Channel
@PhoeniciaHistory
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002138890464 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PhoeniciaHistory |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PhoeniciaHistory |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 99 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 98 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 97 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:36 | 97 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 1 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
92 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 68 | 73.9% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 18.5% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.35% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 3.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @PhoeniciaHistory. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2025 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The Second Carthaginian in History Have you ever wondered who was the second Carthaginian in history after Dido? Meet Malchus. He is the first historical Carthaginian we can actually name after the legendary founder. His story comes down to us through the much later Roman historian Justin, and it’s a strange, messy, almost cinematic tale of victory, exile, civil war, and family betrayal. Malchus (his name is simp…
❤3
Why do I like history? Understanding the past will always help us understand the present and the future. This picture below does not represent the views of myself or the official position of this channel, it’s just funny 😆
❤4😁3
Young Hannibal takes an oath of eternal enmity to Rome ⚔️ Artist: Sandra Delgado
❤4
Such tophets are separated from normal cemeteries, which may suggest a cultural procedure different from than of an adult burial. Interestingly, multiple animal bones were often mixed in with infant bones in these urns. While there are many who argue that the presence of Tophets unequivocally support the idea of child sacrifice through burning, another group of scientists suggest an alternative explanation: seeing T…
❤5
On the subject of child sacrifice in Phoenicia and Carthage. Part 3 and Conclusion Dear All! After a very long delay (apologies!), I am publishing the last, 3rd post on this topic, where I am hoping to review and discuss together with you the archaelogical evidence of the child sacrifice and try to summarize what we know about the topic. In the 1st post we started the discussion mainly on general facts that are kn…
❤4
''Offering to Molech'' by Charles Foster, 1897. One of the many ways in which the child sacrifice is depicted. Hi all! I was glad to see a lot of discussion including many great insights on my opening post on this topic. Hopefully, we can the keep same spirit in this and the following posts on the topic! To keep digging into this subject, let's review the historical accounts that mention the practice of child sacr…
👍7
On the subject of child sacrifice in Phoenicia and Carthage. Part 1 Dear All! There is perhaps not a single topic from Phoenicial history that has been discussed more than the practice of moloch, or the child sacrifice to gods. From the Bible to countless scientific papers, from numerous ancient accounts of the Romans and Greeks to fiction literature of all periods, thousands of sheets of paper were dedicated to co…
👍7
Sorry for radio silence for such a long time, a new post about the unsettling practice of molk, or child sacrifice, is coming out in a few days! 📢 also a Public Announcement: Sydney Sweeney is no longer welcome in our Telegram group🚨
🔥3❤1👍1
⚔️ The Mercenary War, or Truceless War, was a brutal conflict fought between Carthage and its mutinous soldiers from 241 to 237 BCE, during a lull in the Punic Wars. When Carthage's mercenary soldiers were denied the payment that they had been promised, they revolted, leading to a large-scale rebellion supported by several North African settlements. The Carthaginians initially fared poorly against the rebels, but th…
❤3
Another depiction of this event by Giambattista Tiepolo.
❤6
Drawing depicts a famous episode of the early stage of the Second Punic War. Standing before the Carthaginian Senate, Roman emissary Quintus Fabius Maximus demanded surrendering Hannibal as a prisoner, holding up two ends of his toga, saying that one stood for peace, the other for war. He let the Carthaginian senate choose but they insisted that Fabius would decide. After the delegation had received the Carthaginian…
❤2
Look at this amazing find from a used books store 😍 Expect a lot of pics and new insights!
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @PhoeniciaHistory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“r/PhoeniciaHistoryFacts” (@PhoeniciaHistory), 99 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PhoeniciaHistory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.