Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 98 days, net -2,505. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,926–36,183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 09:47
33,302
-44
10 Nov 2026, 11:06
33,346
-35
9 Nov 2026, 00:18
33,381
-43
7 Nov 2026, 14:07
33,424
-21
6 Nov 2026, 17:36
33,445
-27
5 Nov 2026, 18:20
33,472
-25
4 Nov 2026, 14:45
33,497
-35
3 Nov 2026, 14:00
33,532
-33
2 Nov 2026, 10:29
33,565
-28
1 Nov 2026, 12:06
33,593
-27
31 Oct 2026, 09:35
33,620
-24
30 Oct 2026, 08:51
33,644
-29
29 Oct 2026, 07:50
33,673
-24
28 Oct 2026, 08:56
33,697
-30
27 Oct 2026, 10:08
33,727
-25
26 Oct 2026, 11:28
33,752
-26
25 Oct 2026, 09:35
33,778
-16
24 Oct 2026, 13:06
33,794
-31
23 Oct 2026, 15:56
33,825
-28
22 Oct 2026, 16:29
33,853
first reading
Engagement
111 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.68%
avg views ÷ 33,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
558
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.405%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 111 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
111 (23 June 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
8,373
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 07:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
124
Links
54
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
69 reactions across 40 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
55
79.7%
💔
14
20.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (13.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
﴿ثُمَّ يُجزاهُ الجَزاءَ الأَوفى﴾ [النجم: 41]
هذا العالم لا يكافئ الأرواح الطيّبة دائمًا؛ قد تمنح بقلب كامل، ولا يعود إليك من عطائك شيء. قد تواسي، وتدعم، وتُحسن، ثم تمضي وحدك، كأنَّ ما بذلته لم يره أحد. لكن اللّٰه رأى، رأى الخير الذي فعلته في الخفاء، والرفق الذي اخترته حين كان القسوة أيسر والوجع الذي أخفيته كيلا تثقل به على أحد. وما ضاع عنده إحسانٌ، ولا خاب قلبٌ ظل طيبًا رغم ما لقي. فلا تندم على خيرٍ منحته، ولا تظن أن…
إن اختيارك للوحدة، وابتعادك عن كثير من الأشخاص، لا يعني أنك تعاني خللاً في نفسك، ولا أنه ضعف في شخصيتك أو عجز عن المواجهة، بل هو ضربٌ من ضروب الوعي والنضج؛ أن تختار راحة بالك على ضجيج لا طائل منه، وسكينة روحك على جدال لا يضيف إليك شيئاً. أن تدرك أن ليس كل من يطرق بابك يستحق أن تفتحه له، ولا كل من يعكّر صفوك يستحق أن تمنحه من وقتك وفكرك.
فبعض العزلة ليست هروباً من الحياة، وإنما عودة إلى الذات، وبعض الابتعاد ليس جفاءً،…
بعض الحكايات لا تبدأ إلا حين تنتهي، وبعض من نحب لا ندرك مقدار محبتنا لهم، ولا عمق مكانتهم في قلوبنا، إلا حين يرحلون. عند الفراق فقط، يتجلّى حجم حضورهم فينا، ونكتشف كم كان لهم من أثرٍ لا يُرى، وكم ترك رحيلهم من فراغٍ بين حنايا القلب. فراغٌ مهما حاول الزمن أن يملأه، ومهما جاءت الأيام بما فيها، يبقى فيه شيءٌ لا يُعوّض، لأن بعض الأماكن في القلب لا يسكنها إلا أصحابها. فحافظ على من تحب، وامنحهم ما استطعت من ودّك وقربك، فال…
