2024年豆瓣年度榜单跳转
❤1

Channel
@PinYunEmbyYes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,712subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001721422025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PinYunEmbyYes |
| Description | 食用指南:https://pinyunemby.notion.site 开号/查分/求片Bot @PYEmbyBot 推送频道: @PinYunEmbyYes 资源贡献/版权问题/机器人故障反馈: @PinYunEmbyPmBot 品云Emby初衷是小群体Emby,觉得积分麻烦的可以自行选择其他家,TG优秀的Emby有很多, 如:猫熊、pornemby、奥德赛、终点站、卷毛鼠等,大家可以选择适合自己的注册观看。 同时品云Emby不希望大家为了水而水,可以多讨论有意义的影视话题,共同创造一个良好的观影氛围。 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PinYunEmbyYes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 1,712 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 1,712 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 29 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
68 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 36.8% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 19.1% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 11.8% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2023 to 24 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2024年豆瓣年度榜单跳转
❤1
Netflix的《三体》好看吗? 以下是我看到觉得比较中肯的一个评论: 我觉得这事情很好理解,举个例子,看看新版小美人鱼就明白了。如果观众是个从来没看过小美人鱼的小孩子,那新版小美人鱼拍的还行,至少故事还挺有趣的,虽然影片质量并没有很优秀,“但至少能看且有些娱乐性”。但是小时候看过小美人鱼的人,只会有一个感觉那就是“毁童年”…… 为什么强行魔改毁掉一部作品和一份美好的回忆。 网飞三体也一样,为什么国内和国外口碑不同。因为国内观众很多看过原著,或者看过腾讯版,对这个故事有一定的心理预期和了解,再看到网飞的改编,就会觉得自己熟悉的那个”三体“被魔改了。 但对于欧美观众,网飞版三体不过是千百个类似的流量科幻片之一,而相比其他更俗套的流量片,这部三体至少点子很新颖,视觉体验也还有些奇幻和猎奇,值得无事可做的时候用来打发打发时间,要血浆有血浆,要感情线有感情线,要笑点有笑点,要科幻也有科幻,而且不需要对故事有了解,直白的就能看懂,…
👍18❤7🤮4
品味生活喜气扬, 云间烟火迎春光。 祝福声声随风传, 您在家中笑开颜。 新年新事新气象, 年年有余财源旺。 快乐常伴您身旁, 乐享人生福满堂。
👏13❤1👍1
史密斯怎么晒黑了?
👍3
#Movies #TV 🎬 Newlearnerの自留地「流媒体周报」#137 🔍 重点关注 ▎佳作扎堆上映,三月或为「电影狂欢月」 • 3 月 1 日:《沙丘》《奥本海默》《蜘蛛夫人:超感觉醒》 • 3 月 8 日:《沙丘 2》《孔秀》 • 3 月 22 日:《功夫熊猫 4》 • 3 月 29 日:《坠落的审判》《哥斯拉大战金刚 2:帝国崛起》 已经很难想象上次这样的「电影狂欢月」是哪一年。23 年年底艺联的几部电影现在想来,算是前菜,而今年三月的作品们才是饕餮大餐 我打算去二刷《沙丘》《奥本海默》,大家一定要去看 IMAX 版本;想去大荧幕为《坠落的审判》补个票,它也是我 23 年很喜欢的一部作品;视情况决定是否去看《功夫熊猫 4》,它也是我重要的童年回忆之一;今年春天最期待的一部电影必须是《沙丘 2》 上次和朋友里聊天,我说我很喜欢艺联。即使一些电影的排期很阴间,至少自己有机会走进影院去欣赏一些佳作,而不是被…
❤5👍2⚡1
2023 豆瓣电影榜单
❤1👍1
周海媚因病医治无效,于2023年12月11日去世。再见,“周芷若”!
💔8❤1
红粉哥斯拉+无限手套金刚 2024-04-12北美院线上映
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @PinYunEmbyYes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,039,645 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“品云Emby推送” (@PinYunEmbyYes), 1,712 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PinYunEmbyYes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.