Channel
@Phystech2050
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003039384280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Phystech2050 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 24 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Phystech2050 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 117 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 116 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 116 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
79 reactions across 6 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 34 | 43.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 21.5% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 8.86% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 3.80% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 2.53% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 1.27% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 30 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎄 С Новым годом, Физтех 2050 🎄 Этот год был про важное. Про честные разговоры о будущем МФТИ. Про попытку смотреть не на учебный год — а на 25 лет вперед. Про людей, которые не ждут идеальных условий, а начинают действовать. Физтех 2050 в этом году — это сообщество выпускников, студентов, преподавателей и партнёров, которые договорились о главном: будущее нашего университета в зоне нашей личной ответственности. М…
🔥5❤2🎄2🎉1
Проектирование будущего технологического предпринимательства в МФТИ. В рамках форума Физтех.Индустрия при поддержке рабочей группы инициативы «Физтех 2050» была проведена экспертная сессия по проектированию будущего технологического предпринимательства МФТИ. В мероприятии приняли участие более 25 экспертов - руководителей образовательных направлений, компаний-партнеров, предпринимателей и лидеров венчурной индустрии…
🔥6❤4🙏3🍌1
🎬 Специальный показ фильма про МФТИ Идеальная программа для воскресного вечера ☝️ Этот фильм — первый студенческий полнометражный фильм о Московском физико-техническом институте. Он рассказывает о том, что делает Физтех уникальным — о людях, идеях и философии, которая объединяет поколения студентов, преподавателей и выпускников. После просмотра состоится дискуссия с авторами этого творения — Антоном Орешкиным и Р…
🔥5⚡3❤3🤡1
🙌 Развитие человеческого капитала МФТИ — один из важнейших фокусов инициативы «Физтех 2050» Готовы сделать шаг к новому уровню? Примите участие в конкурсном отборе на программу обучения MBA «Вызовы будущего» от Глобального университета Рыбакова и МФТИ — при поддержке Рыбаков Фонда! 🎓Для сотрудников МФТИ с управленческим стажем от 5 лет. Грант покрывает 100 % стоимости программы (2 950 000 рублей). Старт обучения…
🔥4👍3❤2
7️⃣ Больших идей и общая архитектура инициативы «Физтех 2050» С июня по октябрь 2025 года более 100 представителей самых разных сообществ МФТИ встречались для обсуждения совместного привлекательного образа будущего. Всего было 12 встреч, часть из них очно, часть онлайн, а среди участников были студенты, преподаватели, выпускники, представители ректората, партнеры и друзья Физтеха. На картинках выше можно увидеть о…
🔥6👍4🤝4🥴1
🤝 Установочная встреча инициативы «Физтех 2050» | Часть 2 22 октября на встрече рабочей группы с попечительским советом и советом инициативы мы представили ключевые идеи и направления развития. Екатерина Елисеева — ретроспектива событий с момента первого упоминания инициативы 31 мая 2024 года и даже того, что стало причиной всего случившегося. Часть информации кстати есть в этом канале ☝️ Дмитрий Боровиков — 7 бо…
🔥8❤6🤝4😭1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Phystech2050. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 445,873 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инициатива Физтех 2050 🌏” (@Phystech2050), 117 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Phystech2050.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.