Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Phil Brophy Tips

Channel

Phil Brophy Tips

@PhilBrophy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

4,400subscribers

+729 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375116115
TypeChannel
Username@PhilBrophy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/PhilBrophy

Growth

3,5884,4003,9947 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,671 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,667 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,654 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,626 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,605 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,588 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,864 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,400 subscribers7 August 202626 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net +729. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,466–4,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Aug 2026, 22:144,400+536
23 Aug 2026, 20:083,864+276
20 Aug 2026, 05:083,588-17
17 Aug 2026, 12:543,605-21
14 Aug 2026, 14:573,626-28
10 Aug 2026, 20:163,654-13
8 Aug 2026, 06:333,667-4
7 Aug 2026, 20:013,671no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:233,671first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 4,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.755%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,072
Reactions total76
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

243 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11848.6%
🔥4719.3%
👍4418.1%
🤩124.94%
👏93.70%
🎉62.47%
👌31.23%
🙏20.823%
❤‍🔥10.412%
🏆10.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC499 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

INFO IN 📞 🇬🇧 8.38 Haydock 🐎 Invicible Ruby - 9/1 Owners think 9/1 is huge value here and they make her a strong each way bet 💪🏼

9

6 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC837 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇪 7.30 Sligo 🐎 Lilac Lady - 6/4 Top 3 Finish ☑️ Lilac Lady won here on her last start and has finished in the places on her last 5 starts at Sligo. She is in great form at home and is expected to run very well again today.

1

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC826 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇪 5.45 Sligo 🐎 Manoir De Mirande - 6/4 Winner of his last two starts at Sligo and Ballinrobe connections of Manoir De Mirande are very confident he will win again today 💪🏼

2

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,040 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,010 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Wednesday Footy Banker 🏦 🇪🇺 UCL Qualifying ⚽️ Fenerbahce v Sturm Graz

7👏1

4 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈1,220 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥31

4 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,210 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Tuesday Footy Banker 🏦 🇪🇺 UCL Qualifying ⚽️ H. Beer Sheva v Crvena Zvezda

👍9🔥2👏1

4 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,200 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥75👍4👏1

4 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,130 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Tuesday Footy Banker 🏦 ⚽️ Royale Union v Bodo/Glimt

👍7🔥4🏆1

28 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC≈2,040 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏51

28 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC≈1,790 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Tuesday Footy Banker 🏦 🇧🇷 Brazil Serie B ⚽️ Juventude v Avai

4👍2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @PhilBrophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Phil Brophy Tips” (@PhilBrophy), 4,400 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PhilBrophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.