Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سيوران - شوبنهاور

Channel

سيوران - شوبنهاور

@Phiilosophy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,306subscribers

+116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002185352942
TypeChannel
Username@Phiilosophy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Phiilosophy

Growth

3,1903,3063,2487 August 2026 — 3,190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,201 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,249 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,306 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +116. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,173–3,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:353,306+57
14 Aug 2026, 03:573,249+48
10 Aug 2026, 15:123,201+10
7 Aug 2026, 19:343,191+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:463,190first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 3,306 subscribers
Avg views / post
371
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 December 20252 August 2026)
Views total741
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

289 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20872.0%
👏258.65%
💯134.50%
😁113.81%
🔥93.11%
💘62.08%
🖕41.38%
👌31.04%
👍31.04%
👀20.692%
🙏20.692%
👎10.346%
😢10.346%
🥰10.346%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC234 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"بقدر ما يمتلك الإنسان أشياء كثيرة بداخله، بقدر ما يشتد إستغناؤه عن الناس والعالم الخارجي." ‏آرثر شوبنهاور

8

27 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC507 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"لا تبدُو الحياةُ مَعقولةً إلا لِمن لا عقلَ لهُ" - سيوران

6

13 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC917 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"إنّ راحة البال والصحة الجيدة مستحيلتان بدون فترات طويلة من العزلة والخلوة ؛ فالاستغناء عن البشر وتفادي الإختلاط الكثير بهم لأجل تحقيق الطمأنينة والسكينة هو عين العقل." - شوبنهاور

10👍1

29 Jun 2026, 15:27 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

- تعيش عمرك وأنت تكتشف كل يوم شيئًا جديدًا في نفسك ثم يأتي من يقول لك: أنا أعرفك جيدًا. - إميل سيوران .

9👏5🔥4

12 Jun 2026, 20:35 UTC≈2,350 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"قد يقول المرء لنفسه، تلقائياً، عندما يقع بصره على ما لا يملكه: يا ليتني، أملك: هذا! والحال أن هذه الطريقة في التعبير بالذات هي المسؤولة عن تحويل حرمانه إلى شيء فعلي ومحسوس. إذ كان يجب عليه أن يخاطب نفسه، دراءً لهذا الإحساس، كالآتي: وماذا لو لم أكن أملك هذا؟! معنى ذلك أنه يتوجب على الإنسان أن يتمرّن على تخيّل افتقاده لخيرات ونِعَم هي بحوزته الآن، وتشمل الثروة والأصدقاء والخليلة والزوجة والأطفال والحصان والكلب. فشر

20🔥4👍2

27 May 2026, 21:46 UTC≈1,850 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

إن كنت تبحث عن قنوات فلسفية تقدّم اقتباسات وأفكارًا دون إعلانات مزعجة أو تحب الاطلاع على الكتب والفلسفة والنقاشات الثقافية فهذا المجلد صُمّم لك انضم الآن عبر الرابط أدناه 👇 https://t.me/addlist/ive6rc9k4JUxZmZi

1

22 May 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,860 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"الوعي لعنة مُزمنة، كارثة مَهولة، إنهُ منفانا الحقيقي...فالجهل وطن، أما الوعي فهو منفى" ـ سيوران

14

10 May 2026, 20:28 UTC≈1,720 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

يقول الفيلسوف و الكاتب الروماني إميل سيوران لأننا فشلنا في خلق إنسان يفكر لم يتكون لدينا شعب بل تشكل لدينا جمهور جمهور يصفق و جمهور لاعن يصفق مرة و يلعن مرة لكنه أبداً لا يفكر وهذا ما نعيشه اليوم كيف جعلونا لا نفكر إلا بكيفية الهروب من هذا البلد .

11👏4

20 Apr 2026, 11:48 UTC≈2,110 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"كلما زاد ذكاء الإنسان، زادت معاناته. الجهل يمنح الإنسان راحة زائفة، أما الفكر العميق فهو لعنة تحمل في طياتها الألم. لهذا السبب، نرى أن أغلب الناس يعيشون حياتهم في سعادة سطحية، بينما أولئك الذين يمتلكون عقولًا عظيمة يعانون بصمت. المعرفة تكشف لنا زيف العالم، وتجعلنا ندرك أن كثيرًا مما يؤمن به الناس ليس سوى أوهام. ومع ذلك، فليس أمام الإنسان سوى السعي إلى الفهم، لأن الجهل قد يكون مريحًا، لكنه لا يليق بالعقل النبيل الذي

20💯13👀2👏1🥰1😢1

25 Mar 2026, 11:53 UTC≈2,150 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ليس في الحياة مأساة أكبر من أن تستيقظ كل يوم... دون سبب حقيقي للاستيقاظ. - إميل سيوران

20👎1

4 Mar 2026, 21:52 UTC≈2,570 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"أرثر #شوبنهاور" - من منظور الحقيقة المطلقة وطبيعة الأشياء في كنهها، لا مناص للمرء من أن يعتبر كل ما في هذا العالم من آلام ومعاناة كأنها آلامه هو ومعاناته الشخصية، ذلك أن الإدراك الذي ينفذ ببصيرته إلى ما وراء مبدأ "التفرد" الوهمي، ليرى أن تلك الحياة السعيدة التي قد يحياها المرء في غضون هذا الزمن، سواء كانت هبة من مصادفة عمياء أو ثمرة لحصافة وحسن تدبير، وهو محاط في الوقت ذاته بمعاناة لا حصر لها لبشر لا يحصون، كل ه

13💘6

19 Feb 2026, 08:06 UTC≈2,430 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"السعادة نادرة إلى هذا الحد لأننا لا نصل إليها إلا بعد الشيخوخة في ذروة الهرم – إنها نعمة حكٌر على قلة قليلة من الفانين ." • المياه كلها بلون الغرق - إميل سيوران

10👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Phiilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,081,366 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سيوران - شوبنهاور” (@Phiilosophy), 3,306 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Phiilosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.