أدعو لكَ كلَّ يوم، أن تعبرَ كلَّ المعاركِ الصعبة التي لا تحدّثني عنها، نلك التي تخوضِها بصمتٍ وتعود منها مُثقَلًا دون أن يراك أحد. أدعو اللٰه أن يراك حين تتعب، وأن يرفق بكَ حين لا يبقى فيك متّسعٌ للصبر، وأن يُمسك بقلبكَ في اللحظة التي تظنّ فيها أنّك وحدكَ في هذا العالم. أسأله ألّا يترك في روحكَ وجعًا إلّا أبدله سكينة، ولا خوفًا إِلّا آمنه، ولا تعبًا أخفيتَه عن الجميع إلا مسح عليه برحمته. وإن عجزتُ عن الوصول إليكَ حين…
أريد أن أكون شخصًا عاديًا،
حلم حياتي لم يعد أن أملك كل ما أريد، ولا أن أصل إلى مكانٍ طالما تمنيته. كل ما أريده أن أكون مستقرًا من الداخل، أن أستيقظ دون خوفٍ من شيء، وأن يمرّ يومي دون أن أنتظر خبرًا، أو أخشى فقدان أحد، أو أفتقد شيئًا لا أعرف كيف أستعيده أريد أن أكون شخصًا عاديًا لا يرهقه التفكير، ولا يوقظه القلق، ولا يسرق منه الماضي يومه، ولا يجعل المستقبل يعيش في انتظار دائم. أريد فقط أن أشعر بأنني بخير دون أن أحتاج …
في صدري مقبرة، دُفنت فيها أشياء كثيرة كنت أظنها سوف تنجو معي. أحلامٌ ماتت، وأجزاءٌ من قلبي وروحي، ونسخٌ قديمةٌ مني لم أعد أعرف كيف أستعيدها. أحيانًا أشعر أنني أمشي بين قبور ما فقدته واحدًا تلو الآخر، قبرٌ لشيءٍ كنت أحبه، وآخر لشيءِ كنت أؤمن به وثالث لنسخةٍ مني لم تعد موجودة. كلما تقدمت في العمر، لا أشعر أنني أضيف شيئًا إلى نفسي بقدر ما أفقد منها شيئًا وأدفنه في مكانٍ لا أعود إليه، ثم أمضي حتى أصبحت غريبًا عن الشخص ال…
"يدخلُ الجنّةَ أقوامٌ أفئدتُهم مثلُ أفئدةِ الطير"
تلك القلوب اللينة الطيبة التي، رغم ما رأته من قسوة الحياة، لا تزال تحمل من الرقة ما يجعلها تخاف أن تؤذي أحدًا، وتحزن لألم غيرها، وتلتمس الأعذار حتى حين تكون هي المتأذية. قلوبٌ لا تستسلم للحقد، ولا ترد الأذى بالأذى. إذا ضاقت بها الدنيا لجأت إلى الله، وإذا خافت اطمأنت بذكره، وإذا انكسرت لم تفقد رجاءها في رحمته. فطوبى لقلبٍ بقي رقيقًا في عالمٍ يحاول أن يقسيه، ولروحٍ لم ت…
إنَّ اللّٰه لا يُخيب ظنَّ الصابرين :
سوف يأتي يومُ نكون فيه كما حلمنا، ونعيش ما دعونا اللّٰه به طويلًا، وننظر إلى الأيام التي ظننا فيها أن كل شيءٍ قد فاتنا، فنحمده على أننا لم نفقد الأمل فيه. أعلم أن الانتظار مُتعب وأن بعض الأمنيات تسكن القلب طويلًا حتى نخشى ألا نراها تتحقق لكن اللّٰه يعلم كم تمنينا، وكم صبرنا، وكم مرةً رفعنا أيدينا إليه، ونحن لا نملك سوى الرجاء. فلا تدع طول الطريق يُنسيك أن اللّٰه قادرٌ على أن يغير …
اتراه في ندمٍ يلومُ فؤاده
ام ان بعدي عن يديه يهونُ
ما صان قلبي حين كنت جوارهُ
اتظنهُ عند الفراقِ يصونُ؟
Signed 𝗔𝗟𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗘𝗗𝗜 .
Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @PilBB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@PilBB edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 9 posts on @PilBB as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مَ . @ltv8l · 28,447 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
وظائف و تعيينات العراق 24 @iraqjobs24 · 45,801 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
صمت @Samt_00 · 23,458 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خيّال .” (@PilBB), 33,302 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PilBB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
