Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pierre Vogel widerlegt Talafis

Channel

Pierre Vogel widerlegt Talafis

@PierreVogel0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

63subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001745972167
TypeChannel
Username@PierreVogel0
Created29 March 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/PierreVogel0

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6163627 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers15 August 2026 — 62 subscribers23 August 2026 — 63 subscribers29 August 2026 — 62 subscribers13 September 2026 — 61 subscribers7 October 2026 — 63 subscribers7 August 20267 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 61 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Oct 2026, 05:0163+2
13 Sept 2026, 17:4261-1
29 Aug 2026, 14:1262-1
23 Aug 2026, 11:0663+1
15 Aug 2026, 02:2262-1
10 Aug 2026, 03:3063no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:2163first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 29 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 26s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1840.0%
👍1635.6%
👎920.0%
😁24.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2022 to 13 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Nov 2024, 09:49 UTC563 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Laut Hassan Dabbagh machen Fawzan, Ibn Uthaymeen, Ibn Baz und die Hanabilah spezifisch Takfir auf dem Unterlasser des Gebets.

❤2

21 Jun 2024, 08:26 UTC897 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Hassan Dabbagh bezeichnet es als KLAR, dass die meisten Herrscher heute GEGEN den Islam sind.

😁1

19 Jun 2024, 06:54 UTC948 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Der Islambekenner, der für den Geheimdienst, Verfassungsschutz o.ä. arbeitet, ist ein Kafir, selbst wenn er betet, fastet etc. Das er kein Takfir auf Erdogan macht, der sogar militärisch gegen Muslime zusammen Hand in Hand mit Kuffar vorgeht, ist inkonsequent und auch unlogisch, denn Erdogans Stellung ist gewaltiger als die eines NoName, der ein kleines Zahnrad im Kuffr System ist, im Kampf gegen des Islams.

❤1

18 Jun 2024, 12:51 UTC731 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

- Ahmadiyyah/Qadianiyyah sind Kuffar - Wer Qadianiyyah nicht zum Kafir erklärt, ist selbst ein Kafir Ich sage: Seltsamerweise entschuldigt Amen Dali jemanden, der am Wahrheitsgehalt des Qur'ans zweifelt, was um ein Vielfaches schlimmer ist!

❤2

12 Jan 2023, 00:23 UTC≈2,190 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Es ist eine Bedingung, um in den Islam einzutreten, dass du weißt, das der Islam nicht Religion und Staat trennt, wie die Christen es beispielsweise getan haben. https://t.me/PierreVogel0

👍7👎3❤2

9 Jan 2023, 00:28 UTC≈2,120 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

In welchen 3 Fällen, ist eine Person laut allen Gelehrten ein Kafir? https://t.me/PierreVogel0

👎6👍2

11 Jul 2022, 21:32 UTC≈2,460 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Was ist die gefährlichste Sekte mit der gefährlichsten Bid'ah in unserer heutigen Zeit und wrm? Er spornt an mehr über dieses Thema zu sprechen und widerlegt gewisse Aussagen wie: - Es bringt nichts Takfir zu machen, kümmer dich um dich selbst Laut seinem Shaykh ist der Säkularismus der Taghut dieses Zeitalters https://t.me/PierreVogel0

❤7

29 May 2022, 02:01 UTC≈1,810 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Neil bin Radhan widerlegt Murji'ah/Jahmiyyah und bezieht sich auf Shaykh Uthaymeen rh https://t.me/PierreVogel0

👍1

14 May 2022, 14:49 UTC≈1,760 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Urteil dass in muslimischen Ländern Alkoholkonsum per Gesetz erlaubt wird - Sh ibn Uthaymeen rh https://t.me/PierreVogel0

13 May 2022, 18:50 UTC≈1,660 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Bei welchen Fällen besteht ein Konsens des Kuffrs und welche Verse werden dafür benutzt? https://t.me/PierreVogel0

❤2

4 May 2022, 17:20 UTC≈1,530 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Arbeitet Erdogan Richtung Kalifat? Was ist das Urteil von Aussagen - Man muss den Laizismus verteidigen https://t.me/PierreVogel0

👍2

3 May 2022, 15:05 UTC≈1,420 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

- Ab wann ist der Führer ein Kafir ohne jegliche Meinungsverschiedenheit? - Ist Selbstjustiz erlaubt? https://t.me/PierreVogel0

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @PierreVogel0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pierre Vogel widerlegt Talafis” (@PierreVogel0), 63 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PierreVogel0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.