2.40%
💯
12
2.40%
🤩
7
1.40%
🥰
5
1.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 500 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Really thinking of doing it , to be honest
Every morning, I look at the charts by myself, it wouldn’t bother me to just send a Zoom link and have you guys trade alongside me… or at least hear me talk about what I predict in the market and economy
Hello Everyone This Is ( Luis ) ,
https://www.instagram.com/stories/dats_luis/3991492843931467536?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&stkn=c2c5eWp4a2Zyd2Fq
What Do You Think ?
MT5 available for everyone
200% deposit bonus
Credit/Debit cards accepted for deposits
Fast withdraws 🔥
1/2000 Leverage 👊🏽
https://secure.risenfx.com/links/go/2444
I’m happy to say that I promote a fully regulated broker ,
This means security for your funds in multiple safeguards and trustworthy, transparent trading protocols for you
https://www.instagram.com/stories/dats_luis/3742658248298799515?utm_source=ig_story_item_share&igsh=MW1jcGd2NnJwOXJzMQ==
You can trade Crypto’s In GatesFX, 💪🏽📈
The market fall tremendously perfect time to start stacking in some Buy’s
https://secure.gatesfx.com/links/go/10
The harder you work
The easier life becomes
Keep grinding everyone
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPjY2VEkmZ6/?igsh=MXNla2M3bzF1cDc0eA==
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Pips_nations. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Cue Tips w/ Charts @cuetipscharts · 33,374 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
Scalp Trading Lab @scalptradingLabb · 20,077 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 September 2026
Forex Chasers Public Group @forexchasersofficial · 28,444 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
NAS100 PRO SIGNALS💰💰 @Nas100freepip · 40,359 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Rio Traders - Gold Signals @RioTraders · 45,586 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
KOMMONFOREX COMMUNITY 📈📉🎯 @Kommonforextrades · 19,279 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
Trade With Chantel @TradeWithChantelTelegram · 32,712 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Little Panda Forex @LittlePandaForex · 37,307 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Swingtradinglab @alexsetandforget · 208,759 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
NASDAQ_NINJA FREE CHANNEL @smartradenr · 31,992 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Shinobi Signals @ShinobiSignals · 31,105 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PipsNation Signals” (@Pips_nations), 11,471 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pips_nations.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.