Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,267. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,350–35,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 05:22
34,540
-135
18 Sept 2026, 22:02
34,675
-62
16 Sept 2026, 13:15
34,737
-55
14 Sept 2026, 16:17
34,792
-47
13 Sept 2026, 05:20
34,839
-66
11 Sept 2026, 06:41
34,905
-56
8 Sept 2026, 11:41
34,961
-118
5 Sept 2026, 08:57
35,079
-43
3 Sept 2026, 10:44
35,122
-40
2 Sept 2026, 03:04
35,162
-22
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
35,184
-39
30 Aug 2026, 21:36
35,223
-35
29 Aug 2026, 21:08
35,258
-19
29 Aug 2026, 00:27
35,277
-21
27 Aug 2026, 21:28
35,298
-12
27 Aug 2026, 00:43
35,310
-15
26 Aug 2026, 03:03
35,325
-31
25 Aug 2026, 03:38
35,356
-38
23 Aug 2026, 17:46
35,394
-33
22 Aug 2026, 03:48
35,427
first reading
Engagement
94 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.33%
avg views ÷ 34,540 subscribers
Avg views / post
459
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.183%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 94 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
94 (23 June 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
13,319
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
124
Links
53
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 30 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
37
72.5%
💔
14
27.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
وأبقى أسيرًا لصاحب الكلمة الطيبة، والابتسامة التي نكتمل بها ملامح الطمأنينة؛ لذلك الذي يفهمني دون أن أتحدث، ويقرأ ما أشعر به من نظرة عيني، فلا أحتاج أمامه إلى شرح التفاصيل، ولا إلى تبرير ما يسكن في داخلي، لأنه يفهمني كما أنا، دون سؤال، ودون مبررات.
إنهم أولئك الأشخاص الذين نشعر بقربهم براحة لا تُوصف، شخصيات نلتقي بها في العمر مرة أو مرتين، ثم تمضي بنا الأيام بعيدًا عنهم، فيختفون من المشهد، لكنهم لا يختفون من القلب.
ن…
أعرف ما معنى أن يحب المرء شخصًا بعيدًا كل البعد عنه، ما معنى أن يُحبّه كل يوم أكثر رغم الآميال والمسافات، رغم كل شيء، حتى ولو كان في الجهة الأخرى من العالم .
بعض الحكايات تنتهي فصولها في مرحلةٍ من العمر، لكنها تختار لها في القلب سكنًا لا ترحل عنه، وتبقى ما بقي من العمر، مهما تعاقبت السنوات وبلغ الإنسان من النضج عتيًا. تظل عالقةً في الذاكرة بكل تفاصيلها؛ لا يغيّرها الزمن، ولا تمحوها الأيام، لأنها كانت تحمل في بداياتها شيئًا من البراءة، وكثيرًا من الصدق، ومعنى الرقة وجمال الشعور في أول ولادته. كانت قصةً قصيرة، لم يُكتب لها أن تكتمل في صفحات الحياة، لكنها اكتملت في القلب شعو…
أحيانًا، لا بدّ أن تُوهم الجميع بأن سفينتك تغرق، لا لأنك ضعيف، ولا لأنك استسلمت، بل لتكتشف من سيبقى واقفًا بجانبك حين تشتدّ الأمواج، ومن سيبحث عن أول قاربٍ للنجاة ويتركك خلفه. ففي لحظات الغرق تتساقط الأقنعة، ويظهر الصادق من العابر، والوفيّ من المصلحة، ومن كان وجوده معك حبًا حقيقيًا لا خوفًا من فقدان ما تقدّمه له. دعهم يظنون أن النهاية اقتربت، ودع الأيام تكشف لك وحدها من يستحق أن تُكمل معه الطريق؛ فليست العبرة بمن راف…
يصبح المرء ثرثارًا حين يكون مع من يحب، لا لأن لديه الكثير ليقوله، بل لأنه يجد أمامه الشخص الوحيد الذي يريد أن يقول له كل شيء.
معك، لا أعرف كيف أصمت طويلًا؛ أخبرك عن يومي، عن فكرة عابرة مرّت في رأسي، عن شيء صغير أسعدني، وآخر أزعجني، ثعن تفاصيل لا تستحق أن تُحكى لأحد... لكنها تستحق أن تُحكى لك أنت.
أحادّثك وكأنني أسترد معك كل الكلام الذي ادّخرته طويلًا، وكأن قلبي، حين يجدك، لا يعود يعرف كيف يخفي شيئًا.
أطيل الحديث،…
لا أستطيع شرح حالتي أو بشكل أعمق
علتي التي أعاني منها، التغيرات المزاجية
السيئة لا أعرف سوى أني لا أفهمني .
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @PilBB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@PilBB edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مَ . @ltv8l · 29,373 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
وظائف و تعيينات العراق 24 @iraqjobs24 · 46,515 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
صمت @Samt_00 · 24,221 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خيال،اقتباسات،عبارات،رسائل،حب،فراق،حزن،ايجابية،حبيبي،حبيبتي،بنات،قروب،كروب” (@PilBB), 34,540 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PilBB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
