متعة الفيزياء-PHYSICS FUN
قناة متخصصة لفيزياء ٣ ث🪐
هنا لمساعدتكم في حل مشاكل الفيزياء✅
فيديوهات وأسئلة واختبارات🗒
https://www.youtube.com/@-PHYSICSFUN
أكونت الدعم العلمي:
@physicsfun_Team
أكونت التيم والدعم:
@Physicse_FunTeam
#لا_تنسى_قضيتك
Created
Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,925–9,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 18:38
9,925
-3
17 Aug 2026, 15:15
9,928
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 9,925 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
25 (9 August 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
25,201
Reactions total
252
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,050
Videos
≈543
Links
≈882
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
252 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
202
80.2%
🍓
12
4.76%
😁
12
4.76%
🥰
11
4.37%
🫡
7
2.78%
❤🔥
2
0.794%
👏
2
0.794%
💘
2
0.794%
⚡
1
0.397%
🏆
1
0.397%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
زرعوا في عقول كُل من هو خارج فلسطين وكل من هو خارج غزة على وجه التحديد أن الفلسطيني والغزي أسطورة لا يمكن كسرها ولا تضعف..ونحن زرعنا هذا بأيدينا بشعرنا وأناشيدنا (هو أنت قد الأحرار...ازرع جذورك فأنت باقٍ..والله لا نُهزم) والكثير الكثير من الأناشيد التي تملأ الريلزات ومحتويات المشاهير على مواقع التوصل.
صوَّروا أن الفلسطيني صخرةٌ لا يمكن كسرها، وأنه ساقٌ سينبت لو تم قطعه مليار مرة..سينبت من بين الركام والدمار والنار.…
الشباب اللي قلقانة من موضوع الكتب الخارجية ومفيش مقالي وبتاع
حل سؤال الاختر بتاعك مع التعليل والتفسير
بمعنى كل سؤال اختر تحله تكتب خطواته بإيدك زي الشاطر متكسلش وتحله بعينك 🤏
ومتقلقش من المقالي المفروض تقلق منه هو فهمك للمادة مش أكتر
هيسألك في فيزياء في الأول والآخر
يبق يجيب الامتحان بالشكل اللي يعجبه والفاهم منهجه كويس مش هيهمه شيء🫶
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
مستر عبد الله حشاد، بعد إذن حضرتك اسمحلي أنزل الفيديو ده عندك وأطلب من الشباب الانضمام إلى القناة ، والى قناة الترجمان بتاعتنا في اللغة العربية.
https://youtu.be/6sTpUcEzozM?si=WBYNXncsqAY4Nowu
متخافوش ياشباب أو بمعني اصح متفكروش كتير في الموضوع دا لأن انت خفت وقلقت وفكرت....بعدها:) ولا اي شي
القرار مش فـ ايدك يبقي ركز علي التقدر تعمله الا وهو المذاكره والفهم الكويس وخلاص
انا عن نفسي كنت منقطع عن الأخبار دي كل البعمله بسال مدرس الرياضيات عندي (ربنا يكرمه ويجازيه خير ) عن الأخبار وهو يقولي وبيقولي بس ما عليك لانهم قاصدين يعملوا شوشره وهيصه احنا شعب بنحب الجو دا
كدا كدا نصيبك مكتبلك يمكن كلنا عارفين دا بس م…
نكتفي بدا تسخين...
لأجل أن في ناس بدأت
وعبارة عجبتني فـ حبيت اشاركها معاكم..
قد لا املك انتصارات باهرة، لكنني قادر على أن أدهشك بالهزائم التي استطعت ان أنجو منها!
❤19🥰4💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Physicse_Fun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الكيمياء مع مستر محمد عبد الجواد لطلاب 3 ثانوى 🧪 @MAGFULLMARKG3 · 123,377 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 17 August 2026
عبقري لغة - Ahmed Tarek @ahmedtarekMrgenius · 90,146 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 August 2026
محمد الجيلاني @u222c · 87,783 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“متعة الفيزياء-PHYSICS FUN” (@Physicse_Fun), 9,925 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Physicse_Fun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
